Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Are Master Aircrew Warrant Officers?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Are Master Aircrew Warrant Officers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Jun 2007, 14:10
  #81 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: canada
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Another cause for confusion - warrant officers, not themselves SNCOs, use the Sergeants' Mess. When on a US base, and thus entitled to use the O=club they often chose to remain with the SNCOs.
I believe that the correct title for the mess is the Warrant Officers' and Sergeants' Mess.
RODF3 is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2007, 14:31
  #82 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy

Roush: I've been lucky enough to have been holding an RAF post within the USAF for the past three years and have never had a single issue. The enlisted (E9 included) address me as Sir and the commissioned ranks address me as Mr. Best rank in the Air Force.
I'm just surprised that the British Armed Forces do not fully recognize the status of US Warrant Officers when a USAF E9 is expected to address a British Warrant Officer of the same status as 'Sir'.
Chief_Two is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2007, 14:40
  #83 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: .....................................
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh dear chief feeling a little inferior?
I bet you drive a big fast car to make up for it though.
samuraimatt is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2007, 14:59
  #84 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kammbronn
Posts: 2,122
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I'm just surprised that the British Armed Forces do not fully recognize the status of US Warrant Officers......
You shouldn't be, after all, you've had it explained ad nauseam both here and on ARRSE over the last God knows how many months that we do recognise your status.

I'm sure you'll ask again, since your posting history would suggest that you seem to be heading this way; as you don't hold The Queen's commission, you don't get saluted by Brits.

Last edited by diginagain; 5th Jun 2007 at 15:51.
diginagain is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2007, 17:29
  #85 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 64
Posts: 2,278
Received 37 Likes on 15 Posts
I had a friend in the US Army, he almost made CW2, but McDonalds stopped issuing the tokens when he was 3 short.

"Never mind I said", I am sure they will repeat the promotion next year.


Chief_Two - Here is the only salute you warrant from the Brits:


Now please go forth and multiply.
ZH875 is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2007, 18:34
  #86 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation

ZH875

Let's avoid personal abuse. However I would still like an answer to my question.

Roush: I've been lucky enough to have been holding an RAF post within the USAF for the past three years and have never had a single issue. The enlisted (E9 included) address me as Sir and the commissioned ranks address me as Mr. Best rank in the Air Force. Chief_Two: ....a USAF E9 is expected to address a British Warrant Officer of the same status as 'Sir'.
Why??
Chief_Two is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2007, 18:38
  #87 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 64
Posts: 2,278
Received 37 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by Chief_Two
ZH875

Let's avoid personal abuse.
How about "Let's avoid the same old question from the same Chief"?

BTW that wasn't abuse.....
ZH875 is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2007, 18:52
  #88 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Buckinghamshire
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Chief Two

Coalition forces are fighting and losing their lives on a daily basis in wars that most of them didn't want to even be a part of and all you seem to care about is who should salute who(m).

Go away and get a life you sad bloody individual.


Last edited by Bigwings; 5th Jun 2007 at 18:54. Reason: Spelling
Bigwings is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2007, 19:32
  #89 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Coalition forces are fighting and losing their lives on a daily basis in wars that most of them didn't want to even be a part of
I'm very aware
Chief_Two is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2007, 19:39
  #90 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: North of Down There!
Age: 52
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chief_Two
I'm very aware
Of the fact you are not endearing yourself to the rest of the military world I hope.
Dave Angel is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2007, 20:18
  #91 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: .....................................
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
chief if you write to Air Chief Marshal Sir Glenn Torpy KCB CBE DSO BSc(Eng) FRAeS RAF, I am sure he will give you the time of day to answer your very important question. It's not like he has other stuff to sort out and I am sure he will be so glad you have brought this world shattering non saluting problem to his attention.

If you don't want to do that then maybe you could just sod off.

Oh BTW have you tried asking on Rum Ration. The Royal Marines have Warrant Officers.

Here is the link http://www.rumration.co.uk/cpgn2/ind...e=royal_marine enjoy

Whoops nearly forgot. You could also try asking on e-goat. That's the unofficial RAF website. There are more currently serving people on that site.

http://www.e-goat.co.uk/forums/cmps_index.php enjoy again
samuraimatt is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2007, 21:14
  #92 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: England
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well you did mention the Navy

Just to complicate matters!!!!

The warrant officer corps began in the 13th century in the nascent English Royal Navy. At that time, noblemen with military experience took command of the new Navy, adopting the military ranks of lieutenant and captain. These officers often had no knowledge of life on board a ship — let alone how to navigate such a vessel — and relied on the expertise of the ship's Master and other seamen who tended to the technical aspects of running the ship. As cannon came into use, the officers also required gunnery experts.

These sailors became indispensable to the running of the ship and were rewarded with a royal warrant. The warrant was a special designation, designed to set them apart from other sailors, yet not violate the class system that was prevalent during the time.

Nevertheless, while the class distinctions embodied by the distinction between commission and warrant were important at Court and in society both at home and abroad, on board ship a person's status has always depended more on the practical importance of the job that he did rather than the formalities of commission or warrant. Admiralty commissions were therefore never accorded the unique status that the Queen's commission holds in the Army, and in the hierarchy of a Royal Navy ship important warrant officers such as the Master would outrank commissioned officers such as the marine Lieutenants.
EODFelix is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2007, 21:34
  #93 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: ZS - 119.30
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dare I add this...

A WO in the SA Air Force (which has its military etiquette & traditions based on the RAF) does not get saluted, so if you're a RAF Master Aircrew or WO planning a visit to South Africa please don't expect to get saluted...
Fish Eagle is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2007, 21:41
  #94 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: I have no idea but the view's great.
Posts: 1,272
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
I have no specific agenda. However, due to possible misunderstandings, I think that WO ranks in other NATO armies should be more closely aligned with those in the US Armed Forces.
I think that is a specific agenda.

Why, when NATO has 26 member states, should we all pander to the whims of one?

Now, shall we clear this one up - You don't hold the Queen's Commission, I wouldn't salute your rank, live with it, there are more important things in life.

ENDEX
J.A.F.O. is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2007, 21:44
  #95 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: ZS - 119.30
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well said sire....
Fish Eagle is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2007, 21:50
  #96 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: West Oxfordshire
Age: 57
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
dream on

Anyone that thinks that an Army WO compares in any way with an RAF WO is seriously deluded. Most of the ones I had any dealings with were probably at Chief/FS level at best.
oxoneil is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2007, 22:20
  #97 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: England
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I take it that CW2 is US Army as USAF does not have use the warrant officers rank:

The USAF inherited warrant officer ranks from the Army at its inception in 1947, but their place in the Air Force structure was never made clear. The US Air Force stopped appointing warrant officers in 1959, the same year the first promotions were made to the new top enlisted grade, Chief Master Sergeant. Most of the existing US Air Force warrant officers entered the commissioned officer ranks during the 1960s, but tiny numbers continued to exist for the next 21 years.

The last active duty Air Force warrant officer, CWO-4 James H. Long, retired in 1980 and the last Air Force Reserve warrant officer, CWO-4 Bob Barrow, retired in 1992. Since then, the Air Force warrant officer ranks, while still authorized by law, are not used.
EODFelix is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2007, 02:28
  #98 (permalink)  
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,095
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What a sheltered life you have led oxoneil!
parabellum is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2007, 07:33
  #99 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Deciding whether I am retired or unemployed
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oxoneil - I can't agree.

Anyone that thinks that an Army WO compares in any way with an RAF WO is seriously deluded. Most of the ones I had any dealings with were probably at Chief/FS level at best.
Oxoneil, While I can't get too wound-up with the Chief's ramblings I have to take the bait with your last one-liner. Well into my 4th decade as a light blue it is my delight to work with a couple of Royal Signals WOs at least 15 years my junior. You couldn't ask for better, more professional, individuals. The other Army WOs (1 & 2) I come across during my normal duties are all from the same mould. Their promotion system encourages excellence; WO1 then commission or out at aged 40.
It's Not Working is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2007, 08:21
  #100 (permalink)  
Hellbound
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Blighty
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yep, kinda agree with that one. Worked very closely with some WO2s (all around 30 years old) recently and was gobsmacked at how bright, hardworking and switched on they were. Put my inappropriate preconceptions in their place. Clearly only a narrow group I worked with, but closer to RAF junior officers than RAF WOs in my view.

RAF WOs have the benefit of much more experience and are generally a different beast - I would not seek to compare the 2!
South Bound is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.