Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Pictures of JSF / F-35 pre-rollout and naming today

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Pictures of JSF / F-35 pre-rollout and naming today

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Jul 2006, 13:28
  #21 (permalink)  
Suspicion breeds confidence
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gibraltar
Posts: 2,405
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Saw the Lightning II at Yeovilton today .....very impressive although it looked a tadge small.....smaller than a SHAR. (But faster and with more gadgets)
Actually its quite a bit bigger which is why it could not operate off a CVS.
Navaleye is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2006, 13:44
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
Didn't the Russians build a VSTOL a/c that used the two engine approach. Apparently it couldn't carry much more than its own weight?

It relied on fixed vertical lift fans for vertical flight that were dead weight in horizontal flight.
Hmmmm.
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2006, 23:01
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yo Taildragger,

Lightning II because it's the second Lightning in US service and the second in UK's.

If you still want to get picky, go ask those silly asses at EE why they thought theirs was the first.
RonO is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2006, 07:09
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Royal Berkshire
Posts: 1,739
Received 77 Likes on 39 Posts
Originally Posted by RonO
Yo Taildragger,

Lightning II because it's the second Lightning in US service and the second in UK's.

If you still want to get picky, go ask those silly asses at EE why they thought theirs was the first.
Actually, it could loosely be argued that it'd be the 3rd in UK service and 1st to be actually named by the the US, in US service as you lot weren't going to call the P-38 the Lightning, you lot wanted to call it the Atalanta.....

The original useless un-blown P-38 was called Lightning when entered into RAF service but was rejected soon after with the order for the next batch cancelled.

The US then later adopted the Lightning name itself.

So, the nice folks at EE never thought theirs was the first......even though it'll still always be the best.......
GeeRam is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2006, 10:43
  #25 (permalink)  
brickhistory
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by GeeRam
Actually, it could loosely be argued that it'd be the 3rd in UK service and 1st to be actually named by the the US, in US service as you lot weren't going to call the P-38 the Lightning, you lot wanted to call it the Atalanta.....
The original useless un-blown P-38 was called Lightning when entered into RAF service but was rejected soon after with the order for the next batch cancelled.
The US then later adopted the Lightning name itself.
So, the nice folks at EE never thought theirs was the first......even though it'll still always be the best.......
Well done on the obscure Atalanta!
And for EE for designing the jet Lightning when it was beyond cutting edge. Too bad "you lot" don't still have that capability.........
 
Old 10th Jul 2006, 14:21
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Royal Berkshire
Posts: 1,739
Received 77 Likes on 39 Posts
Originally Posted by brickhistory
Too bad "you lot" don't still have that capability.........
Us lot over here could have still had the capability (maybe still has if it was allowed) if those elected over the years by the great unwashed of this isle had wanted to continue making the required investment to do so.......
GeeRam is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2006, 14:32
  #27 (permalink)  
brickhistory
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by GeeRam
Us lot over here could have still had the capability (maybe still has if it was allowed) if those elected over the years by the great unwashed of this isle had wanted to continue making the required investment to do so.......

Other than mild humo(u)r, please don't take my comment too harshly.

Frankly, I wish you still did have the capability. Not only has the British aerospace built some absolutely fantastic machines, but some more good healthy rivals abroad would make my countries' few remaining aerospace firms more responsive, more innovative, and less arrogant.
 
Old 10th Jul 2006, 18:57
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So if EE knew they were the second why didn't they name accordingly?
RonO is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2006, 19:02
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
oops just woke up and realized you chaps don't do that otherwise it would be Typhoon 2 or II. So I guess Dave will just be Lightning.
RonO is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2006, 19:51
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Royal Berkshire
Posts: 1,739
Received 77 Likes on 39 Posts
Originally Posted by RonO
So I guess Dave will just be Lightning.
Nope.........Dave will be the Dave I reckon over here

Can't ever seeing it being refered to the name Lightning over here.......

The Frightning maybe, but not endearingly, more because it's frightningly ugly......

Mind you, nearly 20 years on from it's retirement, there's not many ex-Lightning people left in now to get the hump about it...?

And as for us not doing the Lightning II or whatever, I seem to recall most including the US service's always called the A-10 the A-10 Warthog rather than the A-10 Thunderbolt II or how many actually refered to the F-4 as the Phantom II.......

Anyway, banter aside, I can't believe the powers that be are that mentally challanged that we can't come up with an unused name. It's not as if we have to come up with 10-20 new names a year is it......
GeeRam is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2006, 07:00
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cow Corner
Posts: 232
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Apart from the... er.... Dave, I know of the Wokka, Tonka, Fat Albert and Timmy & Tommy.

are there any other names, and if so how did they come about?
BombayDuck is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.