Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Tornado F3 "shoots down" Typhoon - according to Navy News

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Tornado F3 "shoots down" Typhoon - according to Navy News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Nov 2006, 23:10
  #1 (permalink)  
Suspicion breeds confidence
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gibraltar
Posts: 2,405
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Tornado F3 "shoots down" Typhoon - according to Navy News

According to Navy News.

Here
Navaleye is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2006, 05:55
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: In the dark
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Typical PJHQ sending the wrong aircraft on the wrong job. How is an F3 supposed to destroy a ship?
FormerFlake is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2006, 06:31
  #3 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Cdr Simon Ward, Nottingham’s CO, said working alongside the RAF had proved extremely useful for both sides.

“This exercise heralded the next generation of co-operation between the RAF and RN,” he added.
“It’s a key function for both Services to be able to co-operate.”

Do you know, I think he's onto something.
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2006, 07:21
  #4 (permalink)  
London Mil
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I blame the "third (or is it second?) man in the cockpit". Always a little too cosy.
 
Old 18th Nov 2006, 07:22
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: EGCC
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FormerFlake
Typical PJHQ sending the wrong aircraft on the wrong job. How is an F3 supposed to destroy a ship?
I think the intention was that the F3's would take out the air cover. In which case, it was the right aircraft for the job.
We all know that the press don't have an understanding of what they are writing about.
grumpyoldb is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2006, 07:30
  #6 (permalink)  
O2thief
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Ex Wycombe Warrior

Originally Posted by FormerFlake
Typical PJHQ sending the wrong aircraft on the wrong job. How is an F3 supposed to destroy a ship?
Ex WW run by the NATO Combined Air Operations Centre (CAOC 9), based at RAF High Wycombe.
 
Old 18th Nov 2006, 08:18
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Excuse my ignorance of matters nautical but for how long have the CO's of ships been Commanders and not Captains? Is this just another example of cost cutting? It all seems a bit back to front to me - in the RAF squadron bosses were always Wing Commanders and not Squadron Leaders!
jonesthepilot is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2006, 08:55
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: London
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jonesthepilot
Excuse my ignorance of matters nautical but for how long have the CO's of ships been Commanders and not Captains? Is this just another example of cost cutting? It all seems a bit back to front to me - in the RAF squadron bosses were always Wing Commanders and not Squadron Leaders!
A person of any rank can be the captain of a ship, theoretically, ie the Captain of a minesweeper is likely to be a Lt Cdr or even a Lt.
May Day is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2006, 09:41
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: London
Age: 44
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
"Excuse my ignorance of matters nautical but for how long have the CO's of ships been Commanders and not Captains? Is this just another example of cost cutting? It all seems a bit back to front to me - in the RAF squadron bosses were always Wing Commanders and not Squadron Leaders"

Most minesweepers and patrol ships have Lt Cdrs driving them, Frigates / Destroyers will be a 3 ringer, while some have Captains (depends on the role though). All capital ships will have a 4 ring Captain driving them.
Jimlad1 is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2006, 09:55
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for that chaps. Further question then, if a Lt Cdr is OC the ship is he referred to as the 'ships captain'? Do his crew refer to him as the captain or the boss or what?
jonesthepilot is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2006, 10:04
  #11 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,438
Received 1,598 Likes on 733 Posts
IIRC, the commander of a ship is always addressed as Captain, regardless of rank. If there is another officer of the rank of Captain on board, he is addressed as Commodore, so that there can be no confusion....
ORAC is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2006, 11:26
  #12 (permalink)  
brickhistory
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by ORAC
IIRC, the commander of a ship is always addressed as Captain, regardless of rank. If there is another officer of the rank of Captain on board, he is addressed as Commodore, so that there can be no confusion....

But what if Lionel Ritchie and his ex-band mates got back together and did a benefit concert aboard a ship where there was a captain and a commodore......?



Ah, there's the door, I've been looking for that.......
 
Old 18th Nov 2006, 11:39
  #13 (permalink)  
Suspicion breeds confidence
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gibraltar
Posts: 2,405
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
It is unusual to have two Captains on a one ship, unless the Senior Captain has been given a specific group responsibility in which case he would adopt the title Commodore. Commodore is not a rank, just a title, although he has flag status in all but name. The officer maintains his place on the Captains list and reverts back to Captain on completion of the assigned duties
Navaleye is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2006, 13:10
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Devon
Posts: 2,811
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
Changed now Navaleye - Commodore is a rank.
WE Branch Fanatic is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2006, 13:14
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A Lt Cdr will never be "OC" of anything
Tourist is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2006, 15:11
  #16 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
As WEBF says, Commodore now a substantive rank, equiv with Brigadier and Air Commode. It was the case that it was a 1* title that was taken with a specific appointment, and the holder then reverted to Captain on relinquishing the role, as my old man did when he was DCOS at Northwood.
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2006, 12:03
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: La Ciotat
Age: 83
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Service ranks

Naval ranks are quite easy to understand.
The senior officer of the ship's company is always the commander. The commander of a ship is always known as the Captain, unless, of course, he is the Commander. He may, however, not be a captain but possibly a commander, if not a lieutenant commander. The second-in-command of a ship is the Commander, unless it's a small ship in which case he is the First Lieutenant, although he might possibly be a lieutenant-commander. On a big ship, the First Lieutenant is not usually the first lieutenant, but a junior lieutenant-commander or perhaps a lieutenant.
The Army is easier. The colonel of the regiment is usually a lieutenant-colonel, unless he is the Colonel of the Regiment, in which case he may be of any rank, or even, theoretically, a civilian.
The RAF is simple as long as you remember that Pilot Officers are not necessarily pilots, Flight Lieutenants don't usually command flights, squadrons are not led by Squadron Leaders, Wing Commanders have little to do with wings and groups aren't commanded by Group Captains. God knows what Air Commodores do.
I hope this makes everything clear.
Schiller is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2006, 12:10
  #18 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The Army does also get things back to front from time to time; evidenced by the fact that a Lieutenant General out-ranks a Major General
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2006, 12:20
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Saaaaaarf
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by airborne_artist
The Army does also get things back to front from time to time; evidenced by the fact that a Lieutenant General out-ranks a Major General
Or Sgt Major General as they once were known. Hence the disparity
sirsaltyhelmet is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2006, 12:41
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: On the outside looking in
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Schiller
Flight Lieutenants don't usually command flights, squadrons are not led by Squadron Leaders, Wing Commanders have little to do with wings
...if they are aircrew. Otherwise, they do generally.

But quite amusing anyway.

sw
Safeware is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.