Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

UAVs and King Airs for Army & RAF.

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

UAVs and King Airs for Army & RAF.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Jun 2007, 20:20
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Anywhere
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Strange how the AAC have guys already training then...



Shaun
timex is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2007, 20:41
  #22 (permalink)  
MLT
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lindum
Age: 47
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unless you are commenting on information in the public domain. I think conjecture on this subject should be kept to a minimum. The MOD have refused to comment, and probably for a very good reason.

Sorry for being a killjoy.

MLT
MLT is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2007, 06:00
  #23 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
What is the OPSEC issue as regards the cap badge(s) of the guys who operate these?

Equipment fit, mission capability, fair enough, but since it can only be RAF or Army there's not much to be gained by knowing which one
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2007, 15:53
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airborne artist.
Why can't the RN get involved?
Apart from the fact that we aren't stupid, of course.
Tourist is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2007, 10:33
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: an invisible moon
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why can't the RN get involved?
'Cos soon you won't have any carriers and it won't fit on a helideck?
Controversial Tim is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2007, 18:20
  #26 (permalink)  
Gnd
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Wiltshire
Age: 58
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MLT you are right so deleted all my comments for Leon Jabachjabicz
Gnd is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2007, 18:47
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Europa
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like 45 SQN will have it's work cut out then!

http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1053607/L
angelorange is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2007, 19:00
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
..is that registration for real!
Chris Kebab is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2007, 22:13
  #29 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,418
Received 1,593 Likes on 730 Posts
Got to wonder if the close proximity of the two orders is a coincidence, or a common specification and production line...

Iraqi Air Force orders King Air sensors
June 11, 2007

General Atomics Aeronautical Systems (GA-ASI) was awarded a contract to provide an initial lot of five integrated ISR sensor suites for Beechcraft King Air 350ER twin turboprop aircraft ordered by the new Iraqi Air Force.

The contract, which could be worth as much as $53 million, will see five aircraft equipped with GA-ASI Lynx IIE SAR/GMTI radar, an L-3 Communications/Wescam MX-15i electro-optical/infrared camera system, and CLAW sensor control and analysis software provided by Exclusive Charter Services of San Diego, Calif.

Linden Blue, president of GA-ASI’s reconnaissance systems unit, said the equipment integrates the sensors with an operator console station able to collect, format and display information. Imagery and other intelligence products can then be sent via airborne data link to ground stations.

Working through the U.S. Air Force’s Aeronautical Systems center at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Ohio, Iraq’s nascent defense ministry ordered six new King Air 350ERs — five for ISR and one for light transport — in March. Completion of the aircraft is slated for April 2008.
ORAC is online now  
Old 13th Jun 2007, 10:28
  #30 (permalink)  
gsa
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Wensleydale.
Posts: 127
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
It will be interesting who actually gets these. In the early eighties there was serious discussions for the AAC to be given some Canberras with Battlefield Radar but the politics wouldn't allow it.
gsa is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2007, 10:49
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
What are the politics of it?

The Army should operate on the land, the Royal Navy at sea and the Royal Air Force control the air element.
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2007, 10:58
  #32 (permalink)  
gsa
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Wensleydale.
Posts: 127
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
The Army should operate on the land, the Royal Navy at sea and the Royal Air Force control the air element.
Exactly the attitude why it didn't get further!!
gsa is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2007, 11:34
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
And what is wrong with that attitude?
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2007, 12:02
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Anywhere
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
And what is wrong with that attitude?
You've not done a Det at Sea have you?


Shaun
timex is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2007, 12:13
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
You've not done a Det at Sea have you?
Unfortunately yes I have, on more than one occassion.

Actually to be fair the RN were fantastic hosts and seem to really know what they are doing with their boats.

It just seems strange that some in the Army and RN have been bleating about disbanding the RAF for years after cherry picking the bits they want yet I've never heard of anyone in the RAF wanting a fleet of ships of our own or tanks to rumble around in.
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2007, 12:26
  #36 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
RAF wanting a fleet of ships of our own or tanks to rumble around in
You don't have to go far back to find that the RAF had light tanks (Scimitar) in the RAFR, and a bit further back the RAF operated some decent sized boats in the SAR role.
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2007, 12:45
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
Indeed the RAF did, but it no longer does.

The light armoured RAF Regiment squadrons were binned during Options For Change I believe as they duplicated a task already carried out by the British Army and the RAF motor launches at RAF Mount Batten were superseeded by SAR helicopters in their rescue role and RN assets for their target towing role.
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2007, 12:49
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: S England
Age: 54
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Army should operate on the land, the Royal Navy at sea and the Royal Air Force control the air element.
Mmmm. Where does that leave the RAF Regt in general. not just the CVR(T)'s (tanks as you call them. )
Chicken Leg is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2007, 12:58
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
Mmmm. Where does that leave the RAF Regt in general. not just the CVR(T)'s (tanks as you call them. )
The RAF Regt hasn't operated CVR(T)'s for quite a few years now. When I said 'tanks' I meant it in the MBT sense( back atcha).

As an ex-Rifleman myself I too am baffled by the continuing exsistance of the RAF Regt.
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2007, 13:05
  #40 (permalink)  
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,091
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone else remember that lovely Black and White film, "The Sea Shall Not Have Them"?

Ronald Shiner, I think, about ASR during the war in the Channel.
parabellum is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.