Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Year Out of RAF Q!

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Year Out of RAF Q!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Mar 2006, 14:35
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: england
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry

Originally Posted by AllTrimDoubt
I think it is of every concern. Most people in ALL 3 Services - across the spectrum of commissioned/non-commissioned - are working bl**dy hard because of overstretch. And they have to work even harder because of selfish idiots like you whose ONLY concern is "what's in it for me" and then proposes a year off whilst everyone works even harder to cover your holiday. No way fella - if you worked for me the choice would be a simple one!
And if you were servicing my a/c I'd have a good look at the supervisory chain too!
And just to round off, I'm not sure - with your attitude - you'd fit into any cockpit environment - military or civil.
There - does THAT help?
I think that just about sums up why most of the engineers are fooked off in the RAF . The guy is asking a simple question about wether or not he can have a year out, which it appears he is perfectly entitled to, to try and better himself and move his carreer along, not for the opinions of some jumped up knobber who obviously thinks he is better than a mere engineer. Then you have the cheek to question his technical ability and standards of work, I mean if the guy wants to fly proffesionally I seriously doubt he is going to not do his job properly, and risk the life of a supposedly "fellow" aviator, how dare you be so rude? Do you think he should just accept he's a ground crew scumbag, like all of the other mere mortals that keep "your" A/c flying safley and propmptly, and bimble along merrily for 22 years, collect a pension and leave, or don't you like to see people with drive and ambition. I know who I would rarther have sat along side me in the flightdeck, and it wouldn't be the guy who thought he had an automatic right to be there just because he has had sunshine blown up his arse from cranwell

Andy20, good luck with your training mate, I am currently doing my ATPL theory with a view to leave the airforce in the next few years, don't let the attitude of some people hold you back. Remember it is easier to bring people down than climb above them
Kengineer-130 is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2006, 16:34
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Near a very good pub in rural Oxfordshire :-)
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Andy 20 - I saw your post on the professional flying training forum and was going to offer my one piece of advice there. However, the posts on this forum have shown one of the reasons for my advice, which is:

Keep your RAF career and your civil flying entirely separate, they really don't mix.

Have to say that, during my time in the RAF, any negative vibes tended to come from fellow engineers not the aircrew.
Snakecharmer is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2006, 23:22
  #23 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What was the point in that post? HOW IMATURE ARE YOU?! im suprised you could even get you ego into a cockpit! I am very committed to my job, and i dont intend to leave before my contract runs through? so where am i being a selfish idiot you fool? How can you even question my potential in my present job even though you do not even know anything about me and my job! Stop hassling people because you think you are above everyone else.

I know pilots within the RAF and everyone of them has been totally helpful! then i come on here to get some advice only to get wan kers like you posting crap when you dont even know me or my circumstances! i couldnt give a damn about a rank structure if you spoke to me in that manor to my face, id certainly tell you where to go!

Kengineer-130 and Snakecharmer the above is not relevance to you what so ever, cheers guys its people like you giving wannabes REAL advice that keeps people moving! You advice is much appreciated
Andy_20 is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2006, 02:23
  #24 (permalink)  
Nixor ut Ledo
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: In a Beaut of a State
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Andy20 I'll now leave banter aside and concentrate on the serious stuff. Having read the different posts and your reaction to them I would have to seriously question your suitability for an AT flight deck. You seem to have a remarkably short fuse which, I suspect, would not bode well in areas such as CRM or emergencies. Chill .....or you'll kill.
allan907 is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2006, 07:58
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: England
Posts: 964
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
KEngineer
Your post is UNNBeleeeivable!!
Tigs2 is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2006, 07:58
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This - received as a PM from our erstwhile wannabee - clearly backs up the comments made by Allan907 above!

Mods - please delete elements from the copied PM as you see fit! I will block our friend from future comms!

"Dick

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Your and idiot, how can you presume something about me when you know none of the circumstances! How come its dicks like you which have to try and look down on everyone else! You a jumped up little ****!"


Charming, eh?
AllTrimDoubt is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2006, 08:09
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: England
Posts: 964
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Andy
you are way out of order. Suggest if you are going to take a year out to improve yourself you start with doing GCSE English! Mods! As for sending PM's like that this guy should be banned IMHO.
Tigs2 is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2006, 08:18
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm telling on you!

Mummy! Mummy!

That boy called me a bad name.



So he has too short a fuse. So what.Grow up.

He was getting a lot of unjustified abuse about asking for something he is perfectly entitled to do. Taking a year out extends his commitment by one year, thus seing nobody off.
To impugn his skills in any department was unjustified without actually knowing him.
Good on him for having some ambition!
Tourist is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2006, 09:17
  #29 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TIGS2 what on earth are you talking about? why is KEngineer post unbelievable? why are you even posting in this question?

Allan907 sorry if i got the wrong end of the stick with you, im just sick of people looking down on people trying achieve something, the way i read your msg seemed degrading to wannabes and if this was not the case i apologise!

AllTrimDoubt, id appreciate it if you didnt post bk to a question to me as you only seem to be able to put people down and give bad advice seeing as you seem to be offended by people in the RAF 'playing the game'! Get a grip!

Tourist you are a legend! i dont see the harm in wanting to take a year out, if the RAF was against it why would they have it as an option to take!? or does the above think its just a right for aircrew? Its all about playing the game in the RAF, if you dont play then whats the point!?
Andy_20 is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2006, 09:45
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: England
Posts: 964
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Andy
I suggest if you want to use someone as a role model then it ought not to be Tourist. Calling someone a legend who lists their occupation as a Loafer and WAFU, well that says it all really. You get many differing points of view on this forum. You were the one who lowered the entire tone of this thread (your thread) by calling someone a knobber. What did you expect in return??
Tigs2 is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2006, 10:32
  #31 (permalink)  

Gentleman Aviator
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Teetering Towers - somewhere in the Shires
Age: 74
Posts: 3,700
Received 56 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by Tigs2
Calling someone a legend who lists their occupation as a Loafer and WAFU .....
... perhaps he meant leg end....
teeteringhead is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2006, 12:38
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Who pulled your chain Teeters?

"loafer" might be construed badly, I grant you, but the appelation WAFU makes me one of the proudest elite among flyers. The Naval Aviator.
Tourist is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2006, 13:23
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South of the Great Divide and West of the Greenwich Meridian
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Climebear
JSP 760 is available on the Intranet here - Chapter 18 for Career Brakes

[url="http://defenceintranet.diiweb.r.mil.uk/NR/rdonlyres/54B887FB-448D-4F1B-B67E-48021A03532E/0/20060126UJSP760V10.doc"]javascript:di_popup('/DefenceIntranet/Library/BrowseDocumentCategories/Personnel/WorkingHoursAndLeave/Leave/JointServicePublication760TriserviceRegulationsForLeaveAndOt herTypesOfAbsences.htm','DefenceIntranetBaseWindow');

The first para reads:
18. CAREER BREAKS


AIM

18.001 The aim of this Chapter is to set out the general terms and conditions under which the Armed Forces offer limited opportunities for Service personnel to take a Career Break (CB) where this does not compromise operational effectiveness. It is emphasised that CBs are granted at the absolute discretion of the Service; they are not a right and will only be permitted where manning margins allow and where they do not compromise operational capability. This means that inevitably some applications will be refused. Personnel on a CB will not be paid and will remain liable for recall to duty in the event of operational necessity. CBs may be for any period over 3 months and up to 3 years. Service personnel management authorities, however, may cap their duration at less than 3 years to minimise gapping and maintain operational capability. For the same reason it may be necessary to restrict the number of personnel on CBs at any one time.

Does this mean, under AFPS2005, an individual that joined at 17.5 could ask for up to 2 years off at .... mmm ... 52 years and still get 35/70ths at age 55? Okay no pay for 2 years but full pension and index linked instead of EDP.

Interested PAS
ChezTanker is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2006, 14:51
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: england
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Unbeliveable post Tig? please explain?......
Kengineer-130 is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2006, 16:08
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northumberland
Age: 65
Posts: 748
Received 6 Likes on 2 Posts
Andy.

I have 2 friends who were in the same job as me. Both were unhappy and one went from one disaster to the other. Both had aspirations to become Civil Pilots. Nobody thought they had the balls or the intelligence to succeed and they were treated as a bit of a sideshow. One is now a Captain on 747's (freight) and the other flies business jets for a charter firm. Both are a happy as pigs in sh*t.
I really admire both for having the guts to dump a comfy, well paid living and take a huge risk. I could not do it.
Good luck to you.
To those who are moaning about the year out. Blame the system, not the individual.
Wyler is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2006, 17:10
  #36 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks wyler, top story!
Andy_20 is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2006, 17:47
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Age: 84
Posts: 897
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
....and there I was thinking "PM" was an abbreviation for "Private Message"
I appreciate what it is you're trying to do Andy, but you sure have a short fuse!
Samuel is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2006, 17:58
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: England
Posts: 964
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tourist
OK i concede on the WAFU bit
Tigs2 is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2006, 22:08
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Andy - I think the thing to do is use your judgement and do what's best for yourself. Forget all the nonsense about 'the career' and over people covering for you. The people further up the ladder don't give two stuffs about guys like you - they want to keep good pensions and cave in to any demands for cuts . The RAF has been sold down the river by it's command and I should imagine there are plenty of people who used to enjoy the RAF when it embraced the value of it's people instead of the cost of them.
RileyDove is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2006, 22:25
  #40 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RileyDove great post, totally agree with you. i used to really enjoy the raf but its getting worse ran not like a military but more like a business, saving money and cutting corners everywhere to do it. The way i see RAF, if you play the game its not too bad!
Andy_20 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.