We are not ill-equiped, we are not under-funded
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Gloucestershire
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ZH - would be interesting, but always worth remembering that one applies to PVR, it is not a right and can be refused. This is yet another example of why we are different to civilians and need to be treated differently and we need to be everso careful about aligning ourselves along best-practise civilian working practices (lack of perks!) as a result.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: In Hyperspace...
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As a former soldier, he should know better than to think the chiefs of staff would deploy their people into operations they saw as inadequately planned or funded in order to please the Treasury – or anyone else for that matter.
The operation is fully funded – and this includes extra costs which emerge, as they always do during military operations.
In any case, Mr Moriarty’s suggestions about the Defence budget itself are not right. He complains that it has only risen in line with inflation since 2001. Actually the annual defence budget has risen by five billion pounds over the last five years - well in excess of inflation.
Finally Mr Moriarty suggests morale in Afghanistan is suffering. Rather than me suggesting he’s wrong from here in Basra, I think a recent comment by Lt Col Stuart Tootal, commander of 3 Para in Helmand, where the fighting has been most intense, sums it up. 'I have never seen the morale of my men as high. This is exactly what they are trained to do'.
Mr Brown(e), you are rapidly becoming a poor parody of "Comical Ali" giving his "there eez no Americans 'ere in Baghdad" speech, as the plain truth rolls into view over the brow of the hill behind you. You should seriously consider a move to the Heritage or Sport departments where you can't do any real damage. Or better still, the "Chiltern Hundreds".