Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

British JSF - Has it got an IFR probe?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

British JSF - Has it got an IFR probe?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Jul 2006, 20:37
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Southampton
Posts: 859
Received 49 Likes on 23 Posts
British JSF - Has it got an IFR probe?

Has anyone seen a photo of the British version of the JSF (or Dave) with an IFR probe? The Yanks will want a receptical for a boom for theirs and there doesn't seem much room to fit a probe up front for the RAF / RN aircraft.
Saintsman is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2006, 20:45
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by Saintsman
Has anyone seen a photo of the British version of the JSF (or Dave) with an IFR probe? The Yanks will want a receptical for a boom for theirs and there doesn't seem much room to fit a probe up front for the RAF / RN aircraft.
It'll probably end up with a bodged on one like the mud-moving Tonka.
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2006, 22:03
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Just behind the back of beyond....
Posts: 4,185
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
The USN and USMC use probe and drogue, so the F-35B and C have an extraordinarily compact retractable probe installation.
Jackonicko is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2006, 22:05
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Both carrier & jump Daves have retractable prods
RonO is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2006, 14:59
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Falmouth
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I saw the JSF at Yeovilton today and there wasn't a fixed IFR probe.
vecvechookattack is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2006, 19:15
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Witney UK
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If it has a dinky little probe I hope it is large and long enough to accept the larger centre line drogue, assuming that the larger drogue is still around when the JSF gets here. There is a history to this in that the Scimitar had this problem many years ago.
Art Field is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2006, 21:38
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chennai
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It carries a refueling probe fitted into the right side of the forward fuselage, rather than the U.S. Air Force standard refueling receptacle normally located on the top surface of the aircraft.

http://www.lockheedmartin.com/wms/fi...=0&ti=0&sc=400
Jaguar001 is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2006, 22:44
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: United States of Bradford
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Eh!??? You need a probe to fly in cloud????
dolphinops is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2006, 23:35
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote from the link at Post #7:
'...a missionized external gun is an option.'

Missionized. Anyone care to venture a definition?
Zoom is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2006, 02:51
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sale, Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Missionized = we'll buy bullets for this one.
Brian Abraham is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2006, 07:50
  #11 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,453
Received 1,618 Likes on 739 Posts
Missionized = The B and C have an optional external pod, unlike the A's internal gun. It fits on a dedicated centreline pylon, so it shouldn't waggle around as much as the old SUU-23....

Same gun as on the Typhoon, which means the same ammo. So if we buy the ammo and maintenance kit for the JSF, that means.......

27mm Gun Pod
ORAC is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2006, 07:59
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chennai
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought RAF did not fit guns on its Typhoons, only missiles.
Jaguar001 is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2006, 10:08
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jaguar001
I thought RAF did not fit guns on its Typhoons, only missiles.
That is incorrect. The RAF typhoons have the fully working gun fitted to the airframe. When they decided that they weren't going to employ the gun opetationally they tried filling the gun space with concrete but this shot the flight characteristics to pieces. So... kept the gun where it is so as not to screw up their new jet and just decided to not purchse bullets and support kit. Hope its worth the 17 pence it is probably saving them
sense1 is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2006, 10:17
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by sense1
That is incorrect. The RAF typhoons have the fully working gun fitted to the airframe. When they decided that they weren't going to employ the gun opetationally they tried filling the gun space with concrete but this shot the flight characteristics to pieces. So... kept the gun where it is so as not to screw up their new jet and just decided to not purchse bullets and support kit. Hope its worth the 17 pence it is probably saving them
If the Typhoon is ever used in anger I forsee a UOR being issued double quick time.
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2006, 15:28
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If a Typhoon got into a gunfight, hasn't it failed already????. Best to light the coals and get out of Dodge!
L J R is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2006, 15:46
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by L J R
If a Typhoon got into a gunfight, hasn't it failed already????. Best to light the coals and get out of Dodge!
Ahh but the tranche 3 a/c are going to be air to ground capable apparently and 27mm rounds are cheaper than bombs and rockets.
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2006, 16:29
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 64
Posts: 2,278
Received 37 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by The Helpful Stacker
Ahh but the tranche 3 a/c are going to be air to ground capable apparently and 27mm rounds are cheaper than bombs and rockets.
Ah, but is the RAF actually going to get any Tranche 3 aircraft....
ZH875 is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2006, 17:08
  #18 (permalink)  
CBA_caption
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
If the F22 has got a gun (and a bigger one than ours) why can't we have one?

http://www.f22-raptor.com/media/vide...os/04_006L.WMV

about 1:45 in
 
Old 9th Jul 2006, 17:28
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Missionized = The B and C have an optional external pod, unlike the A's internal gun. It fits on a dedicated centreline pylon, so it shouldn't waggle around as much as the old SUU-23....
So what will that do to the aircrafts' stealth characteristics? Doesn't that defeat the object of a lot of expense?
LFFC is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2006, 22:51
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not clear that an op requiring high degrees of LO would involve blasting away with a popgun at PB ranges. Anyhow, will Gordo be pursuaded to actually buy any pods given they're not needed for Harrier.

PS does anybody really believe that bull**** about concrete guns? Were they more successful making blue circle bullets? Were pilots were required for the same reason?
RonO is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.