Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

OOA's dont count!!!

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

OOA's dont count!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Dec 2006, 23:52
  #21 (permalink)  
PTT
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Klingon
As an ex-desk officer responsible for pre-boarding I can say that OOA certainly does lend weight but only if the home assessments are consistently supportive. Board officers aren't the idiots you might think, they smell a rat when a guy can't be bothered to get out of his pit at home but is an OOA hero when away.
Prom boards know about the "Halo" effect and will set aside those OOA reports that appear embellished (same goes for loan service reports) and the cut and paste variety (Theatre Cdrs are busy chaps after all).
On the other side of the coin, no OOA and you need a good excuse. In my experience the only guys who I ever heard complaining about the inequity of the system where those who weren't doing so well out of it and hoped that a few theatre medals might boost their chances of a leg up. Sorry guys but there is just too much genuine competion!
So what are those of us who spend up to 6 months a year away supposed to do? We certainly won't get "consistently supportive home assessments" since there simply isn't time to get anything constructive done at home, and I'd suggest that anyone who claim's otherwise is actually reliant on an excellent 2ic of whatever secondary duty it is that they claim to be doing.

As for genuine competition, surely this is a military service whose primary purpose is to fight wars? I'd have hoped that experience of those things would lend more wieght to promotion prospects than merely being a decider between two otherwise "consistently supportive home assessments."
PTT is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2006, 23:59
  #22 (permalink)  
Cunning Artificer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The spiritual home of DeHavilland
Age: 76
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fish

Prom boards know about the "Halo" effect
May I respectfully suggest that the current ratio of Group Captains and above to Flight Lieutenants indicates that the halo effect is not in fact ignored and the current promo process is probably too lax?

Sorry, just an old civiilian plonker being provocative again...
Blacksheep is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2006, 07:48
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In the Ether
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Of course the trouble with a "natural break point" is that it does exactly what it says on the tin. It is designed to weed out those who don't want to commit. Thats what its for....to get rid of the top level of mid seniority guys so that there isn't a surplus all wanting promotion. If nobody went at the break point there would be chaos.
Vecvec, i couldn't agree more, under normal circumstances....but the steady-state after all of your non-commitals have left should still leave you with:

a. Enough experienced operators to do the job whilst maintaining some level of knowledge/experience.

b. Enough ladder-climbers(or enhanced pension seekers ) to fill the SO2 posts.

You need some degree of both. My point is that, at the moment, i'm not convinced that we have either!
Uncle Ginsters is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2006, 16:08
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 52
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PTT
So what are those of us who spend up to 6 months a year away supposed to do? We certainly won't get "consistently supportive home assessments" since there simply isn't time to get anything constructive done at home, and I'd suggest that anyone who claim's otherwise is actually reliant on an excellent 2ic of whatever secondary duty it is that they claim to be doing.
As for genuine competition, surely this is a military service whose primary purpose is to fight wars? I'd have hoped that experience of those things would lend more wieght to promotion prospects than merely being a decider between two otherwise "consistently supportive home assessments."
PTT....oh dear, oh dear.
I am probably on the most deployed Sqn in the RAF. I have spent 7 months on various OOAs this year and am scheduled for 8 months in 2007. However, like you, I still have 4/5 months back at base to take on a suitable high profile duty. Yes, I know we spend that time preparing for our next OOAs, CCS/IDT/IRT/Acclimatisation Trg etc etc, but this does not take up every hour of every working day.
You are totally correct in that we shouldn't have to do this to get promoted but the fact is, with more and more of us having the 'warfighting' tick, this isn't enough to be competative. You will have to face up to the fact that there are many of us that are deployed AND do more and more duties back at base, in order to compete for the few promotion places that are available. This includes early completion of CST.
Yes, this means we have no time for a 'life' but, like i've already flogged to death, there are tenough personnel out there that are willing to sacrifice this for a chance of promotion.
It's tough but the bottom line is; if you want promotion, you have to compete.
M7 sends
ps I have carefully selected my Secondary duty, in which there is a very good 2ic who gets the recognition she deserves!
Mightycrewseven is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2006, 22:04
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Just down the road from ISK
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Klingon
As an ex-desk officer responsible for pre-boarding I can say that OOA certainly does lend weight but only if the home assessments are consistently supportive.
Home assessments?? Where's home? Most of us spend more time abroad than in the UK!


Originally Posted by Klingon
Board officers aren't the idiots you might think, they smell a rat when a guy can't be bothered to get out of his pit at home but is an OOA hero when away.
God forbid that some personnel may have that warfighting character that comes good when it matters if there are paperclips to be be counted at home. But then, when the proverbial hits the fan, I'd much rather have in charge some bluntie who can run a ladies tea party than a solid chap who knows what fighting is about,
Vage Rot is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2006, 09:27
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: California
Age: 53
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Outsiders view here but I would think you would take all those who have deployed and screen that list for those you view as capable of being promoted. Some will just not be cut out for promotion some will need more time to be ready. But you take as many of those that have deployed that are ready first.

After that you screen those that havent deployed and take the best of those to fill out rest that you need.

People that have deployed have earned that right to be considerd first what is point of military asking society to show respect towards vetrans if military itself doesnt.
siddar is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.