Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Porn star wages...Not!

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Porn star wages...Not!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Sep 2006, 18:44
  #21 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Added to which you make make the stats tell you anything. US pay may be less , but that's the case across the US, as the cost of living is so much lower, so coupled with low personal taxation GI Joe and Jane have far more spending power than their equivs. in the UK forces.
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2006, 18:53
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Land of the Angles
Posts: 359
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I don’t suppose that ‘the USA lot’ have to pay $380,000.00 for an average house, $8 for a gallon of gas, $80 for a pair of Levi’s and still pay tax and rates whilst serving overseas.

Also find me a squaddie who after 22 years of service retired at 40 on a good wage, no I didn’t think so.
Hilife is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2006, 18:54
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AA not saying I agree with it but just hypothesising about the political arguments. Why compare with other armed forces personnel from around the world anyway?
WorkingHard is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2006, 19:30
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Loved the opening article i would like to see that in one of the national papers, if it's not already been printed.
The forces have always been underpaid but it's not really come to light untill the past few years when we've had to "do the job". In previous years we spent all our time lounging around Germany waiting for the soviet bear to launch and drinking ourselves stupid on cheap beer.
Now, after years of resources being eroded and units reduced in size we have been asked to take on a huge task with minimal equipment and personell. Unfortunately due to our own "can do attitude" when for too many years our commanders have been happy to state that "no don't worry we can do that" and the boys on the ground have used their own ingenuity to resolve the shortages, we now pay the price.
As for the medical side i wouldn't say they are that good, after leaving the forces the first civil dentist i saw was appalled at my teeth, which had been annualy inspected during my time, as was the case with a number of old pals who all told the same story.
The Docs aren't interested unless you've got extra holes or something exotic, the amount of people i know with joint injuries, knee, ankle, were not given the time of day, up to the point of having source an operation for myself with the NHS to fix my knee.
I'm glad i left when i did and my heart goes out to the guys left holding the fort, quite literally in Afghanestan, who are now faced with this huge responsibility while the politicians jockey for position at the polls thinking of nothing but their own self image.
Good luck to you all
Staticdroop is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2006, 19:33
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: South Wales
Age: 63
Posts: 729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by WorkingHard
AA not saying I agree with it but just hypothesising about the political arguments. Why compare with other armed forces personnel from around the world anyway?
What a daft statement. What planet are you on??
SRENNAPS is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2006, 19:40
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: South Wales
Age: 63
Posts: 729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by WorkingHard
How many other "jobs" get to retire at 38/16 year point with the kind of package you get? Some will not get the option because of the death in service but you can see where the politicians can argue the point. BTW the pay in the British Armed Services is higher than the USA lot I am told
Also a daft statement!!! We are not house flys that can be just swotted - "Some will not get the option because of the death" - Just who the hell are you??
SRENNAPS is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2006, 20:13
  #27 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Working Hard

I was responding to this:

I had this exact conversation with the Defence Secretary a few weeks ago and the excuse was "You get paid more than other armed forces worldwide".
Was the UK DefSec comparing apples with apples, or as is more likely, apples with pears?
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2006, 21:54
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Wiltshire
Age: 59
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How many other "jobs" get to retire at 38/16 year point with the kind of package you get?
Pay point Annual salary with effect from 1 April 2005
On commencing service £19,803
On completion of the initial training period £22,107
2 years £23,388 (a)
3 years £24,819
4 years £25,599
5 years £26,421
6 years £27,174
7 years £27,849
8 years £28,740
9 years £30,477
10 years £31,092 (b)
(a) All officers move to this salary point on completion of two years' service as a constable.
(b) Officers who have been on this point for a year will have access to the competence-related threshold payment of £1,032 a year.

Free uniform and overtime pay as well!!

Those pay figures are for west country police force.

So a High band Level 4 Sgt (£31,098) or a Low Band Level 6 Sgt (£30,174) / Level 3 CT / FS / SSgt (£30,974) will earn as much as the 10 year Policeman.

True you can't retire at the 18 / 38 year point / 22 years on a full pension but you can retire after 30 years service on a very nice full pension and a big lump sum.

No I am not a copper just using the figures as a comparision.

Last edited by November4; 15th Sep 2006 at 10:10.
November4 is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2006, 01:21
  #29 (permalink)  
Cunning Artificer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The spiritual home of DeHavilland
Age: 76
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My pension after 14 years under the colours is...?

Nada, zilch, zero. I got a cheque for 1200 quid and a bill for 57 quid for "barrack damages" to our married quarter.

I left because even back in 1977 we were being worked 55 hours a week with no overtime and every other weekend on duty. I know that compared to life in the sand pit we had a life of luxury, but on 32 Sqn we worked alongside civilian contractors who looked after 207's Devons and Pembrokes in the same working conditions. They earned nearly three times what we were paid.
I took that to be an option for change.

The government and the nation has always shown nothing but contempt for its military. Someone (Kipling?) wrote a poem about it - "Its Tommy this and Tommy that and..." that still holds good.
Blacksheep is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2006, 13:50
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The Roman Empire
Posts: 2,456
Received 74 Likes on 34 Posts
Quote: How many other "jobs" get to retire at 38/16 year point with the kind of package you get?

Try looking at an MPs pension package - the best in the country, there's a surprise. Working from memory only, I seem to recall they qualify for a pension after 6 years, i.e have to get elected twice, and earn 1/40th of their salary for every year served before retirement. So, in comparison to a serviceman, who used to get 28.5% after 16 years on the old pension scheme, and 22.8% (16/70ths) on the new, an MP will get 16/40ths, i.e 40%!! Not bad eh!!

MPs pension scheme doesn't get talked about much - I wonder why??
Biggus is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2006, 14:20
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I unreservedly apologise if any offence was caused, it was not intended. I do think everyone needs to consider that "the grass is NOT always greener".
I also wish the nation as a whole held our troops in much greater affection but alas it is not so.
WorkingHard is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.