Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Advice Required!

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Advice Required!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Jun 2007, 23:20
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: England
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up Advice Required!

I'm an AAC Crewman, fed up with the corps attitude towards us. I'd like to make the jump to Chinook crew. Can anyone out there give me some good int on whats required etc?
Trunk_Monkey is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2007, 23:46
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 250 ft agl
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What is their "attitude"? Be aware that you may not get any better from the RAF...

SMT
stickmonkeytamer is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2007, 23:48
  #3 (permalink)  
wokkameister
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Ok here goes.

OASC Cranwell. Standard Officer and Aircrew selection Centre stuff.

12 or so weeks on NCAITC at Cranwell. Initial type training/welcome to the RAF and some leadership/written and oral comms.

24 week generic course at Cranwell, where you learn a bit of rotary/FW and AEOp stuff. Then you are streamed. With your background, Id be suprised if you didnt go Rotary.

6 Week Rotary stream phase at Shawbury.

42 Weeks at DHFS on the MERW Course. (This may be getting condensed to 16 Weeks in the future). Streamed at the end of this to Type. THERE IS NO GUARANTEE YOU WILL GET YOUR CHOICE.

OCF, which in the case of the Wokka, is 6 Months. Then you make it onto a Sqn as LCR and begin the hard work.

Any of the gaps between the various elements may include a hold of anything up to 2-3 Months.

In short, you are looking at roughly 3 years to CR, and maybe not the aircraft you wanted. I would have a long think first mate, as life is no bed of roses over here either. The turd sandwich may have a sugar coating, but the filling still tastes the same.

Good luck with what ever you decide. If you want to come and visit or chat to the boys....PM me

WM
 
Old 11th Jun 2007, 06:42
  #4 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
wokka, quite right and what you did not say was that the AAC Crewman gunner job is but a fraction of the RW NCA aircrew job. As you pointed out there is no level transfer.

Then Trunk_Money omitted to say how old he is. He would not be the old AAC reaching timex with the Army refusing to sign him on. That may be the 'attitude' problem. Usually they will then be too old to transfer anyway.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2007, 07:08
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Falmouth
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Goodness me. Are you saying that to turn a AAC Crewman into a wokka crewman will take,

12 weeks +
24 weeks +
6 weeks +
42 weeks +
6 months..... approx 2 years !!!!! Tis no wonder the crabs are short of people. If its gonna take you 2 years matey I'd look at other options.
vecvechookattack is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2007, 07:32
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: A very long way North
Posts: 470
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Goodness me. Are you saying that to turn a AAC Crewman into a wokka crewman will take,

12 weeks +
24 weeks +
6 weeks +
42 weeks +
6 months..... approx 2 years !!!!! Tis no wonder the crabs are short of people. If its gonna take you 2 years matey I'd look at other options.
No it takes 2 years to turn a private/Cpl AAC Door Gunner into a Combat Ready RAF SNCO WSOp.

As Pontious points out, even if he ends up on RW, the two are really not the same, no matter what the Army may say.

I will concede that 42 weeks at DHFS is pushing it a bit though!
PlasticCabDriver is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2007, 08:31
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: England
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MEWR course for crewman will soon been tri-service. Furthermore, it will no longer be 42 weeks but around 16 (i think). In theory an AAC crewman having been through this system should be able to jump straight from AAC to RAF. My personal opinion is that they should still do OASC selection the same as everyone else then straight to an OCU. We should open these guys with open to arms, after all, each fleet is cyring out for manpower.
Currently, since none of the AAC crewman (that i'm aware of) have been through the MEWR route OASC followed by MERW then OCF would be the best route.
Door Slider is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2007, 04:28
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: England
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There's always one.

Many thanks, just one point to add though. I'm not bitter and twisted, the fact is that there is no career past Sgt for a crewman in the army. You don't always get flying pay, and you're limited on how much you can learn. It's strange how there is such a negative attitude towards crewman coming across from the army, but not towards a civviy joining the RAF. I know you like to think you're superior. Amazingly you're not, you just have more of a structure to your training. Most of us have operational experience, most are more than mature enough to take the Sgt rank and not turn into a plank. We also realise there is more to the job than ours, that's why i'd like to transfer. Some of us have already flown as part of crews on Chinook.

Again thanks to those for the relevant points, i'll be PM'ing those who offered for more advice.
Trunk_Monkey is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2007, 06:25
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: North of Down There!
Age: 52
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Trunk_Monkey,

We don't think we're superior, its just (as you're aware) that our RW crewman have a much more indepth, structured training syllabus. They have to carry out many more tasks on the whole than their Army counterparts.
I honestly believe that providing you come across with the right attitude you will be very much welcomed as the RAF could use all the help it can get and will use the experience you already have. You will definately have the advantage over other entrants and I'm sure that once in the training system you will be fast tracked through some parts of training that cover areas you already have experience in.
I'm not rotary but its worth speaking to the CIO and some of the guys at DHFS to get a feel for what crossing over will entail.
Best of luck mate.
Dave Angel is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2007, 09:01
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 71
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Best bet is give PMA 33c1 (the ALM/AEng Desk Officer) at RAF Innsworth a call. Think he might be on 95471-6165. The SHY cse will not be 42 weeks.
Roger the cabin boy is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2007, 11:53
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: firmly on dry land
Age: 81
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tm, PM please .
Wader2 is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2007, 15:48
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"the fact is that there is no career past Sgt for a crewman in the army."

TM,

PM me for some good news (potentially)!

AHV
AH Veteran is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.