Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Extra FJ for Afghanistan

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Extra FJ for Afghanistan

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Sep 2006, 16:46
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: ball gazing
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Extra FJ for Afghanistan

See here:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/5357260.stm

Is one more enough?
mystic_meg is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2006, 16:51
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 517 Likes on 215 Posts
How many Harriers in the inventory that are combat capable?

Can the RAF not spare more than seven aircraft?

The guys are in a shooting war out there and in my view there is never "too much CAS"....what prevents sending Squadrons (plural) to the area and ensure the guys on the ground get the help they need?

I am not sniping here....but really concerned about the level of support the ground guys seem to be getting.....or not getting.
SASless is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2006, 17:12
  #3 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
1 and 4 Squadrons are established each with 12 airframes (and a T10 each).

You'd have thought it was possible to send slightly more than 29.2% of the capability.

Don't they know there's a war on?
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2006, 17:14
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How about having a chat with some Harrier guys and seeing how much more Afghanistan action they would be able to do!!! They are already doing loads, as well as the boat and other commitments. It's not just a case of sending more jets, the support is stretched as well as the Sqns themselves. What we need is a larger Air Force, more money and then we can properly protect the boys on the ground. Oh yeah ....... to that!!
skyhigh is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2006, 17:18
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Scotland
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Of course Just send all of them......

And when exactly are the crews going to have any R&R. Or see their Families this year....
enginesuck is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2006, 17:22
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 517 Likes on 215 Posts
Maybe the truth is coming out....a 30% deployment of the total strength is significant although the number of aircraft deployed is woefully small.

A similar deployment of USAF/USN/USMC aircraft would result in a few more than seven aircraft.

At what point does "downsizing" create a situation whereby adequate combat power cannot be deployed?
SASless is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2006, 17:27
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 64
Posts: 2,278
Received 36 Likes on 14 Posts
Sending more....It wasn't long since the labour treasury, er I mean government was going to bring all the harriers home.

Must be a war on or something.
ZH875 is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2006, 17:47
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: uk
Age: 37
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I heard some where that 800 sqaudron were going to go out there later this year this true??
lukeylad is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2006, 18:15
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 250 ft agl
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
800 NAS go out very soon- most have been out before as part of the Op, albeit as part of other Sqns...

Such a shame that the swimming pool that was put up by the DetCo last year(then condemned and torn down!) is gone. Such a waste of money when fans in each room would have been a far better way to boost morale... £700 later he realised that no-one else wanted the pool except the mosquitoes!!! A bronze bust of his head outside the DAG would have been a simpler legacy (he was a Nav afterall).

SMT
stickmonkeytamer is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2006, 18:27
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Top floor, b@stards moved me. NO LONGER watchin the circuit
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I have a feeling we are to see plenty more threads like this as our Forces are systematically "downsized" by our current political masters. Leaning and civilianisation have also taken its toll. Seven Harriers to support how many ground troops?? I also have a feeling we will have to loose a campaign (or at least get badly mauled) before Joe Public and the Blairites wake up and see what's actually going on. I just despair for the families.
HH2
Hammer Head Too is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2006, 18:33
  #11 (permalink)  

Champagne anyone...?
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: EGDL
Age: 54
Posts: 1,420
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seems a little poor to only be able to field 7 jets in what is, effectively, a war. I know the chaps on the ground would like to have more "CAS" on tap, as it were, but it seems that we can't provide it.
Not knocking the great job being done by the sqn folk out there now, just commenting on the lugubrious state of the modern RAF....

Never mind, with any luck a top neddy will come along shortly and tell us that there is a light at the end of the tunnel as Typhoon will be operational in a few years time
StopStart is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2006, 18:47
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Middle Drawer
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As any engineer will tell you.

The real reason for sending the seventh aircraft out is purely to provide spares for the other six.

Haven't you heard of Christmas Trees before?






TW
Talk Wrench is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2006, 19:14
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: essex
Age: 76
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like they'll have to send the BBMF soon
mikip is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2006, 19:16
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...and 2 new UCAVs won't entirely cut it untill they are armed.
L J R is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2006, 19:22
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When's the Typhoon going to be able to drop bombs/rockets/strafe?

Because if it doesn't, soon, a lot of very nasty questions are going to be asked at a very nasty high level...
FJJP is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2006, 19:33
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thing is if we had loads of jets out there the guys on the ground wouldn't appreciate them!
RileyDove is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2006, 20:12
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: In the middle
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Riley,
I'm really surprised you think that, unless you're being sarcastic. Have a chat to the guys you're supporting and find out what their opinion of the CAS is. I've spoken to guys out there who have been overwhelmed at the sound of fast air when things are getting a bit nasty so either you're fishing for compliments or you don't really understand the effect that it has.
Right here right now is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2006, 20:24
  #18 (permalink)  

Champagne anyone...?
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: EGDL
Age: 54
Posts: 1,420
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think he was being serious...

Having spoken to many of the guys myself I know quite how grateful they are for close air. I also know they'd like more of it, closer at hand. Which is why I still find it a bit hopeless that out of the large fleet of noisy things we have in the RAF we can only cobble together 7 to go on ops.

Lucky there's not a war on eh?
StopStart is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2006, 20:33
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sadly we're in an age of very small numbers of assets. If you want to adhere to 'harmony' then 1/5th of your assets is your ceiling. Now we're only acknowledging a commitment up to April 2007 so why can't we throw more at the problem?

I think the answer is that we're actually going to be there far longer....so actually we're overstretching with what we've got.

I am sure i am not alone in shedding a tear at the fact that seven deployed jets is 'overstretching'.

I know i am not alone in wishing the boys and girls our very best. Come home safely.
orca is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2006, 20:40
  #20 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Couple of sqns of Jaguar?

Oh, forgot, we don't have a couple.
Pontius Navigator is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.