Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

FSTA Update

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th May 2006, 12:32
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Witney UK
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FSTA Update

Quote from Saintsman on A400 thread:"The first two FSTA aircraft are still on course to be converted at the beginning of 2008, with the first one due in service April 2010.

The contractual negotiations are taking their time because its not just about providing a fleet of aircraft. Its a complete package supplying aircraft, aircrew, groundcrew and all the support that goes with it for twenty odd years.

There are also severe penalties if the aircraft are not available. In this case the blame has to be correctly apportioned to the individual companies within the AirTanker consortium. This is one of the reasons the contractual negotiations are taking their time. You have to get these things right.

Leasing the aircraft to civil operators helps subsidise the cost although IMO I think that there will be so much demand from the MOD that they will never be leased out."

Whilst it is great to hear news of some possible progress, all these contractual problems were envisaged in the initial request for the tender so long ago. As far as blame for non availability is concerned, surely not MOD's problem. The contract will be with Air Tanker, not the individual members of the consortium. Certainly, in the light of previous MOD contract outcomes, things should be well right before commitment but lets get on with it. If the rumours of a drop in the total number of aircraft from around 22 to around 12 are true then the chances of spare capacity will be very small.
Art Field is offline  
Old 19th May 2006, 12:55
  #2 (permalink)  
Hellbound
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Blighty
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mmmmmm, think you might find that the numbers reduced are the ones available to the front line, while the delta will be passed (un-mod'd) to the contractor to generate 3PR. Of course, we will be able to get the others back and mod them up in time for any eventuality.....honest.
South Bound is offline  
Old 19th May 2006, 19:39
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surely grounds for concern when the contract requires more man hours to create than the kit
RonO is offline  
Old 19th May 2006, 19:43
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: In Hyperspace...
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its a complete package supplying aircraft, aircrew, groundcrew and all the support that goes with it for twenty odd years.
Err...Air Tanker are supplying the Aircrew?

So we're not going to fly it then?
TheInquisitor is offline  
Old 19th May 2006, 19:47
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I heard that you are all going to PVR in protest at JPA, Capped Actuals etc, and that there will be a surplus of AAR types around the bazzars to fill the cockpits.
L J R is offline  
Old 19th May 2006, 23:04
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Err...Air Tanker are supplying the Aircrew?

So we're not going to fly it then?
I'm pretty sure that the RAF will provide the crews to fly the aircraft that will always be on the military register. AirTanker will provide civilian crews to fly the few aircraft that are in civilian colours. When those aircraft are swapped back to the military register, the civilian crews will come with them and fly them as Reservists.
LFFC is offline  
Old 20th May 2006, 09:27
  #7 (permalink)  

Inter Arma Enim Silentius Lex Legis
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: England
Posts: 733
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel

Who the hell would be mad enough to sign up as a reservist under those conditions?

The Gorilla is offline  
Old 20th May 2006, 09:34
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: In Hyperspace...
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Depends on what they're paying....
TheInquisitor is offline  
Old 20th May 2006, 10:48
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,817
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
The daft PFI concept does indeed include hiring mercenaries....

Except that the civil serpents prefer to call them 'sponsored reservists'.
BEagle is online now  
Old 20th May 2006, 11:12
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: location location
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
This really is a ludicrous PFI. Have the poiticians forgotten that you can't make a profit out of Defence? It involves keeping some assets sitting around doing nothing in peace time and training personnel continuously so they are available when you need them.

Also, we can't have mil pilots flying civil aircraft on revenue tasks because -
Oh yes. We'd have to give the pilots an ATPL as part of the OCU. Then we wouldn't have any pilots at all
propulike is offline  
Old 20th May 2006, 15:52
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This really is a ludicrous PFI. Have the poiticians forgotten that you can't make a profit out of Defence? It involves keeping some assets sitting around doing nothing in peace time and training personnel continuously so they are available when you need them.
First of all, lots of people make a profit out of defence - especially BAES and a few other defence companies...

Actually, of all the military PFIs that I've been told about, FSTA does seem to make some sense. As you said above, the Armed Forces are all about preparation during peacetime, so in theory you won't need to use a proportion of your military kit during peacetime. Unfortunately, most military kit can't be put to civilian use - but an aircraft like an A330 can be (just so long as it doesn't have any of the military toys fitted and is properly registered).

Also, we can't have mil pilots flying civil aircraft on revenue tasks because -
From what I understand, it will only be civilian pilots that fly civilian owned and civilian registered FSTA on revenue tasks.

Oh yes. We'd have to give the pilots an ATPL as part of the OCU. Then we wouldn't have any pilots at all
From what I hear, you have that problem in the ME world already!!
LFFC is offline  
Old 21st May 2006, 12:33
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Close to Wales
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would gladly do a towline or so a month. Not too sure about SDO though!
exvicar is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.