Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

C-5 GALAXY CRASH DOVER

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

C-5 GALAXY CRASH DOVER

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Apr 2006, 13:33
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: ecosse
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bird strike theory sounds good
Throes of the the Nimrod crash - lost 2 engines due to ingesting 120 flying rats, (Seagulls or similar) at 800ft - no height to manoeuvre - crashed in the forest
This C5 crew (at AUW whilst dumping), were lucky to have had time to turn back towards the field, but unfortunately hit the undershoot
10/10 for the pilots with a difficult decision, which resulted in no loss of life!
buoy15 is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2006, 16:25
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Syracuse
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I see from the posted pics that the rear cargo door and ramp are open, would this be as a result of the impact ?
dionysius is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2006, 18:56
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And who said the C-5 has poor short field performance? They got it into that field no probs! Mind you, they should have remembered the old adage - "look well ahead, keep straight with rudder"!
grunt@dhfs.org is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2006, 20:22
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Here and there. Here at the moment but soon I'll be there.
Posts: 758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
More crash pictures here...

http://www.csharpprogrammer.com/images/c5crash.html

But be quick they'll only be there for 2 hours!! Sorry...

Please download them and pass on. If they aren't there when you look please PM me and I'll send them to you. If anyone has web space available that can host the pictures please let me know.


Last edited by SkyHawk-N; 6th Apr 2006 at 20:38.
SkyHawk-N is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2006, 21:05
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Trumpville; On the edge
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I see from the posted pics that the rear cargo door and ramp are open, would this be as a result of the impact ?
Possibly, although there is an SOP to jettison cargo in an emergency too - obviously depending on the circumstances. Not saying that this was the case here (considering populated area etc.) but it may have been a player.
Trumpet_trousers is offline  
Old 7th Apr 2006, 06:32
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,090
Received 58 Likes on 36 Posts
"Possibly, although there is an SOP to jettison cargo in an emergency too"

Really? Source please, particular to the C5.


And an immediate change in CG at a time when you least want it.
West Coast is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2006, 10:19
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Kent, UK
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From a modelling site, oddly enough (Hyperscale)

"This is the current skinny on the crash, -- none of it official -- until the board says so.

It was not a bird ingestion but a "reverser unlock" on the #2 engine that started this. They lost a C-5 with all aboard a few years back in Germany for the same cause. This crew however shut down the engine before an actual unstow took place. The airplane was well over 700K gross weight with FOB of over 300K. The airplane had the newest version of the C-5 flight deck with big panel glass. Unfortunately, only one of the three pilots was really comfortable with the new equipment and FMS.

The crew decided because of their weight to fly their approach to the longest runway, which unfortunately was only being served that day by a Tacan approach. They also decided to fly a full flap approach to keep the approach speed down. This is not prohibited--just highly discouraged. The recommended flap setting for a three engine approach is Flaps 40.

During the approach the crew became worried about not having enough power to fly a full flap approach and selected flaps 40--which they were now too slow for.

Here's the point all you glass cockpit guys should sit up and take notice about.The one guy who was familiar with the new glass and FMS was also the one flying the aircraft. He became distracted inputting the new approach speed in the FMS.

There was also some confusion about just who was flying the A/C while he had his head down updating the speed. Long story short--they got way slow and into the shaker, and actually stuck the tail into the trees and it departed the aircraft first. The nose pitched down hard and the nose and left wing impacted next snapping off the nose.

Several cockpit occupants suffered spinal compression injuries. The guys sitting at the crew table behind the cockpit actually came to a stop with their legs dangling out over the ground.

The miracle of this was the left outboard fuel tank was broken open and none of that fuel managed to find something hot enough to ignite it and the other 300k. Again, a bunch of very lucky people . . or unlucky ! "
WebPilot is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.