Temporary airway
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 2 m South of Radstock VRP
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
rudekid; correct me if I'm wrong but you seem to be questioning chevvron's credentials. He gained his CAA ATCO Licence (a quaint civvy concept for qualification) at the same time as me in 1972. Unlike me, he stuck at it and made it his career. When did you pass for yours?
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Anywhere
Posts: 2,212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GBZ
Forgive me if I'm being thick here but where is the "already established CAS" that leads to Scampton that could contain a decompression descent and maintain separation from traffic in Class G?
Originally Posted by niknak
How many of you were incovenienced by this obviously irritable piece of CAS?......................
The consequences to the parachute people at Hibaldstow
The consequences to the parachute people at Hibaldstow
Originally Posted by chevvron
'cos SVFR clearances are allowed in CAS-T.
Last edited by Chilli Monster; 6th Aug 2007 at 00:04.
Join Date: May 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
GBZ
Congratulations to you both on your qualifications. I'm sure his credentials are immaculate...
Sadly, the information he is stating as fact is patently incorrect.
I'm not commenting on the validity of special use airspace, CAS-T, RLLC or others. I'm personally ambivalent about it's implementation, I can see clearly how it would cause considerable irritation over the top of an active parachute centre. However, this is not why I replied to the thread...
Is an incorrect statement. Tombstone is equally wrong in his support, although possibly correct in his assertions about Lincolnshire
ATCO17, who incidentally may have a similar qualifications to your own much vaunted ones, has quoted correctly as to the processes employed in
securing this airspace. Maybe the processes your colleagues describe were correct in 1972, but I can absolutely assure you that this not the case now. In this instance, my credentials are immaculate!
Thanking for jumping to the assistance of your colleague. Most of my posts on this thread are posted in banter...But that's a quaint military concept of humour, when do you pass for yours?
Congratulations to you both on your qualifications. I'm sure his credentials are immaculate...
Sadly, the information he is stating as fact is patently incorrect.
I'm not commenting on the validity of special use airspace, CAS-T, RLLC or others. I'm personally ambivalent about it's implementation, I can see clearly how it would cause considerable irritation over the top of an active parachute centre. However, this is not why I replied to the thread...
Chilli - it's 32 Sqdn at Northolt who actually request this airspace; if you want to whinge, try them for starters.
ATCO17, who incidentally may have a similar qualifications to your own much vaunted ones, has quoted correctly as to the processes employed in
securing this airspace. Maybe the processes your colleagues describe were correct in 1972, but I can absolutely assure you that this not the case now. In this instance, my credentials are immaculate!
Thanking for jumping to the assistance of your colleague. Most of my posts on this thread are posted in banter...But that's a quaint military concept of humour, when do you pass for yours?
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 2 m South of Radstock VRP
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Chilli Monster, thanks for answering the first part. What about the contingency for decompression, though? Also, do you Mil chaps plan for RCF?
rudekid, congratulations on your skill at disguising the banter,
.
rudekid, congratulations on your skill at disguising the banter,
.
Last edited by GOLF_BRAVO_ZULU; 6th Aug 2007 at 11:11. Reason: Distraction by the day job
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Anywhere
Posts: 2,212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What about the contingency for decompression
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: At the Dog and Duck
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Requesting establishment of CAS(T)
Rudekid and ATCO17 are correct....The request for the establishment of CAS(T) is the responsibility of the AIRCRAFT OPERATOR, which is not always 32 SQn.
