Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Tornado Reheat Question

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Tornado Reheat Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th May 2007, 17:13
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK, my final (you'll be all pleased to hear!) word. A Tornado F3, in 'Light Combat' Fit at Max Reheat takes about 3000-3500 Ft to get to Unstick. Since Max Dry power is broadly half of max reheat, we can assume that the roll would be about twice as long, ie. 7000Ft. So, It would be possible to take off on a 9000Ft runway in dry power, but, and it's a BIG but, your take off safety margins in the event of a rejected take off would be non existant! One shot deal, any problems and you've had it. You wouldn't even to be able to take the overrun cable! (Too Fast for weight).

So, although theoretically 'possible'....... 'actually' very stupid. In a similar way, it is 'possible' to walk slowly accross the M1 blindfolded.

Please feel free to use any technique you like, but for me it's 2 good burners or nothing.

Regards to All,

Advo
advocatusDIABOLI is offline  
Old 15th May 2007, 21:07
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chippenham, Wilts
Age: 75
Posts: 297
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down GR1/4 v Burners?

It's somewhat imotive. I remember seeing a situation when, at Bruggen, a IX Sqn GR1, operating from the southern taxiway, get's airborne but, looses a burner; "lummy days" he put the bloody thing back down on the ground and engages the RHAG!! Worst bit of adhering to the pre-take off brief I ever saw in all my life. They know who they were!

3P.

Last edited by threeputt; 16th May 2007 at 14:46. Reason: RHAG v PUAG!
threeputt is offline  
Old 22nd May 2007, 14:38
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Exiled in England
Age: 48
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
that must have been fun.

I was in akrotiri with 11 and we had a hlwscu failure and jammed the waggly wings at 45 degrees. fast landing, I believe the grobag broke the wheelbrakes and so used his nuts to stop the rot.
cornish-stormrider is offline  
Old 22nd May 2007, 15:04
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can't remember the exact numbers but believe the ooomph in full burner is about 60% greater than max dry. Who was it that coined the phrase(corny)'See those needles swing, feel those babies bite' Yuk!!
jonesthepilot is offline  
Old 22nd May 2007, 15:29
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: South
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
3P - Not me!
bowly is offline  
Old 22nd May 2007, 16:57
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: St Sardos, France
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice panorama of the Kilpatrick Hills in the video, quite a few WW2 cabs still up there (in pieces)
It doesnt matter about dry/reheat T/O if the wings are still swept!!! as some of the girlschool so nearly found out once......
mojocvh is offline  
Old 24th May 2007, 19:54
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: north
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
jonesthepilot

It's closer to say max dry thrust is about 60% of max reheat.
L Peacock is offline  
Old 24th May 2007, 20:01
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,822
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
1.67 x f*ck all is still f*ck all! Just noisier.
BEagle is offline  
Old 24th May 2007, 20:18
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Beagle, what a pity.... you usually speak sense and reality.

Advo
advocatusDIABOLI is offline  
Old 25th May 2007, 07:36
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,822
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
Banter, me old, nothing more....

Is that still allowed in today's grey PC world?
BEagle is offline  
Old 25th May 2007, 10:43
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: front seat, facing forwards
Posts: 1,158
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
As a mere aside...

I did 3 years at Cottesmore on TTTE where we flew exclusively clean aircraft (not even pylons) and despite having only the 101 engines fitted which had less reheat thrust but the same dry power (I think ???) I always wondered whether we could take-off in dry power and if anyone had ever worked out the figures. It certainly felt like you could.

I do understand the banter about weedy thrust, but I did once have a genuine 590kts in dry power at low level out of a GR1, and that wasn't at the end of a dive or anything, just low level RTB from Donna Nook and forgot I'd left them at Max Dry.
just another jocky is offline  
Old 25th May 2007, 11:00
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Deepest Darkest
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Banter, me old, nothing more....

Is that still allowed in today's grey PC world?"



You can't call it that...it's a paler shade of charcoal!
DSAA is offline  
Old 25th May 2007, 18:15
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Midlands
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
just another jocky,

You were doing well indeed to squeeze that from a TTTE jet with 101's!

As I remember, the 101's only had something like 8000lbs thrust in Dry range, whereas the 103's had around 9600lbs eventually, post the 8% compressor mods.

Good work fella!!


Flipflopman
flipflopman RB199 is offline  
Old 27th May 2007, 07:40
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Oop North (where the beer is best)
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surely the old saying:

"The three most useless things in flying are height above you, runway behind you and one second ago"

still count?

I've never had the inclination to find out whether anything can take off on less than max power.

"There are old pilots and there are bold pilots, but there are very few old bold pilots."

BackfromIraq is offline  
Old 27th May 2007, 12:14
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: England
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've never had the inclination to find out whether anything can take off on less than max power.
Nine out of ten take-off runs you've every experienced on an airliner will have been with much less than maximum thrust. But I guess there are no derate figures for FJs
Brain Potter is offline  
Old 27th May 2007, 20:31
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: north
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Combat, bleed off or max reheat, bleed on are both approved techniques.
L Peacock is offline  
Old 28th May 2007, 00:12
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Midlands
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Combat, bleed off or max reheat, bleed on are both approved techniques.
With respect LP, those are not really in the same order as a rated take off, and are not in theirselves classed as a 'derate' figure for the Tornado

Tornado's nearest to a rated take off must be a 'Low' selected datum with ECS selected 'ON'

Even this though, as I'm sure you'll agree, is in a different league to a 744 EPR 'Rated' take off.

Flipflopman
flipflopman RB199 is offline  
Old 28th May 2007, 08:59
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: north
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
flip flop

It was just a point of interest really.
BTW, I'm told the datum switch stays in the low position these days.
L Peacock is offline  
Old 28th May 2007, 12:25
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LP, you are right. The 'Carlos Fandango' (Datum) switch stays firmly wirelocked in Low. The reason for this, is that after certain 'modifications', selection of High would give the F3 an unacceptable power advantage over the Typhoon.

Now we wouldn't want that, would we?

Advo

PS- 101 Dry - 8400lb 103 (With 106 Compressor) Dry - 9400lb. Max RH (ISA Sea level) 17,600lb.
advocatusDIABOLI is offline  
Old 28th May 2007, 16:28
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Exiled in England
Age: 48
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wasn't the decu datum switch set to give an extra XX degrees of temp in the combustion chamber?? and then didn't putting the PLA to combat give another XX on top?? Didn't know if the figures were not for public display or not. I do remember when we redatumed all the decus on 11sqn the first 4 ship of monday morning took off with comments of sporty jets etc and came back to 4 sets of double boro's front to back. My mate Billy wasn't a happy sootie.
cornish-stormrider is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.