Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Does Cpl Clegg get exonerated now?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Does Cpl Clegg get exonerated now?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Jul 2006, 14:38
  #21 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: LONDON
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But what about Cpl Clegg?
movadinkampa747 is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2006, 14:44
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Englandshire, mostly.
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BellEndBob
An absolute shambles. The Police cocked it up from start to finish and the idiots with the guns lost control IMHO. SEVEN bullets? Not only should there be charges but some of those in so called charge should be sacked as well.
British Police Service, what a joke.
In actual fact, Police SOPs dictate that in order to neutralise a suicide bomber, you must shoot him/her in the head 5 times. This is supposed to ensure that he/she is in no way capable of pressing the trigger & taking people out.

Of the seven bullets fired, one missed and one hit the suspects shoulder. The remaining five bullets hit his head as per SOPs. In other words, the armed police officers followed their orders to the letter IMHO.

The guys with the guns entered the underground with instructions to shoot. An order to hold fire was subsequently issued however, due to the fire team being underground, they never received it. That is an acknowledged fact.

It's a nasty case but slating the guys is not going to solve anything. The Police made a mistake this time however, I'm sure they will save many lives on future ops.
Tombstone is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2006, 14:45
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 518 Likes on 216 Posts
Sounds like Cpl Clegg got the dirty end of the stick here!

What is it he was supposed to have done wrong?

Perhaps vehicles that refuse to stop at a VCP should just be waved at and ignored?
SASless is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2006, 14:46
  #24 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: LONDON
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hello. Cpl Clegg. He was the para who shot at the joyriders in NI and ended up being done for it before his conviction was quashed.........
movadinkampa747 is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2006, 14:47
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Englandshire, mostly.
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Put it on the Army Forum.
Tombstone is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2006, 14:49
  #26 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: LONDON
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you are referring to Cpl Clegg can I remind you of the title to this thread?
movadinkampa747 is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2006, 14:53
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
At the time of the Cpl Clegg case ROE's in Ulster allowed troops to shoot at vehicles if they were being driven in a way that would endanger you or your patrol. Infact it wasn't that long ago that mainland UK ROE's had such a clause.
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2006, 14:55
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Englandshire, mostly.
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thats a very good point however, not being a squaddie, I do not know enough about the incident to offer an educated reply reference Cpl Clegg.

Is he still serving?
Tombstone is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2006, 15:19
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 2 m South of Radstock VRP
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by The Helpful Stacker
CPS - "Why did you fire 7 rounds into the suspect?"

Copper - "Because my pistol jammed".



It does seem strange when troops who served in Iraq have their identities splashed across the press and are hounded by the CPS over an alleged murder that had no body, no witnesses and no motive whereas a few coppers who definately need to read up the white card ROE's 'get away' with the cold-blooded murder of an innocent by-stander in a London tube station.
Still nothing to do with Cpl Clegg but http://www.arrse.co.uk/cpgn2/Forums/...start=240.html maybe of interest/value.
GOLF_BRAVO_ZULU is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2006, 15:40
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Grassy Knoll
Age: 60
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ZH875
Only if you overstay by several years.

Maybe we can start ethnic cleansing, by getting rid of rogue asylum seekers and Muppets at the same time.
You can't do that..... the Palace of Westminster would be empty in no time at all


Oops spelling a weak point again !!
Summer Twosay is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2006, 16:50
  #31 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: France 46
Age: 77
Posts: 1,743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was it not the case that the rules of engagement extant at the time, and adhered to by Cpl Clegg, were not valid under NI Law? Subsequently, it was found that they were not valid under Scottish law either. The rules had to be redrafted and we ended up with different rules depending where you were in UK, and the total nonsense of different challenges by "Gate Guards" dependant on whether their weapon was loaded or not.

The cases are not dissimilar in that the person who pulls the trigger has a right to expect that their actions, in accordance with the orders that they have been given by a superior, are lawful.

If Cpl Clegg had NOT opened fire, would he have been charged with "Dereliction of Duty"?
cazatou is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2006, 17:12
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The Roman Empire
Posts: 2,452
Received 73 Likes on 33 Posts
It is a long time ago now, and I haven't done any research on the matter, but I seem to remember that the scenario was along the following lines. Cpl Clegg fired several, 3-4 shots, at a car as it approached him and failed to stop. Most of the shots were considered "legal" (for want of a better term) as the car was still appraoching him, but the last shot was considered "illegal" in that the car was now abreast him and going away, hence no longer fullfilling the criteria he was given.

Pretty tough call for a scared 18 year old to make, in the cold and dark, while lawers debated it at length in the subsequent luxury of a courtroom.

Still, my recollection could be wrong, it wouldn't be the first time......
Biggus is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2006, 17:17
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 518 Likes on 216 Posts
Well for all you that have cried there is no prosecution for murder in the subway shooting, you can rest easy as a much worse charge is forthcoming....something about violating HSE regulations! Now that is a fate worse than death in these days and times!
SASless is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2006, 18:12
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Highlands
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cazatou
Given the news that NO individuals will face charges over the shooting of an innocent man at Stockwell Underground Station; is it not time that Cpl Clegg of the Parachute Regt is formally exonerated for carrying out his duty at a VCP in N Ireland?
Good point, just shows the mentality towards the forces as opposed to the Civvy Police, strikes a similar chord to that on the 'Uniform at Airports' thread, gives the impression that the Military is something to be ashamed of. Absolute disgrace IMHO.
rock_dove is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2006, 18:27
  #35 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: France 46
Age: 77
Posts: 1,743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We have to remember that the Police Unit that supplied the Firearms Personnel for this Incident was the same unit whose Personnel shot dead a man carrying a self loading,semi automatic table leg in a carrier bag. The information resulting in this action emanated from someone in a Pub!
cazatou is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.