Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Osprey done in by chip

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Osprey done in by chip

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Feb 2007, 15:21
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Osprey done in by chip

This chip in the flight control computer has V-22's temporarily grounded. Seems that a "minor change" 4 years ago wasn't so minor.
barit1 is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2007, 16:17
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: On the outside looking in
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not BAES, but
BAE had used a "functionally identical" chip
has been a problem before around these parts.

And given that Mil Spec isn't nearly as popular as it was before, will probably happen again somewhere.

sw
Safeware is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2007, 19:34
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Closer than you think...
Age: 65
Posts: 390
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not BAES, but

BAE had used a "functionally identical" chip
has been a problem before around these parts.

And given that Mil Spec isn't nearly as popular as it was before, will probably happen again somewhere.

sw
No knows at this point how many of the 150-plus computers installed on the operational V-22s contain the defective chip. Before 2003, Darcy said, BAE had used a "functionally identical" chip made by another manufacturer. Tests showed that there was no problem with those chips.
My Bold....

Safeware, it appears that the Mil Spec chip made by Texas Instruments is the faulty one, not the 'functionally identical' chip.... sadly it is often the case that 'Mil Spec' equates to the cheapest piece of junk the DoE/MOD contractor can get his hands on, splash with green paint, stamp a nsn on and pass on at a grossly inflated price. NOT that one would suggest that to be the case here....
Always a Sapper is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2007, 19:48
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: On the outside looking in
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sapper,

My reading of this was different to your:

Before 2003 there was a different supplier, and no problems with chips ( => Mil Spec chip?) After 03, a new supplier, and now problems. (non-Mil Spec chip?)

sw
Safeware is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2007, 20:18
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Closer than you think...
Age: 65
Posts: 390
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry Safeware, but...

The problem was detected in a routine ground start-up test of a new V-22 at the Bell assembly plant in Amarillo, Darcy said. The probability of a problem occurring in flight was low, Darcy said, "but if it occurred, the consequences could be very serious," so officials decided to ground the fleet.

The V-22 is a complex hybrid aircraft designed to carry troops and military cargo from bases or ships into combat zones. By rotating its wingtip-mounted turboprop engines, the aircraft can take off and land like a helicopter but fly at airplane speeds.

All the V-22s built to date use flight-control computer systems supplied by BAE Systems, Darcy said, and the chip in question is manufactured by Dallas-based Texas Instruments.

After analyzing the computer malfunction in Amarillo, engineers found that the chip reacted poorly in cold temperatures -- mostly subzero temperatures, but in one instance 30 degrees Fahrenheit.

Design specifications call for the computers to work at 65 degrees below zero, Darcy said.

No knows at this point how many of the 150-plus computers installed on the operational V-22s contain the defective chip. Before 2003, Darcy said, BAE had used a "functionally identical" chip made by another manufacturer. Tests showed that there was no problem with those chips.

Deducing from the article indicating that it was a new frame and Darcy stating BAE had used a 'functionally identical' chip before 2003 I was led to believe they were refering to the Texas Instrument chip. But to be honest either of the chips could be to 'Mil Spec' the article does not indicate either way although it does imply.

Either way I hope they get it sorted before they deploy the aircraft, I would not like to think that fine people who's lives are already on the line are put at more risk due to a bad batch of chips.
Always a Sapper is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2007, 21:13
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Reminds me of an episode 5 or so years ago - NASA had run out of early 8088 chips (IIRC) for legacy equipment -- and went looking on eBay.
barit1 is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2007, 21:52
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: England
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought this thread was going to be about some protected species choking on a piece of soggy fried potato! Quite spoiled my evening.

Regards

Ginseng
Ginseng is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2007, 22:18
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Where Alberts are Fixed
Age: 62
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Osprey done in by chip

Posted today by Barit 1
This chip in the flight control computer has V-22's temporarily grounded. Seems that a "minor change" 4 years ago wasn't so minor.

So how does that apply to the pair of said beasts that I saw flying today off of Tybee Island nr Savannah GA at about 2.50pm EST?

Mac
Mactlsm1 is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2007, 22:38
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the grounding occurred early this month (the newspaper story is Feb. 10), and the aircraft are being cleared one by one.

Besides, if it's a temperature problem, couldn't one simply avoid the problem temperature regime? (I don't submit that's the case, just suggesting it's a logical interim strategy)
barit1 is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2007, 10:21
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Here
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Reminds me of an episode 5 or so years ago - NASA had run out of early 8088 chips (IIRC) for legacy equipment -- and went looking on eBay.


IIRC the problem wasn't getting some spares on fleabay, or similar. The prob was that, modern chips being so complex and almost impossible to work out every combination of logic that could happen, they could not be cleared for manned space flight or really expensive deep space shots planned donkeys years before. The 8088 was the only chip that had been cleared for use by being fully logic trapped for every possible combination of circumstances. That being the case, it was vital to get hold of said ancient, out of production chips, that had been kept in a totally controlled process that was logged from manufacture to NASA use. A difficult thing to do, rather than get hold of some back-street junker that might look good but suffer a glitch at a really bad moment!
If you were a suitable organisation that had such stock controlled chips, I remember reading that a fabulous price was on offer!
Ray Darbouy is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.