Australia Investigates Alternative to F-35
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
Australia Investigates Alternative to F-35
TheAge.co.au: Govt wants alternative to F-35 fighter
The federal government has ordered a new proposal for a "well-developed alternative" to the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) amid concerns the $15 billion project can't be delivered as promised.
Fairfax newspapers report that Defence Minister Brendan Nelson said he wanted a back-up to the warplane. "We don't have to finally commit to the Joint Strike Force (Force) by 2008 but I want to make sure we have a well-developed alternative well in advance of that," he was quoted as saying.
Dr Nelson would not move the project to cabinet until alternatives were analysed and at least one selected, the papers said, although he would not identify any alternatives. He was impressed by the fighter's potential and believed, if delivered on time and for the promised price, it would be the "correct aircraft for us".
The JSF is in development but concerns have been expressed that its cost may rise too high and delivery time fall back years. The fighter was not only the most expensive Defence project ever, it was the biggest investment by the commonwealth since Federation, the papers said.
The federal government has ordered a new proposal for a "well-developed alternative" to the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) amid concerns the $15 billion project can't be delivered as promised.
Fairfax newspapers report that Defence Minister Brendan Nelson said he wanted a back-up to the warplane. "We don't have to finally commit to the Joint Strike Force (Force) by 2008 but I want to make sure we have a well-developed alternative well in advance of that," he was quoted as saying.
Dr Nelson would not move the project to cabinet until alternatives were analysed and at least one selected, the papers said, although he would not identify any alternatives. He was impressed by the fighter's potential and believed, if delivered on time and for the promised price, it would be the "correct aircraft for us".
The JSF is in development but concerns have been expressed that its cost may rise too high and delivery time fall back years. The fighter was not only the most expensive Defence project ever, it was the biggest investment by the commonwealth since Federation, the papers said.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looks like history is repeating itself yet again. The very same thing happened in the late 60's after the TSR2 was ditched in favour of the (then on paper only) F111. Two squadrons of F4E's were leased to cover the gap when the Triple-1 was delayed - and delayed, and delayed. (A little bit of trivia that might be of interest given what's currently dominating the headlines, I understand that those Oz F4's, on their return to their owner, had the kangaroo roundels replaced with a six pointed blue star before they were sent on a very hurried one way deployment to take part in the Yom Kippur War.)
I suspect that recent events might have helped convince a few of the suits in Canberra that what those boring men in uniform have been telling them all along might be true - the F35 simply will not and can never provide a believable replacement for the F111. I forget who it was who originally coined the ‘speak softly and carry a big stick’ phrase, but in an increasingly uncertain world, the F35 simply isn’t a big enough stick (or to be more accurate, doesn’t have nearly long enough legs or long range low level capability) to provide Australia with a credible deterrent force.
I suspect that recent events might have helped convince a few of the suits in Canberra that what those boring men in uniform have been telling them all along might be true - the F35 simply will not and can never provide a believable replacement for the F111. I forget who it was who originally coined the ‘speak softly and carry a big stick’ phrase, but in an increasingly uncertain world, the F35 simply isn’t a big enough stick (or to be more accurate, doesn’t have nearly long enough legs or long range low level capability) to provide Australia with a credible deterrent force.
Kiwi PPRuNer
Join Date: May 2000
Location: rockingham, western australia
Age: 42
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
100 or so new model f-15E's would probably cost a lot less, deliverys could start almost straight away, and the aircraft could still clean the clock of anything else in the area
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: YES
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Wiley
Looks like history is repeating itself yet again. The very same thing happened in the late 60's after the TSR2 was ditched in favour of the (then on paper only) F111. Two squadrons of F4E's were leased to cover the gap when the Triple-1 was delayed - and delayed, and delayed. (A little bit of trivia that might be of interest given what's currently dominating the headlines, I understand that those Oz F4's, on their return to their owner, had the kangaroo roundels replaced with a six pointed blue star before they were sent on a very hurried one way deployment to take part in the Yom Kippur War.)
I suspect that recent events might have helped convince a few of the suits in Canberra that what those boring men in uniform have been telling them all along might be true - the F35 simply will not and can never provide a believable replacement for the F111. I forget who it was who originally coined the ‘speak softly and carry a big stick’ phrase, but in an increasingly uncertain world, the F35 simply isn’t a big enough stick (or to be more accurate, doesn’t have nearly long enough legs or long range low level capability) to provide Australia with a credible deterrent force.
I suspect that recent events might have helped convince a few of the suits in Canberra that what those boring men in uniform have been telling them all along might be true - the F35 simply will not and can never provide a believable replacement for the F111. I forget who it was who originally coined the ‘speak softly and carry a big stick’ phrase, but in an increasingly uncertain world, the F35 simply isn’t a big enough stick (or to be more accurate, doesn’t have nearly long enough legs or long range low level capability) to provide Australia with a credible deterrent force.
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GOLF_BRAVO_ZULU
Now that is Smart Procurement. Doesn't demonstrate commitment, solidarity nor trust to the USA, though.
This is standard practice in the Aussie DMO. Any procurement submission must include both the desired system (in this case Dave) and a MOTS fallback (so expect to see Typhoid, Gripen with extended range or possibly F18E).
They're doing exactly the same with their shipping projects - they want to buy a spanish assault ship design tweaked to AUS requirements, but are mandated to include the French (in-service) equivalent.
They're doing exactly the same with their shipping projects - they want to buy a spanish assault ship design tweaked to AUS requirements, but are mandated to include the French (in-service) equivalent.
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bris Vegas Australia
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by NURSE
From what I remember reading some of the former Aussie F4's became F4G wild weasel aircraft so not all of them went to Israel.
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Pianosa
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GOLF_BRAVO_ZULU
Now that is Smart Procurement. Doesn't demonstrate commitment, solidarity nor trust to the USA, though.
Bagsy UK forces get headquartered in the Whitsundays!
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: by the Great Salt Lake, USA
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As Governor of New York Teddy Roosevelt fought with the party bosses, who threatened, to "ruin" him if he didn't cooperate with appointments. In the end the bosses gave in.
Nathan Miller in his book "Theodore Roosevelt, A Life", page 337, writes
"Looking back upon his handling of the incident, Roosevelt thought he 'never saw a bluff carried more resolutely through to the final limit.' And writing to a friend a few days later, he observed: 'I have always been fond of the West African proverb: "Speak softly and carry a big stick; you will go far." ' "
This proverb popularly attributed to Roosevelt served him well in his presidency.
So, which West African people originated that saying, I wonder?
Obviously, he learned it on one of his many safaris... showing that "travel broadens the mind" is also a true saying.
Nathan Miller in his book "Theodore Roosevelt, A Life", page 337, writes
"Looking back upon his handling of the incident, Roosevelt thought he 'never saw a bluff carried more resolutely through to the final limit.' And writing to a friend a few days later, he observed: 'I have always been fond of the West African proverb: "Speak softly and carry a big stick; you will go far." ' "
This proverb popularly attributed to Roosevelt served him well in his presidency.
So, which West African people originated that saying, I wonder?
Obviously, he learned it on one of his many safaris... showing that "travel broadens the mind" is also a true saying.
Originally Posted by Pass-A-Frozo
Did someone say Air Launched Brahman?
This, is more on the lines of what I had in mind, though....
