Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

I'm lovin' it

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Apr 2007, 12:34
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 684
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
I'm lovin' it

Smelling salts for BEagle, please.

Ah, Comrade. Corporate branding: sign of the Capitalist Free West.
hoodie is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2007, 12:41
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Under a stone
Age: 68
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nearly as bad as the white elephant that was stencil painted next to the door of a Nimrod AEW3 while deployed for an air show at Lossie a good few years ago.

I feel a thread change coming on - whats the worst thing that YOU have seen painted onto an aircraft?
Release-Authorised is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2007, 12:47
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,807
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
Yes, I suppose it'll make it easier for the terminally dim-witted to establish who owns the ancient aeroplanes carrying this silly and wholly pointless logo.
I would have thought that the union flag provided a bit of a clue?

Last edited by BEagle; 24th Apr 2007 at 14:25.
BEagle is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2007, 14:07
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Lincs
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes BEagle, but isn't it absolutely great to see that those wonderful airship people have got their priorities so correct, don't you think?

I mean, never mind about directiing funds to ISK to keep our Nimrod fleet alive; and lets not worry that our soldiers don't have enough ammo and proper kit; No, sod them all, lets get those aircraft painted up and sorted out to show the world that they belong to em.......oh yes, the Royal (Bankrupt) Air Farce!

To the boys and girls at ISK who will undoubtedly see this and be wondering why? May I apologise on behalf of the half-brained idiot who decided upon this latest waste of valuable money. Its great isn't it having a cammo' colour scheme only to have a bloody great sign saying RAF plastered on it. God, I despair, whatever next?

Infact, I might just go and start another thread entitled 'What will the fools in charge of the RAF come up with next?' should get a few postings me thinks!

Good afternoon to all
TSM
The Swinging Monkey is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2007, 14:30
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,807
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
No doubt some pony-tailed graphic arts conceptual designer was paid a squillion blatts to come up with such a wunnerful corporate logo?

Another prize piece of work from MoD to match:

1. The oil paintings acquired for the MoD box.
2. The comfy chairs acquired for same.
3. The plasma screen TVs acquired for same.
4. The 'leisure clothing' range.
5. Spirit of Adventure aircraftless air shows. Neither of which are being held at RAF aerodromes.......

BEagle is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2007, 15:08
  #6 (permalink)  
6Z3
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: God's Country
Posts: 646
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Believe the RN logo was a snip at £40K, wonder what this one cost?
6Z3 is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2007, 15:20
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Worst Paint Job

I feel a thread change coming on - whats the worst thing that YOU have seen painted onto an aircraft?
I will offer a starter of the 23 Sqn logo on the tail of ZH103 for the squadrons 90th anniversary last year. It must have taken great artistic ability to paint it such that it looked like it had been painted years ago; it was (and still is) so faded.


8 Sqn tail art

the other side

Y_G



Photos courtesy of Airliners.net

Last edited by Yeller_Gait; 24th Apr 2007 at 15:45.
Yeller_Gait is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2007, 15:29
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Elsewhere
Posts: 289
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Links don't work.
k3k3 is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2007, 15:31
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So will the Tri-Stars that had their markings toned down/removed to stop them looking British and attracting unwanted attention in warm places have this painted on the nose to remove all doubt about who operates them?
speeddial is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2007, 17:23
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: west london
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One of the first C130Js to arrive at Boscombe for MAR a few years ago had a Mayfly drawn on the nose....It may fly, it may not!
ATCO17 is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2007, 18:57
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In the Doghouse
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What happened to the logo " ROYAL AIR FORCE TRANSPORT COMMAND " ?
Ok , it was a long time ago , when we flew to places far and wide ......... and the RAF was a respected force .
sled dog is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2007, 20:07
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Muscat, Oman
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Could someone remind me who our CEO is these days. I used to think it was just the other Sqn on the base that was the cowboy outfit, now I realise it's the whole damn company!

Anybody out there still short of body armour or desert camouflage?
Ali Barber is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2007, 20:29
  #13 (permalink)  
wokkameister
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Can't move for desert DPM or body armour now. Haven't got any aircraft/spares or coherent leadership.
Not sure it was a fair swap!
 
Old 24th Apr 2007, 22:29
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 2 m South of Radstock VRP
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mein Gott!

Since when did military aircraft, particularly of the world's first air force, carry bloody logos?

On the subject of grey Nimrods, does anyone remember how much research money resulted in them and some of the tankers being painted overall hemp?
GOLF_BRAVO_ZULU is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2007, 23:40
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: South of the ex-North Devon flying club. North of Isca.
Age: 48
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Isn't it the same shade of grey as the AT fleet?

Or maybe it's just some nice french painter fellow got a job lot on the cheap at the local le'B&Q!
Fluffy Bunny is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2007, 00:14
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: at the end of the bar
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Haven't the AT Fleet ALREADY got a great big 'Royal Air Force' written on the side?

Am I cynical in thinking this new logo is positioned just where it will be visible on TV broadcasts of people disembarking?
XV277 is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2007, 00:21
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: On Resettlement
Age: 55
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What is all of the fuss about.

Is it just me, or have we been painting a Roundel and the words Royal Air Force (or Royal Navy, perhaps Army too) on our aircraft for quite some time? Hardly NEWS, and I hate the new font too.

I find it saddening that their Air-ships are currently so paranoid about the RAF being absorbed within (one or both) of the other Services that they have to persist with these futile gestures:
Erroneously adopting the Roundel (which signifies a British mil aircraft of ANY Service) as an RAF 'logo' .

Expeditionary Air Wings. (For fixed bases?!) What is wrong with identifying Squadrons as 'packets' of air power?

AIR Command! Whatever.
If the RAF et al. are going to be combined as a general defence force, a la the Canadian experiment, none of this pontificating is going to matter a jot.
MadAxeMan is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2007, 09:00
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: A lot closer to the sea
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The FAA and AAC always had their service written on the side to make sure nobody made the grave error of thinking they were RAF. It was thought that having a UK roundel and being a military aircraft would be sufficient to identify the RAF in the majority of cases. In these days of branding and corporate logos I guess it's not as obvious to the paying public.

Mind you - they didn't let 800 NAS/Naval Strike Wing put Royal Navy on their GR7/9s.
WhiteOvies is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2007, 09:10
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SX in SX in UK
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The time to start worrying is when they say that you should all be running at a profit. Each station/squadron/unit/etc etc becomes a profit centre rather than a cost centre.
Kolibear is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2007, 09:17
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Witney UK
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The hemp colour scheme was devised by a grossly underpaid boffin, a Mr Barley of Barley Grey fame, working out of a wooden shack at Farnborough. Their world was just as badly treated as todays serving military. Now of course it is a commercial organization called Septic or something and making a fortune for its bosses.
Art Field is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.