Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

USAF Plans JSF cuts

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

USAF Plans JSF cuts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Sep 2006, 06:16
  #1 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,452
Received 1,617 Likes on 739 Posts
USAF Plans JSF cuts

And so it starts..........

Military.com: Air Force Plans JSF Cuts

The Air Force plans to reduce its expected purchase of Joint Strike Fighters by 72 aircraft in the service’s proposed six-year spending plan due to skyrocketing costs in the Lightning II program, defense officials tell Inside the Air Force................

Last edited by ORAC; 11th Sep 2006 at 06:37.
ORAC is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2006, 06:32
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Pianosa
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If it is due to the F-22 program (and not the need for bullets and bandages for the Iraqi occupation- which has also greatly affected other appropriations for the USAF and USN), it's because the USAF knows that the F-22 is the more vulnerable program for the chopping block- outrageous price tag, low production numbers, questionable cost-effectiveness and almost 15 years of being a political hot potato. My guess is that they felt the need to sure that up first since they know that it won't have too hard a time eventually getting funding for JSF through amendments to the various authorization and appropriations bills. In fact it'll be one of the rare occassions where the Navy will actually be pulling with them.

JSF is going to be the mainstay of the USAF/USN and USMC fast jet fleet- there is no credible alternative on the cards for them, it simply has to be funded. Therefore, I'd be reluctant to get too excited about this news.

(P.S. Please note that the RAF/RN requirements didn't even enter into this analysis and that's because the US couldn't give a monkeys.)
Washington_Irving is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.