Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Does Cpl Clegg get exonerated now?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Does Cpl Clegg get exonerated now?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Jul 2006, 10:42
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: France 46
Age: 77
Posts: 1,743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does Cpl Clegg get exonerated now?

Given the news that NO individuals will face charges over the shooting of an innocent man at Stockwell Underground Station; is it not time that Cpl Clegg of the Parachute Regt is formally exonerated for carrying out his duty at a VCP in N Ireland?
cazatou is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2006, 11:05
  #2 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: LONDON
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surely Cpl Clegg,s conviction was quashed and he was prommoted to full Cpl. I think you would be bettter putting this on ARRSE.

More of an army thing this one........................
movadinkampa747 is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2006, 11:58
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Long ago and far away ......
Posts: 1,399
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Perhaps it is of interest to military aviators because of the wider implications: the flurry of law suits against military folk just trying to do their jobs in very trying circumstances?
MrBernoulli is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2006, 12:17
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to the news the Police are to be prosecuted under the Health & Safety Act.

How stupid. Everyone knows you should wash your hands both before AND after a shooting.
bradfordboy is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2006, 12:41
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Spain
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
So, you hold down an innocent man and pump 7 bullets into his head and NOBODY gets charged with manslaughter or murder. British justice at its very finest.
maxburner is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2006, 12:55
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An absolute shambles. The Police cocked it up from start to finish and the idiots with the guns lost control IMHO. SEVEN bullets? Not only should there be charges but some of those in so called charge should be sacked as well.
British Police Service, what a joke.
BellEndBob is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2006, 13:00
  #7 (permalink)  
Hellbound
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Blighty
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Easy sat here chatting about it, isn't it? Not quite so easy when your comms is rubbish and you are having to decide whether or not someone is going to blow up a train load of people is it?

As for 7 bullets, how many would you use if you had to make absolutely sure the bloke was dead and couldn't operate any devices?

My thoughts are with the family, but also with the plods that did the deed, it was not their decision, but it will live with them for ever...
South Bound is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2006, 13:04
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A suicide bomber with no bag/backpack, bulky clothes etc. The mistake was made and compounded way before the comms went.
7 bullets is a total loss of self control, period. Go to jail, do not pass go.

My thoughts are with the family as well. I hope they hound the police through every Civil court in the land.
BellEndBob is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2006, 13:06
  #9 (permalink)  
Hellbound
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Blighty
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Think I would be fairly hyped up if I was standing next to someone that I thought might blow me up any second. I'll give the shooter the benefit, but someone needs sacking higher up...
South Bound is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2006, 13:11
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Spain
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yes, the Police have an unenviable job to do, sometimes under enormous pressure. But, when a private soldier shoots a man at a check point in Iraq he has an army of human rights lawyers hounding him into court. The police have chosen to operate a shoot to kill policy, there was, it seems, reasonable doubt that the man was a terrorist, the comms equipment was bad, the training sounds inadequate, there was doubt amongst those there that he was a suspect and yet, they allowed him to enter a train deep underground where their comms were of no use and pumped 7 bullets into his head. He was innocent. Someone should be held to account. Whitewash.
maxburner is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2006, 13:13
  #11 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: LONDON
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Blimey it didnt take long for this thread to change direction..........What about poor old Cpl Clegg that the original thread starter asked about?
movadinkampa747 is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2006, 13:32
  #12 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Thumbs down

Originally Posted by BellEndBob
7 bullets is a total loss of self control, period. Go to jail, do not pass go.
.
You need to watch the US video where after being shot in the head four or five times by an undercover cop, a druggie who pulled the knife manages to get the pistol off the cop and kills him.

Gotta love the Monday morning coaches!
Keg is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2006, 13:34
  #13 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: France 46
Age: 77
Posts: 1,743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cpl Clegg opened fire when a stolen vehicle crashed through the VCP at high speed injuring some of the soldiers. If he wasn't supposed to open fire then what on earth was the purpose of that, or any other, VCP? As it turned out the occupants were young "joyriders". It was the same CPS that prosecuted him that has decided against prosecutions in this case.

Consistancy?
cazatou is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2006, 13:38
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Spain
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
So Keg, are you advocating a shoot to kill policy for anyone suspected of being a druggie? Or maybe anyone who looks vaguely Islamic?

That's not the England I signed up to protect and it's not the England that I want to live in.
maxburner is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2006, 13:45
  #15 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Thumbs down

Geez Max, talk about taking comments out of context. One contributor says that seven bullets is excessive in order to render someone no longer a danger. I'm saying that seven bullets may be absolutely necessary.

I am NOT commenting on the decision making process that goes through a cops mind when deciding whether or not to use deadly force. I am NOT commenting on any other decisions that were made that day. I AM commenting on the fact that once that decision has been made to stop someone (using that deadly force) then nothing is 'excessive'. You keep going until the threat is stopped- or at least that was what I was taught many years ago during my weapons training. The ONLY point I was making is that people can come back from a couple of shots to the head.

Anything else you'd like to take out of context?
Keg is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2006, 13:52
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Spain
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Fair enough Keg, I mistook the point you were making.

MB
maxburner is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2006, 14:24
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
CPS - "Why did you fire 7 rounds into the suspect?"

Copper - "Because my pistol jammed".



It does seem strange when troops who served in Iraq have their identities splashed across the press and are hounded by the CPS over an alleged murder that had no body, no witnesses and no motive whereas a few coppers who definately need to read up the white card ROE's 'get away' with the cold-blooded murder of an innocent by-stander in a London tube station.

No I wasn't there at the tube station but I've been on top cover in Iraq a in a couple of hairy situations where the first concern that popped into my head was "will I be dragged over the coals if I have to use my weapon here?"
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2006, 14:26
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 64
Posts: 2,278
Received 37 Likes on 15 Posts
Jean Charles de Menezes may not have been the terrorist that the police believed he was, but if he had not been an ILLEGAL OCCUPANT of the UK, and had gone home when his 6 month visit Visa had expired, he would still be alive.

Maybe, he was unlucky, but he was still a criminal.

Thankfully, I wasn't in the same position as the cops who had to make the (Right) decision, with no possibly no chance of making a second decision if it had gone wrong.

The sooner the UK gets tough on Terrorists and other criminals the better.

The current state of the Law in the UK is, IMHO, not worth defending.

And the answer to the original question, Lee Clegg should be totally exonerated and, like many criminals, be given a handsome payout by HMG.
ZH875 is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2006, 14:28
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by ZH875
Jean Charles de Menezes may not have been the terrorist that the police believed he was, but if he had not been an ILLEGAL OCCUPANT of the UK, and had gone home when his 6 month visit Visa had expired, he would still be alive.

Maybe, he was unlucky, but he was still a criminal.

Thankfully, I wasn't in the same position as the cops who had to make the (Right) decision, with no possibly no chance of making a second decision if it had gone wrong.

The sooner the UK gets tough on Terrorists and other criminals the better.

The current state of the Law in the UK is, IMHO, not worth defending.
So being shot dead is a fitting punishment for over-staying your student visa?

Hmmm, Judge Dredd will soon be upon us....
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2006, 14:36
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 64
Posts: 2,278
Received 37 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by The Helpful Stacker
So being shot dead is a fitting punishment for over-staying your student visa?

Hmmm, Judge Dredd will soon be upon us....
Only if you overstay by several years.

Maybe we can start ethnic cleansing, by getting rid of rogue asylum seekers and Muppets at the same time.
ZH875 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.