Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Supersonic Flying Wing.... whatever next...??

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Supersonic Flying Wing.... whatever next...??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Mar 2006, 05:53
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sverdlovsk
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Supersonic Flying Wing.... whatever next...??

Northrop Grumman Corporation has been selected by the U.S. Department of Defence to design the first-ever supersonic flying wing aircraft that can vary the sweep of its wing for the most efficient flight performance.
The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) has awarded a contract to Northrop Grummans Integrated Systems sector for the first phase of its Oblique Flying Wing (OFW) program, which aims to design and conduct flight tests of an experimental tailless, supersonic, variable-sweep flying wing. DARPAs goal is to demonstrate that such aircraft are feasible so that similar designs can be considered for future military missions.

The supersonic design envisioned by the OFW program offers potential benefits for missions requiring rapid deployment, long range and long endurance. In theory, an oblique flying wing could maximize its performance in every flight regime: takeoff or landing, high or low altitude, supersonic or subsonic speed.
During the programs first phase, which will conclude in November 2007, Northrop Grumman will conduct technology maturation to reduce the risk of the critical technologies associated with its OFW concepts and develop a preliminary design for the experimental aircraft. The preliminary design effort could be followed by a second phase to finalize the design, then build an experimental aircraft and flight test it. First flight of this "X-plane" is envisioned in 2010 or 2011.


GengisK



GengisKhant is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2006, 11:32
  #2 (permalink)  
Green Flash
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I thought this idea rang a bell -

http://www.globalaircraft.org/planes...blique_wing.pl
 
Old 30th Mar 2006, 12:52
  #3 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Barnes Wallis strikes again.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2006, 12:57
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Chilterns/Blighty
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was that nicknamed the 'slew wing' or am I confusing it with summat else?
Fokkerwokker is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2006, 14:10
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,829
Received 275 Likes on 111 Posts
As PN infers, Barnes Wallis 'Swallow' re-invented?

http://www.barneswallistrust.org/swingwing.htm
BEagle is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2006, 14:33
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dammit, Beags, you just beat me to the same link!

Good stuff this Google lark, innit?
FJJP is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2006, 15:49
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 518 Likes on 216 Posts
I am the one the Village is missing....however...

In the Swallow he used a flattened profile fuselage blending with the wing and contributing to total lift. The fin was eliminated and all control was provided by the engine pods. These were mounted in pairs towards the tips of the wings, one above and one below the aerofoil. They pivoted about all three axes, providing a constant thrust-line with variations in wing sweep, and served in place of rudder, ailerons and elevators.
Now if one wuz to have multiple engine failures on one side of this critter....or somehow run it out of fuel and have a total engine failure....would it not get a wee bit tricky to control?
SASless is online now  
Old 30th Mar 2006, 16:38
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With the technology of the day, very probably. However, given the state of modern computer technology, coupled with a number of years of experience and development, I have no doubt that the Swallow and its configuration could be easily controlled whatever the problem.

After all, NASA are now well on the way to perfecting computer software that will allow the pilot to use the flying control input devices [oh, all right - joystick!] to convert to engine behaviour in the event of a total loss of hydraulics [a la Sioux City]. It will take the trial and error out of the equation faced by the fantastic pilots who landed their flying control-less jets at Sioux City and Iraq.
FJJP is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2006, 18:07
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Elsewhere
Posts: 289
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
I think I remember reading about this in Meccano Magazine (now I really am dating myself).
k3k3 is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2006, 00:00
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: ecosse
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Didn't a Blue Peter team build one of these in the late 70's using a hollowed out banana, spatula and a coke can filled with lighter fuel?
One of the presenters (may have been John Noakes - "get down Shep") said it defied the law of aerodynamics, and, as it didn't fly normally, like birds do, could probably go from the studio to Cornwall and back in the dark whilst we were all asleep, and we wouldn't even know about it!
I missed the next programme as I was on detachment
What was the result?
buoy15 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.