pretty ladies banned from nose art
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Falmouth
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In much the same vein then, someone better tell the Chinny fleet's own "Gloria Stitz" to hide her name badge. 
Guest
Posts: n/a
blogger.....you're a dick, good riddance. I've said it before, I'm sure you're some sort of wind up merchant. Any chance you can stop posting once you leave as well??
This is a piss-take surely.
This is a piss-take surely.
Last edited by XferSymbol; 5th Jun 2007 at 21:32. Reason: I misspelled 'posting' in shock at how much of a tw@t blogger is
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: kinloss
Age: 39
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
can't believe
Their worried about upsetting muslims.
I think the locals are more worried about the 500lb bomb landing on thier house then the ladies.
you should be at Kinloss
voluntary military run on a friday. BUT YOU HAVE TO GO NO EXCUSE.
makes it even worse im painter!
I love the RAF
Edited for swearing!
I think the locals are more worried about the 500lb bomb landing on thier house then the ladies.
you should be at Kinloss
voluntary military run on a friday. BUT YOU HAVE TO GO NO EXCUSE.
makes it even worse im painter!
I love the RAF
Edited for swearing!
Avoid imitations
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,609
Received 468 Likes
on
248 Posts
Yes, surely it should say: "If you can see this WE'RE ****ed".
Not to mention all that money wasted on such a huge fighter.
Not to mention all that money wasted on such a huge fighter.
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
How about a picture of Percy Parrott?
1. It's a bird.
2. It could say "who's a pretty boy then"
1. It's a bird.
2. It could say "who's a pretty boy then"
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: A lot closer to the sea
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It started with names only - not even silhouettes! I think the Sun did an appropriate two page spread picture showing the relevant girls with a Harrier in the background. The silhouettes came later, although it sounds like they've been taken off now which is a shame/pointless. 
Well done to the girls for sticking up for us though!
Outbreak of morale?- stamp on it at once!
Well done to the girls for sticking up for us though!
Outbreak of morale?- stamp on it at once!
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: ici
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I always thought that the best ones in recent times were those on the Victors during GW1 and on the PR9s during GW2 - presumably the same artist. Are there any links to those pics?
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: N Scotland
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't have a problem with the decision to ban paintings of half-dressed women on RAF aircraft. Its about respect for our female colleagues. Paintings of tiger teeth and other similar nose art is fine.
So no pretty girls as nose art. So I guess the Jag which had San and Tray, the 'Fat Slags' from Viz would be okay then!
The one's on the Victors were all painted by one of the groundcrew, and all the girls were the wives of Sqn personnel. 'Saucy Sue' was Mrs OC 55 Sqn and was originally called 'Slinky Sue', but from a distance it looked like "Stinky Sue!' It was renamed!
The one's on the Victors were all painted by one of the groundcrew, and all the girls were the wives of Sqn personnel. 'Saucy Sue' was Mrs OC 55 Sqn and was originally called 'Slinky Sue', but from a distance it looked like "Stinky Sue!' It was renamed!
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by AC Ovee
I don't have a problem with the decision to ban paintings of half-dressed women on RAF aircraft. Its about respect for our female colleagues. Paintings of tiger teeth and other similar nose art is fine.
