Where are our 'Allies'
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Midlands
Age: 55
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Where are our 'Allies'
So, our gallant NATO allies have refused to supply any troops or support for Afghanistan.
If it wasn't so sickening, it would be laughable! What's the point of the organisation now?
If it wasn't so sickening, it would be laughable! What's the point of the organisation now?
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: South Wales
Age: 63
Posts: 729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=mlc;2879830]So, our gallant NATO allies have refused to supply any troops or support for Afghanistan.
Maybe our NATO allies are unsure of who the enemy is these days. After all, only a few years ago Russia was our enemy and Afganistan was one of our allies. Maybe our NATO allies cant embrace the "rate of change" the way we do!!!!
Maybe our NATO allies are unsure of who the enemy is these days. After all, only a few years ago Russia was our enemy and Afganistan was one of our allies. Maybe our NATO allies cant embrace the "rate of change" the way we do!!!!
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: South Wales
Age: 63
Posts: 729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the poppy trade is worse now
..You know him....
Agent Orange.
If that doesn't stop the poppy trade, nothing will.
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
It is UN approved, it is NATO approved, it is nationally approved.
If the only thing they want NATO for is against the possibility against an attack on their own nation, and an offer of help against the same against ours, and the light of the present threat..... isn't a total waste of money and, as the Russians say, a provocative remnant of the cold war?....
If the only thing they want NATO for is against the possibility against an attack on their own nation, and an offer of help against the same against ours, and the light of the present threat..... isn't a total waste of money and, as the Russians say, a provocative remnant of the cold war?....
Last edited by ORAC; 29th Sep 2006 at 21:16.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Some-r-set
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But to point an obvious (perhaps STUPID) point, *whispers* Afghanistan isn't near the North Atlantic.
Is it to do (as described below) because of the AQ attack on 11/9/2001?
*Digs trench**Dons tin hat**Ducks*
Is it to do (as described below) because of the AQ attack on 11/9/2001?
*Digs trench**Dons tin hat**Ducks*
Last edited by High_lander; 29th Sep 2006 at 21:21.
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 932
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry to be pedantic...
Don't remember Afghanistan actually invading a member country of NATO
The Taliban regime was hosting, and refused to surrender, al Qaeda before and after 9/11. The North Atlantic Council (NAC) enacted support to the US on 12 September 01 under Article 5 (an attack on one is an attack on all) for the first time in NATO's history.
There was an armed attack. We are still attempting to deal with the consequenes in Afghanistan, and for the first time since 2001, we're actually trying to do so across the whole country, and with sufficient development and hearts and minds projects to win for the long term. (Should've done this in 02 rather than creating new AQ training camp in Iraq IMHO, but there you are.
)Best to all out there and soon to go... it's a invaluable job under ****ty circumstances. God speed and good luck.
S41
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Quite right.. Best of luck to all involved. Unfortunately it doesn't quite matter what the NAC say - people are not convinced and they are not sending troops to the party (Shouldn't we have invaded Saudi Arabia anyway?)
If we kill all the Taliban - is it ethnic cleansing? As for the poppy crop why don't we just buy it?
If we kill all the Taliban - is it ethnic cleansing?
As for the poppy crop why don't we just buy it?
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
Ground - Check, Situation - Check, Mission - Che...hang on, what was the military mission again. Drop that down on an orders card, and NATO will be right on it I'm sure.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Quite right.. Best of luck to all involved. Unfortunately it doesn't quite matter what the NAC say - people are not convinced and they are not sending troops to the party (Shouldn't we have invaded Saudi Arabia anyway?)
If we kill all the Taliban - is it ethnic cleansing? As for the poppy crop why don't we just buy it?
If we kill all the Taliban - is it ethnic cleansing?
As for the poppy crop why don't we just buy it?Why dont we just make the poppies, them and their kids just glow in the dark? We have got the technology, and they sure as hell wouldnt hold back if they had it. I get the general feeling governments these days lack the balls and nouse to get the job done.
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Squirrel - Al Qaeda is generic - it can be transfered to any group of like minded people around the world. To think you can freeze Afghanistan at a period of relative safety and hope it will stay that way is a dream. Do we stay in Afghanistan for twenty,thirty years in the hope the Taliban don't regroup? As for buying the poppy crop - we did try that but the people running the programme ran out of money and some of the farmers ended up with nothing for their crop so they now do their own thing!
As for the attack on the U.S being an attack on a member state of NATO - indeed it was . However was NATO ever bought into play to help in the fight against terrorism in Europe during the 1960's and 70's? The fact that the attack caused destruction on a massive scale was unfortunately a clear sign of the increasing sophistication of the terrorist in the late 1990's and possibly driven by America's policies in the Middle East.
As for the attack on the U.S being an attack on a member state of NATO - indeed it was . However was NATO ever bought into play to help in the fight against terrorism in Europe during the 1960's and 70's? The fact that the attack caused destruction on a massive scale was unfortunately a clear sign of the increasing sophistication of the terrorist in the late 1990's and possibly driven by America's policies in the Middle East.
A couple of hundred years ago some Brit governor or such of India advised Her / His Majesty's govt that Afghanistan formed a natural buffer zone twixt Russia and The Empire and that nothing good would come of interferring inside that country.
Whenever foreigners try to sort that place out they come away with bloody noses.
And here we are again.
We should stop thinking that 'democracy' is the panacea for the worlds ills - if they don't want to get better leave 'em to it. If enough of them want to get better they will.
Whenever foreigners try to sort that place out they come away with bloody noses.
And here we are again.
We should stop thinking that 'democracy' is the panacea for the worlds ills - if they don't want to get better leave 'em to it. If enough of them want to get better they will.
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: ecosse
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why not give this poppy crop to the British Legion to sell on to the public to celebrate Nov11, in memory of that butcher Haig, who wasted so many men in his efforts to move his drinks cabinet forward another few yards?
Are we there again?
Are we there again?
Simple solution, perhaps too simple for the Global warriors. After all, where would the arms industry benefit 
http://www.globalideasbank.org/site/...hp?ideaId=5887
Key points being :-
- The farmers in Afghanistan would get a fair price for their crop.
- It would stop farmers joining the Taliban.
- It would reduce the price of morphine.
- It would address the morphine shortage.
- It would help stabilize Afghanistan.
- There would be a dramatic drop in Heroin reaching europe.
http://www.globalideasbank.org/site/...hp?ideaId=5887
Key points being :-
- The farmers in Afghanistan would get a fair price for their crop.
- It would stop farmers joining the Taliban.
- It would reduce the price of morphine.
- It would address the morphine shortage.
- It would help stabilize Afghanistan.
- There would be a dramatic drop in Heroin reaching europe.
Last edited by El Grifo; 30th Sep 2006 at 16:52. Reason: dodgy URL
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article...381896,00.html
Says it all really.. Don't suppose our glorious EU leaders are behind any of this? How dearly they would love to see the demise of NATO and the end of those meddlesome Americans
Says it all really.. Don't suppose our glorious EU leaders are behind any of this? How dearly they would love to see the demise of NATO and the end of those meddlesome Americans
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: May 2006
Location: London
Age: 69
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Because the other NATO countries understand the disaster that is "mission creep".
The idea in Afghanistan was that the US would support the government and fight the Taliban (thus getting themselves into a mess in trying to deal with the "warlords".
NATO forces would NOT priarily fight the Taliban, but would be peace keepers and try to control the poppy growing and bring reconstruction into effect.
Now, spot where the problem is !
NATO countries (other than Canada and UK) are quite rightly saying they do not want to step into the morass of doing the US's job - they are happy to do the peace keeping and reconstruction, but not the anti-taliban stuff.
If the Taliban won't co-operate and only attack the US then you have a typical international mess. The other NATO countries can see what will happen if they don't hold out for what they agreed, why doesn't this get commented on by Blair and co ?
Now if this was a normal situation, the UK's politicians and armed forces would be shouting "mission creep", but heaven help them if they had so much sense when so much spin is involved.
That is why that rather strange statement was made so many months ago about being happy if no shots were to be fired, because the original mission wasn't what is now occuring.
The idea in Afghanistan was that the US would support the government and fight the Taliban (thus getting themselves into a mess in trying to deal with the "warlords".
NATO forces would NOT priarily fight the Taliban, but would be peace keepers and try to control the poppy growing and bring reconstruction into effect.
Now, spot where the problem is !
NATO countries (other than Canada and UK) are quite rightly saying they do not want to step into the morass of doing the US's job - they are happy to do the peace keeping and reconstruction, but not the anti-taliban stuff.
If the Taliban won't co-operate and only attack the US then you have a typical international mess. The other NATO countries can see what will happen if they don't hold out for what they agreed, why doesn't this get commented on by Blair and co ?
Now if this was a normal situation, the UK's politicians and armed forces would be shouting "mission creep", but heaven help them if they had so much sense when so much spin is involved.
That is why that rather strange statement was made so many months ago about being happy if no shots were to be fired, because the original mission wasn't what is now occuring.