Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

USA Plans Major Saudi Arms Deal

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

USA Plans Major Saudi Arms Deal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Jul 2007, 15:27
  #1 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,452
Received 1,616 Likes on 739 Posts
USA Plans Major Saudi Arms Deal

BBC: US 'plans huge Saudi arms deal'

The United States is reported to be preparing a major arms deal with Saudi Arabia worth $20bn (£9.8bn) over the next decade.
It is said to be part of a strategy for countering Iran's growing strength.

Defence officials quoted by US media and the AFP news agency said it would include missile guidance systems, upgraded fighter jets and naval ships. To counter objections from Israel, they said, the Jewish state would be offered significantly increased military aid.

But the New York Times says Bush administration officials are concerned that the size of the package and broader concerns about Saudi Arabia's influence in Iraq could prompt critics in Congress to oppose the package.

Defence Secretary Robert Gates is said to be planning to discuss the proposals in a visit to Saudi Arabia next week with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.

The officials said discussions with Congress on the arms package had just begun, and that no announcements were expected during the visit. Other US allies in the region - Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates - could receive equipment and weaponry as part of the deal, the officials said.

------------------

Between this, the French and the UK with Typhoon the Saudis really are in a major arms race vs the Iranians. One hopes it doesn't all come unstuck down the line. or even more so should I say, with their proxy war in Iraq.
ORAC is online now  
Old 28th Jul 2007, 19:23
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 64
Posts: 2,278
Received 37 Likes on 15 Posts
Is this the reason the septics want to investigate BAES and the Al Yamamah dealings.


Mr Brown should insist on an investigation into the septics dealings.... But I bet he won't.
ZH875 is online now  
Old 28th Jul 2007, 19:31
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Long ago and far away ......
Posts: 1,399
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
So who are these quoted 'Defence officials' going to pay their bung to?
MrBernoulli is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2007, 19:47
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the 1980's when the Sea Harrier deal to India was going, I was in close contact with the French Matra team - they were supplying the Magic 550 missile, as the U.S. wouldn't allow the Sidewinder.

When my French chum turned up looking rather sunburnt, I asked where he'd been - " Oh, Libya "...
Double Zero is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2007, 21:34
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: by the Great Salt Lake, USA
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And just why did the French refuse permission for the USAF to fly F-111s over France to attack the Libyans in 1986?

To protect their arms deals?
GreenKnight121 is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2007, 09:12
  #6 (permalink)  
Green Flash
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hmm, now, just remind me. In the past, did the West ever help build up a Middle East country to counter the percieved threat from Iraq?
 
Old 29th Jul 2007, 09:29
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As ye sow, so shall ye reap.



TOG
Toxteth O'Grady is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2007, 11:38
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Closer than you think...
Age: 65
Posts: 390
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Answers why there's all the investigation going on into BAES out in the States then...

... Trust we will return the favour then and look into the US dealings...

A very long and detailed look into those insisting on the investigation into BAE and their associates would be a good hit for starters...
Always a Sapper is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2007, 14:44
  #9 (permalink)  
Green Flash
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
TOG

Got it in one. Sadly.
 
Old 29th Jul 2007, 15:21
  #10 (permalink)  
brickhistory
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
A couple of thoughts on this:

Is this the reason the septics want to investigate BAES and the Al Yamamah dealings.
Answers why there's all the investigation going on into BAES out in the States then...
So the UK government does an investigation on BAeS and you don't comment? And then that investigation is stopped by the PM and you don't comment? Hmmm, pot to kettle......

And then there's this:

Answers why there's all the investigation going on into BAES out in the States then...
If it's a US-based subsidiary and subject to US laws and there is reason to suspect laws being broken, why shouldn't it be investigated?

Regarding this:

Trust we will return the favour then and look into the US dealings
If it's a US subsidiary in the UK and subject to UK law and there is a reason to suspect something illegal, by all means investigate away.


I'm shocked that arms deals are being made. Shocked, I tell you.....
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.