Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Joint Helicopter Command........

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Joint Helicopter Command........

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Aug 2006, 15:02
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hampshire
Age: 53
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
JHC

Before we go into a full blown peeing contest, I'd just like to say that I have been involved with JHC since it's inception. Some aspects work, some don't and sniping at our brothers dressed in green isn't going to change much.
I've worked with some shambolic people in my own service(RAF) and some first class individuals in the Army, and vice versa. Pigeon holing people on the colour of their beret only holds us back.
The AAC are doing a fantastic job in the Stan, as indeed is the SH Force and both deserve mutual respect for excelling at different jobs requiring different attributes. As a SH Mate, the British Army are our customer, and we forget that at our peril....ask 12 Sqn RAAF who kindly handed their SH to the Army after playing by the truckie fleet rules.
As for the RN, God I've tried to understand them, but they seem to exist to perpetuate their own PR and to maintain traditions developed when the earth was believed flat.
sixbarrelldiplomat is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2006, 15:13
  #22 (permalink)  
Hellbound
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Blighty
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TR

you are so right - just how many people does it take to look after a few Lynx? Roughly the same as it does to look after the Wokkas and AH combined. Good job we have lots of spare space out there for them all...
South Bound is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2006, 15:18
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sixbarrelldiplomat.

Stick it up your @rse.

Decided that emergency banter was all that was required to refute your post.
Tourist is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2006, 15:35
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Op Tastic
What an opener for debate... and THS and SB grace us with insight and comment normally reserved for the Oracle.
Current:
AH proves itself as a true Army platform and rightly sits on the gree side of the fence.
Future:
RAF SH fleet combined with AAC - working together - no noses put out of joint and Crabs able to get Blueys delivered on time and right location.
AT Fleet sub-contracted out to 'who-ever' but not run by the current bunch.
Typhoon Air Defence scrapped - who exactly is the enemy we are dog-fightin' against - put the money into more SH. Remaining a/c fit niceley into the new RN Marine Air Wing. Littoral ops and rum rations.
As we all know,and to quote the Oracle, "There will be a great victory!"
I'm off for breakfast...
This just shows you that you think Defence Procurement is all about military need and capability - and not about thousands of voters keeping our politicians in a job ......... By the way, Father Christmas isn't real!
GasFitter is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2006, 17:23
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: England
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The JHC has been around for what, 7, 8 years? And for the first time in all those years, the Commander is something other than RAF and all of a sudden the Crabs feel threatened.

Did you expect the RAF to command it forever? The FAA don't drip about it all day with truculant comments and yet haven't had a sniff at the command.
Arthur's Wizard is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2006, 08:13
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: door or ramp, don't mind.
Posts: 961
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Arthur's Wizard
The JHC has been around for what, 7, 8 years? And for the first time in all those years, the Commander is something other than RAF and all of a sudden the Crabs feel theatened.
No, not threatened, just a bit with all the barmy Army nonsense that now permeates every aspect of our working lives with the possible exception of the colour of the head dress we wear although I suspect that's not far off.
For example, there are Landrovers running round Kandahar bearing (RAF) Sqn insignia of a well known mythical horsey type creature, being driven by and permanently allocated to Army folk who "forgot" to bring any MT to the party, but because we're all "joint" we have to give up our assets to bail out the pongoes.
Now let me ask you this....Do you think this arrangement would be so popular if the tide were going out instead of coming in?
And they have the audacity to say WE don't know how to deploy.
Talking Radalt is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2006, 14:13
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: England
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
errrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr ok!

So your gripe about the Army dominating the JHC (They do have more helicopters than the other 2 services put together) stems from you having to give up a Land Rover due to poor Pongo admin?

Ask the Green Types who the second class citizen's in JHF (NI) are; I can assure you that it isn't our light blue bretheren.
Arthur's Wizard is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2006, 14:49
  #28 (permalink)  
Hellbound
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Blighty
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not 100% sure it is JHC's attitude to light blue that is the problem, after all the RAF have been fairly represented in the 2-Star department since its inception. Is it rather that the mainstream RAF (STC) has kind of forgotten about the SH world? I can't actually find much written down about where rotary fits into AirPower doctrine at all, although I do believe there may be a project in the offing to study it and understand it.

Personally (and I am RAF) I think all the rotary should be under one banner, RAF or AAC, whichever is best suited (not intending to start a fight on that one), but it just seems barking to have 2 (3 if you count CHF) groups of people working so closely together under different rules/regs/terms of service etc. JHC is a bit of a compromise in that respect providing essential oversight of the different processes.
South Bound is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2006, 17:45
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: door or ramp, don't mind.
Posts: 961
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Arthur's Wizard
errrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr ok!
So your gripe about the Army dominating the JHC (They do have more helicopters than the other 2 services put together) stems from you having to give up a Land Rover due to poor Pongo admin?
Errrrr, not exactly. The MT issue is an example of how the J in JHC apparently stands for "Army", not the sole reason.
Maybe the RAF should start operating tanks (not those piddly little things the Rocks had). Proper big Chally 2s. Then see who whinges.
Trouble is the Army in general firmly believe their own Be The Best campaign and think they can do absolutely everything and anything far, far better than absolutely anybody else, ever, in the known Universe.
Talking Radalt is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2006, 18:17
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TR,
It's not just JHC that has **** all "purple" in it.

I am sure you already have but try a visit to AIR STATION Basrah and see just how the Green Machine runs that place. Every "chinless lab owning tea from Fortnum and Mason daddy owns shropshire stupid stick carrying daft hat wearing" wonder drives the 2-300 yards to work in a brand new disco 3 but try getting fours jinglie buses for the Herc det

Happily the det is off to the "Deid" leaving behind all those quaint little customs like RSM's, this bars for permanent staff, CBA everywhere unless of course you are out jockstrapping, tent inspections by the Camp Com blah blah.........

all spelling mistakes are "df" alcohol induced
Always_broken_in_wilts is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2006, 20:21
  #31 (permalink)  
iss
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: england
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sod whether or not the 'RAF' has been stitched. The question has to be if the RAF guys in JHC are better supported by their Brown-job Bosses than when the previous Light Blue hierarchy
iss is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2006, 21:05
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: England
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Talking Radalt
Maybe the RAF should start operating tanks (not those piddly little things the Rocks had). Proper big Chally 2s. Then see who whinges.
.
A very interesting reply. So am I to understand from this that your argument is based on the fact that the Pongos (and presumably the FAA) should not even own aircraft let alone head up a Joint Command?

Mmmmm. Great argument
Arthur's Wizard is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2006, 01:44
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: door or ramp, don't mind.
Posts: 961
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Arthur's Wizard
A very interesting reply. So am I to understand from this that your argument is based on the fact that the Pongos (and presumably the FAA) should not even own aircraft let alone head up a Joint Command?
No, my argument is based on the premise that the Army consistently poke the RAF for being a bit light weight yet man-power heavy, disorganised, afraid of a bit of bad weather and generally battle-shy, yet if one scratches ever so gently beneath the surface exactly the same can be said of a large portion of outfits like the AAC (note: a large portion, not all)
Army (very loud) "We're great! You're shi!t!"
RAF <sigh> "yes, ok, you win"
Talking Radalt is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2006, 07:57
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To be fair.
They may, in fact, not always be great, but you are ****e.....
Tourist is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2006, 12:28
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Midlands
Posts: 745
Received 25 Likes on 8 Posts
Question

On the subject of JHC and cheapness, value for money,etc..why do we in the RAF still have commisioned officers flying SH when everyday I see SNCO AAC pilots doing the same job ? Okay, delivering blueys and cabbying the Brig about may be slightly diffrent to carrying a stick of paras but the 'driving' jobs just the same.
Stitchbitch is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2006, 13:39
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: troon
Age: 61
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Stitchbitch
On the subject of JHC and cheapness, value for money,etc..why do we in the RAF still have commisioned officers flying SH when everyday I see SNCO AAC pilots doing the same job ? Okay, delivering blueys and cabbying the Brig about may be slightly diffrent to carrying a stick of paras but the 'driving' jobs just the same.

Good point - And the Fleet Air Arm for that Matter.
althenick is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2006, 14:26
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Or C130's, VC10's, Tri Stars, E3D's, FJ Backseaters etc etc.

Stand by to be told how 'special' they all are and how the Army has it all wrong.





BellEndBob is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2006, 16:20
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Stitchbitch
On the subject of JHC and cheapness, value for money,etc..why do we in the RAF still have commisioned officers flying SH when everyday I see SNCO AAC pilots doing the same job ? Okay, delivering blueys and cabbying the Brig about may be slightly diffrent to carrying a stick of paras but the 'driving' jobs just the same.
Because if the MOD insisted that all aircrew in the Army had to be commissioned, the Army couldn't produce the quality of people to fill all of the cockpits .... or of course you'd have to get a bigger bunch of chinless wonders whose father's own some shire county, train them for a significant period, so that they could go back to their preferred regiments after one productive tour having had "jolly good fun flying "a toy" for a few years! Now that's a waste of money, training, time and effort - but hey, it's the only way that the AAC will get any understanding or representation in the higher places of the Army as they are not taken seriously. Infantry and tanks, that's what the Army do - AAC are the glorified General's taxi service! Leave the professional aircrew within the RAF to do the proper stuff whilst the green jobs enjoy themselves under the direction of the ignorant 'Teeth Arm' who continue to blah on about the uselessness of the 'Air Environment' because they can't see it on the battlefield, whilst simultaneously demonstrating they don't understand it at all!
GasFitter is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2006, 17:25
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: door or ramp, don't mind.
Posts: 961
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BellEndBob
Stand by to be told how 'special' they all are and how the Army has it all wrong.
You've got it all wrong.
Talking Radalt is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2006, 18:58
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gas Fitter

A lot of the NCO aircrew in the RAF that I have met would be well up to doing the flying job, but for you it seems to be a question of " if they don't fit into the officers mess then they cant fly the aircraft".

History shows that the greatest achivments of the RAF would not have happend without NCO pilots.
A and C is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.