Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

New US Coastguard Pistol

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

New US Coastguard Pistol

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th May 2006, 13:29
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: (LFA 7a)
Age: 64
Posts: 738
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
New US Coastguard Pistol

The US Coastguard is part of the US military.
The US Coastguard have recently adopted a new pistol to replace the "issued" 9mm Barretta.
It is the Sig Sauer S226 in .40 caliber.
They are also adopting a new round with either "soft point or hollow point bullets".
Forgive me for being picky, but I thought that such "types" of bullets were against the Geneva Convention.

Im not worried that much as any shots fired at you by the mil must mean that one is up to no good and such bullets might put one down instead of punching straight through. But hollow points in use by the mil?????
jimgriff is offline  
Old 11th May 2006, 13:49
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kammbronn
Posts: 2,122
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
It rather looks as if USCG are planning on going up against non-signatories to the Convention.
diginagain is offline  
Old 11th May 2006, 14:10
  #3 (permalink)  
More bang for your buck
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: land of the clanger
Age: 82
Posts: 3,512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I tought the convention aplied to countries fighting wars, not coast guards fighting criminals.
green granite is offline  
Old 11th May 2006, 14:10
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by jimgriff
The US Coastguard is part of the US military.
The US Coastguard have recently adopted a new pistol to replace the "issued" 9mm Barretta.
It is the Sig Sauer S226 in .40 caliber.
They are also adopting a new round with either "soft point or hollow point bullets".
Forgive me for being picky, but I thought that such "types" of bullets were against the Geneva Convention.
Im not worried that much as any shots fired at you by the mil must mean that one is up to no good and such bullets might put one down instead of punching straight through. But hollow points in use by the mil?????
Hollow points are against the Geneva Convention but the US Coast Guard, although part of the US Military, also has a major civil policing role. In the US civil police it is common to use hollow points to stop 'through and through' shots, a common occurrence with FMJ's. As long as they are not using hollow points in a military role they do not fall foul of the convention.
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 11th May 2006, 16:05
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: US
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To put a fine point on it, many armies use hollow-point bullets in limited applications. Specifically, the match grade ammunition used by snipers is usually a hollow-point boat-tail. In this instance, the hollow-point is not designed for expansion, but rather for accuracy. For example, see the bullets used in the Federal Gold Match .308.
OFBSLF is offline  
Old 11th May 2006, 16:42
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just a small point of legal pickiness I suppose, but the U.S. Coast Guard is part of the Department of Homeland Security. It used to be part ofthe Transportation Department and before that was part of Commerce, Treasury and I don't know who else. In time of war the USCG can be activated and become part of the Navy the same was the Federal Aviation Administration can become part of the Air Force.

They are organized on military lines and have partly a law enforcement function, partly environmental, partly SAR and partly other safety for the navaigable waters of the U.S. and partly every other thing that happens on aor in the water. And good luck to them regardless of the type of weapon they carry, with their budget I'm suprised it isn't cutlasses and Navy Colt revolvers.
Iron City is offline  
Old 11th May 2006, 16:42
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: England
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
USCG

Correct me if I am wrong, but the US Coast Guard is now part of the Department for Homeland Defense, and not the DOD. Accordingly, they can use what weapons they like...
Cambridge Crash is offline  
Old 11th May 2006, 21:55
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Retired to Bisley from the small African nation
Age: 68
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Errr...
Its the Hague Convention
and its not completely prescriptive
See
http://www.thegunzone.com/hague.html
Sven
Sven Sixtoo is offline  
Old 11th May 2006, 23:36
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: London
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Iron City
And good luck to them regardless of the type of weapon they carry, with their budget I'm suprised it isn't cutlasses and Navy Colt revolvers.
Just to put this into some kind of perspective, the USCG is now actually larger than the RN in terms of personnel at least (43,000 vs 38,000, IIRC). Plus the USCG is undergoing the major 'Deepwater' recapitalisation programme, including the provision of Bell 'EagleEye' tiltrotor and Global Hawk UAV's, systems the RN can only dream of.
Lazer-Hound is offline  
Old 12th May 2006, 03:00
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,300
Received 523 Likes on 218 Posts
Whinging Poms!

For you Whinging Poms that have nothing else to worry about except what kind of pistol bullet the USCG uses....consider this fact. They also use Barrett .50 caliber rifles too. Along with Browning M-2 .50 Caliber machine guns, and five inch guns on Cutters. I would also assume their boarding parties carry automatic weapons and knives along with Stun Grenades and Frags. Horrors yet....they may even carry 12 Gauge Shotguns with Buckshot or Flechette rounds.

When was the last time the Geneva Convention really mattered to the Terrorists and Drug Smugglers out there? Ever watch a video of a terrorist beheading a hostage?

They can also call in Air Force and Navy attack aircraft if need be....what's a pistol bullet compared to a 2,000 pound JDAM?

Get a life guys!
SASless is online now  
Old 12th May 2006, 04:44
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kammbronn
Posts: 2,122
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
When was the last time the Geneva Convention really mattered to the Terrorists and Drug Smugglers out there?
My point, precisely. Succinct as ever, SASless.
diginagain is offline  
Old 12th May 2006, 05:57
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by SASless
For you Whinging Poms that have nothing else to worry about except what kind of pistol bullet the USCG uses....consider this fact. They also use Barrett .50 caliber rifles too. Along with Browning M-2 .50 Caliber machine guns, and five inch guns on Cutters. I would also assume their boarding parties carry automatic weapons and knives along with Stun Grenades and Frags. Horrors yet....they may even carry 12 Gauge Shotguns with Buckshot or Flechette rounds.
When was the last time the Geneva Convention really mattered to the Terrorists and Drug Smugglers out there? Ever watch a video of a terrorist beheading a hostage?
They can also call in Air Force and Navy attack aircraft if need be....what's a pistol bullet compared to a 2,000 pound JDAM?
Get a life guys!
That whizzing noise is most of the thread sailing over your head SASless. Once again you jump to defending the US without actually reading what many have put.

In fact on this thread there is perhaps only one person who could possibly be described as 'whinging' (although they were just asking a question of legality, not bemoaning a round they might get hit with were they to do something that required it), everybody else as far as I can tell is purely answering the question in one form or the other.

Now step away from the keyboard and take a nice big breath.
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 12th May 2006, 10:08
  #13 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: (LFA 7a)
Age: 64
Posts: 738
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
I personally would rather take out some scum using a .40 JHP that a FMJ 9mm any day.
I just asked the question.

BTW the Barratt .50 cal sniper weapon is a great bit of kit. Yes, I have fired one on many occasions.

jimgriff is offline  
Old 12th May 2006, 11:37
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kammbronn
Posts: 2,122
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by jimgriff
BTW the Barratt .50 cal sniper weapon is a great bit of kit. Yes, I have fired one on many occasions.
Whilst I've only done dry drills on the Barratt, I have seen the consequences at the target end, so I suppose your definition of 'great' really depends on your perspective.
diginagain is offline  
Old 12th May 2006, 18:15
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, Deepwater sounds nice, but it is a program name that has been around 15 years or so and seldom gets the funding it is supposed to. The only good thing about the homeland security paranoia gripping the Congress has been the Coasties finally getting some decent gear to use... but at the same time they have V-22s, UAVs, tethered aerostats, and other unsupportable stuff of marginal mission utility thrust their way.
Iron City is offline  
Old 13th May 2006, 08:03
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
One of the civilian CP/BG guys in B'Dad lost his mag in the ac; when it was subsequently found, the rounds in it did not comply with any convention!!!!!

Pity the local who caught one.
Could be the last? is offline  
Old 13th May 2006, 13:36
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: US
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pity the local who caught one.
As opposed to the other locals who are only shot with the "gentle" FMJ rounds

Deadly force is deadly force.
OFBSLF is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.