Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

PPRuNe mentioned in the House of Commons

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

PPRuNe mentioned in the House of Commons

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Apr 2007, 17:05
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bridgwater Somerset
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up PPRuNe mentioned in the House of Commons

My Local MP Mr. Liddell-Grainger (ex Army Major) asked questions about the Nimrod and its replacement on the 17th April 2007.
http://www.publications.parliament.u...70417h0007.htm

17 Apr 2007 : Column 48WH
Military Procurement

Here is an extract.
The morale of aircrews on Nimrods is pretty close to rock bottom these days. If he has not already done so, I invite the Minister to take a look at the Professional Pilots Rumour Network at www.pprune.org. I would not normally suggest that a Minister should look at a rumour-mongering site, but that one is interesting, because it involves the airmen themselves. It cannot, of course, be relied on to tell the whole truth, but the airmen are using it as a valve for internal grumbles. I should like to quote from a pilot’s entry of a few weeks back:

"I’ve served 6 months away each year in the Sand, every year for the last 4 years. But that didn’t knock my morale anywhere near as much as crewing in at 0400 but not getting flying until 1700.”

The Nimrod is becoming the RAF’s Skoda. The men want to fly, but I am afraid that the plane is clapped out. I should like to bring another entry to the Chamber’s attention:
    Even if only a small proportion of those stories are true, there is a major problem to which I hope the Minister and the Government will own up and say, “We need to cough up.” We must not and should not put aircrews at risk because the kites that they are flying are beyond their sell-by dates. We should never put anything into the air that does not have the proper equipment inside it.

    Hot stuff !!!!!!!

    One of The Minister of State, Ministry of Defence (Mr. Adam Ingram) replies was :

    The loss of the Nimrod XV230 in Afghanistan with the loss of life of the 14 military personnel on board was unquestionably a tragic incident. Such incidents serve to remind us of the risks that our servicemen and women take across the world every day. The loss of an airframe inevitably means that it is more difficult to
    meet front-line requirements—that is the nature and the hard logic of the matter. However, the Nimrod personnel and aircraft are meeting their operational commitments and continue to do an excellent job. Of a fleet of 15 aircraft, nine are typically available to the front line. The remainder are being modified or in deep servicing. Four are deployed on operations overseas, and five are available in the UK to be used at short notice.

    Mmmmm
    Tappers Dad is offline  
    Old 20th Apr 2007, 17:27
      #2 (permalink)  
     
    Join Date: Mar 2007
    Location: Bristol Temple Meads
    Posts: 869
    Likes: 0
    Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
    "Nine are typically available to the front line" Who supplied the minister with this data?

    DV
    Distant Voice is offline  
    Old 20th Apr 2007, 17:54
      #3 (permalink)  
    Red On, Green On
     
    Join Date: May 2004
    Location: Between the woods and the water
    Age: 24
    Posts: 6,487
    Likes: 0
    Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
    The Nimrod is becoming the RAF’s Skoda
    Which is a fairly stupid analogy, given that Skodas frequently are high up the customer satisfaction charts.
    airborne_artist is offline  
    Old 20th Apr 2007, 20:28
      #4 (permalink)  
     
    Join Date: Jul 2006
    Location: bristol
    Age: 56
    Posts: 1,051
    Likes: 0
    Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
    Thank you for the update

    TAPPER'S DAD

    Keep up the good work. Thank you for this update, and well done to your M.P.

    Barnstormer1968
    barnstormer1968 is offline  
    Old 20th Apr 2007, 20:50
      #5 (permalink)  
     
    Join Date: Feb 2003
    Location: earth
    Posts: 1,397
    Likes: 0
    Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
    We should never put anything into the air that does not have the proper equipment inside it.
    Be not too many RAF aircraft airborne then!
    soddim is offline  
    Old 20th Apr 2007, 20:56
      #6 (permalink)  
     
    Join Date: Feb 2003
    Location: Scotland
    Posts: 142
    Likes: 0
    Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
    2 in the circuit today.Another taxied out,lined up,almost powered up and then taxied back to dispersal and shut down.
    ranger703 is offline  
    Old 20th Apr 2007, 22:46
      #7 (permalink)  
     
    Join Date: Apr 2002
    Location: Over the sea and far away
    Posts: 111
    Likes: 0
    Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
    nine are typically available to the front line
    DV, please note this carefully phrased ministerial comment. Adam Ingram did not say 9 serviceable Nimrods were available to the Front Line, merely 9 Nimrods.

    Nine serviceable Nimrods is quite obviously make-believe, just like Father Christmas and the tooth fairy.
    Mr Point is offline  
    Old 22nd Apr 2007, 11:09
      #8 (permalink)  
     
    Join Date: Jun 2003
    Location: Answers on a postcard to, er....
    Posts: 95
    Likes: 0
    Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
    Which is a fairly stupid analogy, given that Skodas frequently are high up the customer satisfaction charts.
    Which shows how out of touch and overpaid MP's are!
    Hot Charlie is offline  
    Old 22nd Apr 2007, 19:29
      #9 (permalink)  
     
    Join Date: Apr 2007
    Location: Cornwall
    Posts: 17
    Likes: 0
    Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
    The loss of an airframe inevitably means that it is more difficult to
    meet front-line requirements..........

    What about the loss of the crew!

    Last edited by helgar33; 30th Apr 2007 at 08:28. Reason: recent news stories
    helgar33 is offline  

    Posting Rules
    You may not post new threads
    You may not post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is Off
    Trackbacks are Off
    Pingbacks are Off
    Refbacks are Off



    Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

    Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.