Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Norway to buy C-130J??? ....and ASAP!????

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Norway to buy C-130J??? ....and ASAP!????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Jan 2007, 15:11
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Balmullo,Scotland
Posts: 933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by microlight AV8R
I understood that the first A400M was actually being assembled in Germany as we type?
Would think not as the final assembly line (FAL) is in seville. The fuselage will be constructed in Bremen and then transported by guppy to the FAL.
matkat is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2007, 16:56
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agreed, Major fuselage sections building now in germany. Also understand the wings have been completed here in Blighty. It is taking shape and certainly beyond being a concept. If it wasn't for the pressure of these two idiotic wars I'm sure you chaps would be looking forward to the A400M coming into service.

In the meantime, why not buy a few more Tristars from the desert supermarket as a long haul stop gap. I bet there are a few configured as freighters sitting there. Could that relieve some C130J from flying routes and allow them to do what they were built for? Speaking as somebody who had the fun of flying east of Suez in a whistling wheelbarrow I can see the folly of the 1974 cuts.

I take my hat off to all involved in trying to keep things moving.
microlight AV8R is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2007, 12:11
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: YORKS
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
All very childish indeed! However I seem to remember the Chinook out lifting the 'k' in Afganistan quite significantly....

Infact, the 'k' was only lifting 3 tonnes in the heat of the summer, hot and high......
3 bladed beast is offline  
Old 25th May 2007, 12:45
  #24 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 59°45'36N 10°27'59E
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The buy confirmed today. Norwegian minister of defense Anne-Grete Strøm-Erichsen gave the news at a press conference in Oslo today 25/5.

The deal is going to be for 4 C-130J-30s, the first to reach operational capability in 2009.

I bet the crews at 335Sqn are happy today.

(And the soldiers will be pleased to avoid travel with several semi-dodgy east block charter aircraft.......)


It is going to be a big stink in the parliament over this, but when you allow "communists" into a coalition goverment, that's what you get!
M609 is offline  
Old 26th May 2007, 09:07
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: wilts
Posts: 1,667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Result for RNAF. Say hello to Lasse if you see him.

PS landed the C130K at 170,000lbs plus into Bagram strip many a time. Full to the brim with fuel for the Chinner mates to use from the bag tanks. It is still an awesome beast!
nigegilb is offline  
Old 26th May 2007, 10:08
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Swindonshire, UK
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Which may go some of the way to explaining why they're all shagged now!
fat albert is offline  
Old 26th May 2007, 10:51
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: wilts
Posts: 1,667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ooh err, you're not allowed to do that these days are you? Nothing to do with me, my landings were always very smoooth...........
nigegilb is offline  
Old 26th May 2007, 19:53
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Karup, Denmark
Age: 70
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good thing we have the Il-76's (and An-124's) on our side now - not to mention the An-12 and Mil 8/17.
normally right blank is offline  
Old 26th May 2007, 22:33
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: West Oxfordshire
Age: 57
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yep there were 3 on an airfield 2 mins away from me the other day.
oxoneil is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2007, 23:09
  #30 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 59°45'36N 10°27'59E
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 450 million euro (approx) buy was approved in the Norwegian parliament today.

But: The Norwegian MOD allso informed the public that Airbus has run a smear campaign against LM, giving false information about the abilities of the C130J.

Airbus published a memo to the media, and perhaps more importantly to the members of the parliament defense committee, claiming that the C130J came last in all 7 comparison studies performed by the N-MOD. (The studies are classified)

The claim is completely wrong according to the same N-MOD

(Airbus also claimed 2 weeks ago,that the first A400 could be fully operational with the RNoAF in January 2010)

The media has made the misinformation case the major storyline, bringing in a lot of commentators on spin, corruption, lobbying etc.

Still, in the end, good result for the 335Sqn, the governments till is shut tight nowadays. Congrats!
M609 is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2007, 20:29
  #31 (permalink)  

Rebel PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (formerly EICK)
Age: 51
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airbus Military seem to be going crying to the media a lot on A400M and CN-295. No disrespect Beags, but A400M isn't flying yet and I suspect a couple of replacements have been pushed back to try and have competition i.e. the RAF C-17 lease but time's run out and the airforces need kit.

They were right about US KC-767 and Druyun, I'll give them that.
MarkD is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2007, 01:17
  #32 (permalink)  
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,874
Received 60 Likes on 18 Posts
The media has made the misinformation case the major storyline, bringing in a lot of commentators on spin, corruption, lobbying etc.
...poor darlings, it's called Marketing in the grown-up's world, and it's only bad form to tell outright porkies and get caught. He who sells wins.
Two's in is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2007, 05:35
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,817
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
There is a delay in the A400M programme, widely reported, due to the need to strengthen some internal TP400-D6 engine components as a result of ground testing experience.

Hence the engine will not now fly until Q4 2007.

However, first A400M flight and first delivery are still scheduled for 2009.

With the number of A400M orders already secured for other customers, it would perhaps have been doubtful whether the RNoAF could receive A400Ms in 2009, so they have had to settle for the less capable C130J.

Which will still be a good freight aircraft for the RNoAF, of course - just not as good as the A400M will be, had they been able to wait.
BEagle is online now  
Old 23rd Jun 2007, 18:40
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oxon
Age: 66
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Beags,

The good folk of Pruneland have accused you of many things over the years but naivety is new one on me,

"However, first A400M flight and first delivery are still scheduled for 2009."

Even someone as daft as me knows there is a world of difference between scheduled and actuality

I know you work for them and have a vested interest but please credit the rest of us with some intelligence
Seldomfitforpurpose is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2007, 19:17
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,817
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
Well, consult your crystal bollocks then and tell me when the first flight of the A400M will take place!

There is a scheduled date; whether or not that will be ultimately achieved obviously cannot be stated with certainty at this stage, o intelligent one.

And I do NOT work on the A400M programme!
BEagle is online now  
Old 23rd Jun 2007, 22:34
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oxon
Age: 66
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Two posts back you make "qualified" statements ................now you say you don't know anything and I should consult my "crystal bits", a bit of consistency would be good here old chap

Last edited by Seldomfitforpurpose; 23rd Jun 2007 at 22:55.
Seldomfitforpurpose is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2007, 05:32
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,817
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
My comments came from open sources.

Hardly rocket science for those who are sufficiently interested to keep up with the programme, I would have thought.
BEagle is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.