FSTA Update
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Witney UK
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FSTA Update
Quote from Saintsman on A400 thread:"The first two FSTA aircraft are still on course to be converted at the beginning of 2008, with the first one due in service April 2010.
The contractual negotiations are taking their time because its not just about providing a fleet of aircraft. Its a complete package supplying aircraft, aircrew, groundcrew and all the support that goes with it for twenty odd years.
There are also severe penalties if the aircraft are not available. In this case the blame has to be correctly apportioned to the individual companies within the AirTanker consortium. This is one of the reasons the contractual negotiations are taking their time. You have to get these things right.
Leasing the aircraft to civil operators helps subsidise the cost although IMO I think that there will be so much demand from the MOD that they will never be leased out."
Whilst it is great to hear news of some possible progress, all these contractual problems were envisaged in the initial request for the tender so long ago. As far as blame for non availability is concerned, surely not MOD's problem. The contract will be with Air Tanker, not the individual members of the consortium. Certainly, in the light of previous MOD contract outcomes, things should be well right before commitment but lets get on with it. If the rumours of a drop in the total number of aircraft from around 22 to around 12 are true then the chances of spare capacity will be very small.
The contractual negotiations are taking their time because its not just about providing a fleet of aircraft. Its a complete package supplying aircraft, aircrew, groundcrew and all the support that goes with it for twenty odd years.
There are also severe penalties if the aircraft are not available. In this case the blame has to be correctly apportioned to the individual companies within the AirTanker consortium. This is one of the reasons the contractual negotiations are taking their time. You have to get these things right.
Leasing the aircraft to civil operators helps subsidise the cost although IMO I think that there will be so much demand from the MOD that they will never be leased out."
Whilst it is great to hear news of some possible progress, all these contractual problems were envisaged in the initial request for the tender so long ago. As far as blame for non availability is concerned, surely not MOD's problem. The contract will be with Air Tanker, not the individual members of the consortium. Certainly, in the light of previous MOD contract outcomes, things should be well right before commitment but lets get on with it. If the rumours of a drop in the total number of aircraft from around 22 to around 12 are true then the chances of spare capacity will be very small.
Hellbound
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Blighty
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mmmmmm, think you might find that the numbers reduced are the ones available to the front line, while the delta will be passed (un-mod'd) to the contractor to generate 3PR. Of course, we will be able to get the others back and mod them up in time for any eventuality.....honest.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: In Hyperspace...
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Its a complete package supplying aircraft, aircrew, groundcrew and all the support that goes with it for twenty odd years.
So we're not going to fly it then?
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Err...Air Tanker are supplying the Aircrew?
So we're not going to fly it then?
So we're not going to fly it then?
The daft PFI concept does indeed include hiring mercenaries....
Except that the civil serpents prefer to call them 'sponsored reservists'.
Except that the civil serpents prefer to call them 'sponsored reservists'.
This really is a ludicrous PFI. Have the poiticians forgotten that you can't make a profit out of Defence? It involves keeping some assets sitting around doing nothing in peace time and training personnel continuously so they are available when you need them.
Also, we can't have mil pilots flying civil aircraft on revenue tasks because -
Oh yes. We'd have to give the pilots an ATPL as part of the OCU. Then we wouldn't have any pilots at all
Also, we can't have mil pilots flying civil aircraft on revenue tasks because -
Oh yes. We'd have to give the pilots an ATPL as part of the OCU. Then we wouldn't have any pilots at all
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This really is a ludicrous PFI. Have the poiticians forgotten that you can't make a profit out of Defence? It involves keeping some assets sitting around doing nothing in peace time and training personnel continuously so they are available when you need them.
Actually, of all the military PFIs that I've been told about, FSTA does seem to make some sense. As you said above, the Armed Forces are all about preparation during peacetime, so in theory you won't need to use a proportion of your military kit during peacetime. Unfortunately, most military kit can't be put to civilian use - but an aircraft like an A330 can be (just so long as it doesn't have any of the military toys fitted and is properly registered).
Also, we can't have mil pilots flying civil aircraft on revenue tasks because -
Oh yes. We'd have to give the pilots an ATPL as part of the OCU. Then we wouldn't have any pilots at all