Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Non-Commissioned Pilots

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Non-Commissioned Pilots

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Aug 2007, 09:27
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Wattashame
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ralph, regarding your statement regarding what I assume is DE Officers doing more than one flying tour because of Apache, I beg to differ.
In my experience while serving with the first Attack Sqn only one of the Capt's who was a flight commander has been posted into a second flying tour. One went to become an Adj, one went on to become the Regt'l Ops Offr (now a LUH Regt) and the one Capt (now Maj) who got a second flying tour, will be moved from his flying tour at AMTAT on promotion (heaven forbid that an officer with operational experience be allowed to pass that on to new officers graduating through CTR).
I guess that one of the reasons the manning levels on Attack Sqns are as low as they are because DE Officers must adhere to Army career profiles, not Army Air Corps desirable profiles and therefore must move on when their year of birth dictates they must in order that they be given the opportunity to reach the rank of General.
AHQHI656SQN is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2007, 10:12
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Several miles SSW of Watford Gap
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its surprising how many SNCOs say that they could easily do an officer's job yet when offered a commission they turn it down.
How many SNCOs in the RAF are 'offered a commission'? Excluding those who are commissioned through the Commissioned Warrant Officer scheme all others are only 'offered' the Queen's commission once they have succesfully passed OASC then IOT; I am not sure that there are that many who would go through that lot just to turn the offer down!

Or did you mean offered the opportunity to compete for a commission?
Climebear is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2007, 10:53
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Over the rainbow
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts


Shack37

1966, 206 Sqn, 2 x Sgt pilots, Nuclear Depth Charges.
History rewritten?
s37


Are you sure the dates are correct ?
I thought NCO pilots ceased being recruited in the mid 1950's. I do remember Master Pilots flying the Pembroke and similar in the 1960's. And I think I am right in saying that a welsh Master Pilot was still flying helicoptors from the OCU at Odiham in the 1970's.








We knew how to whinge but we kept it in the NAAFI bar.'
philrigger is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2007, 11:23
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: morayshire
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Sgt pilots

Philrigger
When I went through the Shack MOTU in 1964/5 one Sgt Pilot was sent away for a few days to get sorted out with a new uniform and came back as an officer. G.... Y... where are you now?
Further when I arrived at BallyKelly and joined 210 the co-pilot on my first crew was a Sgt. He was pressurised into going for a comission but turned it down and left to fly for BEA/BOAC. We didn't get the boomers until the PhaseIII version of the Shacks came into service in (consults log-book)about the back end of 1966, and I'm pretty sure there were no NCO pilots or navs at BKY by that time.
The Ancient Mariner
Oh and PS most of my flying training was spent with FS and Master pilots and navs (as well as Fred Reeves)
Rossian is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2007, 15:22
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: N. Spain
Age: 80
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Philrigger,
I was on 206 fron 1962 to 1966 and we had 2 sgt pilots.
There was a gap mid/63 to mid/64 when I was away on a course so it's possible it was 62/63 but certainly not as early as the mid 50's.
From then on through 37Sqn, (66,67) and BK (68/71) there were no NCO pilots on Shacks that I'm aware of which fits with Rossian's version.

The phase three's were operational at St. Mawgan when I left there in June 66.

s37
Shack37 is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2007, 18:31
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere flat
Age: 68
Posts: 5,580
Likes: 0
Received 52 Likes on 34 Posts
Climebear:

I refer to the oportunity to apply for a commision. Forgive me - I did not consider the pedants when adding my previous post!
Wensleydale is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2007, 20:08
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Detroit MI
Age: 66
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wensleydale:

Your "theory" discounts those who, when it is suggested they should apply for a commission, chose not to simply because they like the people they currently associate with and don't wish to be a part of the "boyish high spirits" that take place in the Officers Mess.

Don't tell me, I already know... All your pals where totally spiffing chaps, mature, fun to be with, not arrogant or overbearing in the least and generally all round "bon oeufs". It's such a shame that 99% of the OR's never got to serve with your pals...
Airborne Aircrew is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2007, 21:30
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Detroit MI
Age: 66
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Deliverance:

Funnily enough, of the four people in my AAITC course that I know their resulting situations, two are now officers, one is a Master ALM and one is a successful civilian earning six figures in the computer industry. To my knowledge, each one of them is very happy with their position.

The fact that each is happy where they are is indicative that not everyone aspires to the same things you do. The fact that some officers think that others should aspire to be like them is indicative of the arrogance I alluded to earlier.

Whether you like it or not choosing not to be an officer is not indicative of an inability to do the job, nor is it indicative of not wanting the responsibility. It is, plain and simply, a wish to do what we want to do not what others may feel "is best for us". Had I done that in my career I can assure you I would not be in the position I am now in and I most certainly would not have been as happy.

As you accurately noted there are good Officers, bad Officers, good SNCO Aircrew and bad SNCO Aircrew. I'm past caring what most officers think of me yet there are many I respect and some that are friends. What gets lost by many officers, and especially pilot types, is that the OR's, in more cases than you care to think of or care about, are equally hard working, loyal, reliable, trustworthy and yes, talented and intelligent as a large proportion of the officer cadre.

So, I'm prepared to sit here and "poison" flight crews while I see blatant arrogance and misplaced superiority being spouted by those that suffer from such "ailments".

Cry all you like about what I say... I'm just the mirror of many of the men you deal with daily... except I'm sufficiently anonymous and removed in this medium to be able to say it to your face, so to speak.

Edited in order to avoid spelling Nazis.

Last edited by Airborne Aircrew; 15th Aug 2007 at 21:55.
Airborne Aircrew is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2007, 00:56
  #69 (permalink)  
Cunning Artificer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The spiritual home of DeHavilland
Age: 76
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As for UAVs, CAA regs require a qualified pilot to be in command when they fly outside of danger areas, so I don't see much of cost saving there
What the CAA require is that when sharing airspace with civilian traffic there should be a human operator - trained and qualified on type - in control of the UAV. They don't want autonomous UAVs controlled by artificial intelligence, mixing with civilian traffic. Some UAVs would require better qualified operators than others, but most long endurance surveillance models have very simple controls and could be operated by the average spotty faced teenager, trained on M/S Flight Sim.
Blacksheep is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.