Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

RED ARROWS Question

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

RED ARROWS Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Jul 2006, 16:51
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: se england
Posts: 1,588
Likes: 0
Received 49 Likes on 22 Posts
RED ARROWS Question

I live near Camberley in Surrey and hence close to Farnborough. With the airshow ina couple of weeks we are approaching the period when 'the sound of Freedom' as the USAF refered to its fighters in the fifties is common.

However Iwas very surprised today when the gentle whine of airbusses in and out of LHR was replaced arround noon by 15 mins of military turbojet noise (great )

I couldnt figure out what this was as the cloud was so low that nothing at all could be seen until close to the end of the spell one of the red arrows hurtled past 500 ft agl? (I know its hard to tell but anyway pretty low) and literaly just skiimming the bottom of the cloud.

Now every show year we see the Reds practice beforehand and some of their routines have singles or pairs arcing back over Camberley and thats not new but Iwas amazed at them trying display flying in what seemed awful weather with rain and very low clouds.

Of course I am not suggesting for a second anyone was taking any risks and I know they have a different routine for low cloud base days. Today however I only saw one plane inside twenty odd mins and any pull up type routine must have had them in cloud in secomds so not much to see if any spectators. So I was left admiring the guys flying but wondering how realistic practice is in such awful conditions as today and indeed what the reds 'minimums' actually are.

Interested in any replies-thanks in advance and hoping for sunnier skies in a couple of weeks 'cos we always get a great free show several times in the showweek.
PB
pax britanica is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2006, 16:56
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: TBC
Posts: 719
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Can't clear that question up for you i'm afraid, but you've just explained why they all went over my house at 0945 this morning . Certainly brightened up my Friday.

Ginger
Gingerbread Man is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2006, 16:57
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: North Yorkshire
Age: 82
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They were checking out the venue ready for the Farnborough Airshow on the 20 - 22 July.
Clockwork Mouse is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2006, 19:02
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,132
Received 28 Likes on 17 Posts
Aye, they were hammering the air above my married quarter a fair bit at lunchtime.

Blooming noisey buggers, don't they know some of us are sleeping off nights.
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2006, 19:12
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Watched the display from FSI at FAB and they never entered cloud at all from my vantage point. Did see three or four of them go around at the end of their display.



refplus20 is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2006, 20:16
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: England
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They were not checking out the venue - rather the venue was checking them out. Farnborough is the only venue in the world which insists on validating the Reds display before allowing them to perform before the public.
vmv2 is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2006, 02:48
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Not a huge sand box but very nice winters anymore
Age: 57
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why doesn't a Farnborough rep just go to a previous airshow and have a look. Cheeky buggers
saudipc-9 is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2006, 07:41
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Age: 60
Posts: 2,717
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
I think that's all to do with the very constrained area for some aspects of display flying at Farnborough these days.
Wycombe is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2006, 08:09
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Road to Nowhere
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think we should tell them to get stuffed!

STH
SirToppamHat is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2006, 08:53
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 685
Received 11 Likes on 6 Posts
Will Blackbushe be insisting on validating the B-52 display for this year?
hoodie is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2006, 09:16
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: England
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I cannot imagine the stupidity of the clowns who have the arrogance to insist each year on this 'validation'. Cheeky sods
Is there one man among them who would dare say, ooh dear, can't have that here guv - too precise and far too professional for the crowds here
If the Pope visits I suppose they will want some sort of proof he is 'the man'.
the venue was checking them out. Farnborough is the only venue in the world which insists on validating the Reds display
Somebody should tell Farnborough to waken up to reality and be thankfull the REDS darken their airspace.
TG
Tartan Giant is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2006, 15:01
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Falmouth
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I suppose if you atre paying a lot of money for a team/aircraft to conduct a display you want to get your monies worth. Is the Farnborough validation a CAA reg ?
vecvechookattack is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2006, 17:53
  #13 (permalink)  
Drain Bamaged
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Earth
Age: 56
Posts: 536
Received 38 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by pax britanica
So I was left admiring the guys flying but wondering how realistic practice is in such awful conditions as today
And this is supposed to be "a validation" flight !?
ehwatezedoing is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2006, 18:01
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They have had the odd prang at the show over the years and are entitled to protect the viewers. Good for them, I say. It's probably in their insurance small print anyway.
Zoom is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2006, 18:09
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Not a huge sand box but very nice winters anymore
Age: 57
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They have had the odd prang at the show over the years and are entitled to protect the viewers
That is why there are regulations governing what can and cannot be done at air shows and the distances, which must be maintained depending on what manoeuvre is being flown. All air shows must abide by the same rules and regulations
saudipc-9 is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2006, 10:06
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,839
Received 100 Likes on 73 Posts
It's a hard & fast rule that EVERY display at Farnborough has to be approved at Farnborough, the only exception ever made being for some BBMF aircraft which have limited airframe life. And yes, they have been 'pulled' for an unsafe manouevre in the past; that was when CFCC was a serving Group Captain, and he 'interviewed' the culprit.
chevvron is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2006, 19:03
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,848
Received 328 Likes on 115 Posts
Was that the moustachioed CFCC who wears that Kwik-Fit fitter's overall on his TV appearances?

Last edited by BEagle; 10th Jul 2006 at 08:55.
BEagle is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2006, 08:35
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,839
Received 100 Likes on 73 Posts
Can't actually remember 'cos COEF used to change every two years!
chevvron is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.