Hi Vis Jackets
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Over the moors
Hi Vis Jackets
Hi All
I have just been informed by my friendly groundcrew that I really should be wearing a Hi Vis jacket when walking to the aircraft to go flying.
Personnally, anyone who doesn't see/hear an aircraft coming towards them on the pan deserves to get run over. Apart from that I wondered if anyone here knows of any flight safety implications of wearing hi vis jackets near/in aircraft!?
Look forward to the responses
OS
I have just been informed by my friendly groundcrew that I really should be wearing a Hi Vis jacket when walking to the aircraft to go flying.
Personnally, anyone who doesn't see/hear an aircraft coming towards them on the pan deserves to get run over. Apart from that I wondered if anyone here knows of any flight safety implications of wearing hi vis jackets near/in aircraft!?
Look forward to the responses
OS
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
From: Wiltshire
If you are a civi then the H&S (SHEFF) will vapourise you if you don't have one. In the Mil, you should be more worried about bullets (or bl-unties) so Hi-Viz vests aren't needed - unless - you have a head shed that has no balls!!
A well known Hampshire base had them, then a man took over and they don't any more.
Pooh-Bar to the PC brigade!!!
A well known Hampshire base had them, then a man took over and they don't any more.
Pooh-Bar to the PC brigade!!!
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 1
From: Exiled in England
G/crew, it was a hanging offence not to wear one. we used to get shiny new ones and age them by washing them in mud OM15 and avtur, very tactical
Never saw a grobag wearing gibbon in one, ever......Mind you it was such a long walk from the minibus to the HAS.
Never saw a grobag wearing gibbon in one, ever......Mind you it was such a long walk from the minibus to the HAS.

Joined: Sep 2006
Aviation Qualifications: Military
Posts: 6,024
Likes: 102
From: Somewhere flat
At a Lincolnshire airbase, FSW Orders mandate the wearing of hi-vis vests on the dispearsal, and I understand that some groundcrew have fallen foul of the rule. The aircrew "should" wear them, but many refuse because they think that they are above all that (or too idle to put theirs on). The only chap to have been hit by a crew bus while walking on the dispearsal was infact wearing hi-vis and this is used as a reason not to wear it. However, I consider that it is like not wearing a seat belt in the days before compulsion - if you get hit and you were NOT wearing one then I expect that any compensation due would be markedly reduced. Indeed, I expect that the driver would sue you for the distress that your negligence had caused him!
Bottom line - it costs nothing to wear one, so why not - if you get hit you will get more money! Its like the thread on whether to wear gloves or not.
Bottom line - it costs nothing to wear one, so why not - if you get hit you will get more money! Its like the thread on whether to wear gloves or not.


Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
From: UK
I used to keep mine neatly folded in my boot pocket of my flying suit, always donned it on the the apron the minute i left the A/c and only took it off once away from the a/c and where no blind idiots operated i.e off the flightline, it costs nowt to wear one (only 10 seconds to don one) and one day you might be glad you were wearing it........
The fact you have asked the questions suggests doubt, so "if there`s doubt, then theres NO DOUBT"
The fact you have asked the questions suggests doubt, so "if there`s doubt, then theres NO DOUBT"
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: Bris Vegas Australia
I can remember the spams wearing them (flouro belts vice vests) at Ali during Resinate South....They used to call them sniper aiding devices....In fact the real cynics used to wear two crossed over to better mark the heart for the snipers!
All banter aside, we wear a flouro belt to-from the chariot down here nowadays.
All banter aside, we wear a flouro belt to-from the chariot down here nowadays.
JetBlast member 2005.
JetBlast member 2006.
Banned 2007
JetBlast member 2006.
Banned 2007
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: The US of A - sort of
I have just been informed by my friendly groundcrew that I really should be wearing a Hi Vis jacket when walking to the aircraft to go flying.
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere
G/crew, it was a hanging offence not to wear one. we used to get shiny new ones and age them by washing them in mud OM15 and avtur, very tactical
Never saw a grobag wearing gibbon in one, ever......Mind you it was such a long walk from the minibus to the HAS.
Never saw a grobag wearing gibbon in one, ever......Mind you it was such a long walk from the minibus to the HAS.
How did we manage for all those years without them? (Hi viz vests that is!)
If the theory is right, there must have been dead bodies all over the pan for years....
Guest
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 180
Aaaaaaaaaaarrghh, you may laugh, but over here in a certain commenwealth country known for excessive politeness, there are indeed cammo field jackets with high vis strips on for those that have to work in an area where hi-viz jackets are required! Hilarious to see!
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 1,932
Likes: 13
From: England
The aircrew "should" wear them, but many refuse because they think that they are above all that (or too idle to put theirs on).
g stupid on a camouflage uniform!! This is H&SAW madness. Heathrow, maybe - V busy out there. Brize with its one movement every half hour?!?I saw a bunch of IOT cadets at the College a while ago marching to work. A flight of about 20 of them. They were all in DPM kit and carrying webbing with their high vis jackets draped over the back of each rucksack. Military bearing - I don't think so! The chaps on the back rank might be acceptable, but all of them!!
Grow up, we are supposed to be the military not a bunch of road workers.I'm with Gnd on this one. HSAW is about risk ASSESSMENT. If you think the risk is already negligable (and lets face it just how many personnel have been run over by aircraft or vehicles on the apron?) then that should suffice. This is another example of jumping on the "civilian best practice" instead of applying common sense. It's all about awareness and application of a bit of common sense.
Oh and as Gnd said, we need a few more men to take over and challenge the HSAW nonsense.
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
From: door or ramp, don't mind.
not only for the obvious H&S rubbish but also for security considerations. not too sure about the logic behind that though.

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 353
Likes: 2
From: United Kingdom
Hi-vis are in for those not walking to crew in to their aircraft where I am despite an engineer having one sucked into rotating components during a ground test.
The H & S nazis didn't think about the loose flappy ends for maintainers when they did their risk assesment for this one.
The H & S nazis didn't think about the loose flappy ends for maintainers when they did their risk assesment for this one.

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 41
From: UK
Long ago when the RAF first started to go "green" the first Hi Vis feature was the cross of reflective tape applied to our bone domes. One of our number felt that this should be improved upon and wrote an L.G. Groves submission for "Toned Down Reflective Tape". He was however a little concerned when it became apparent that someone further up the food chain was taking it seriously!
I remember the night at Wyton when a crew bus nearly took out a crew on the ORP. Hi Vis vests might have made that less exciting! As was said above there is no doubt that wearing Hi Vis clothing on the ramp at a busy airport is a very wise move regardless of the element of compulsion. But with military operations there will come a time when it is definitely unwise to wear Hi Vis and if you are to operate safely in that environment then people must be fully aware of the problems and difficulties. To do that you must train for it and therin lies the problem, who is going to accept the risk?
Good luck and stay safe.
YS
I remember the night at Wyton when a crew bus nearly took out a crew on the ORP. Hi Vis vests might have made that less exciting! As was said above there is no doubt that wearing Hi Vis clothing on the ramp at a busy airport is a very wise move regardless of the element of compulsion. But with military operations there will come a time when it is definitely unwise to wear Hi Vis and if you are to operate safely in that environment then people must be fully aware of the problems and difficulties. To do that you must train for it and therin lies the problem, who is going to accept the risk?
Good luck and stay safe.
YS

Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 6,209
Likes: 2
From: north of barlu
Bit of common ?
Hi vis vests on the ramp at night or in very lo vis......... Yes!
Hi vis vests on the ramp on a bright day.........No!
The problem is that this requires thought and the H&S nazis can't let any of us think for our selfs.
Hi vis vests on the ramp on a bright day.........No!
The problem is that this requires thought and the H&S nazis can't let any of us think for our selfs.
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
From: Earth
Yellow Sun,
Surely the cross of reflective tape on a bonedome is not for "green reasons", but for survival situations when you will require more profile; say, in an evening aquatic survival situation. Aircrew employed on operational Land Manoeuvre malarkey use a strip of 'Harry Black Maskers' to cover up the reflective bits.
This stops the enemy finding you.
At homebase, however, the bowser driver gets a better than even chance to run you down.
S2
Surely the cross of reflective tape on a bonedome is not for "green reasons", but for survival situations when you will require more profile; say, in an evening aquatic survival situation. Aircrew employed on operational Land Manoeuvre malarkey use a strip of 'Harry Black Maskers' to cover up the reflective bits.
This stops the enemy finding you.
At homebase, however, the bowser driver gets a better than even chance to run you down.
S2



