Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

More JSF problems

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

More JSF problems

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Feb 2006, 07:41
  #1 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,445
Received 1,602 Likes on 734 Posts
More JSF problems

US snubs Blair over Rolls-Royce engine deal

Tony Blair's credibility was dealt a fresh blow last night after the Prime Minster failed to persuade President Bush to award a crucial engine contract for the world's most expensive warplane to Rolls-Royce. Despite intense lobbying from Downing Street, the US Government excluded Rolls-Royce's $2.4bn (£1.36bn) contract to develop an alternative engine for America's Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) from its latest defence budget.

Rolls-Royce refused to comment on reports that 340 workers will be redeployed or made redundant as a result of the decision. Half the jobs involved are in Indianapolis, with the rest at the group's Bristol plant.In a statement it said it was "very disappointed" but that it would try to revive support for the plans in the Congressional debate on the budget.

"The programme marked an important step forward for collaboration between the US and the UK defence sectors, beside the far-reaching benefits of having competing engines on the JSF," it said. "The financial impact, if we do not succeed in reinstating it, will be spread over many years into the future. It is also perhaps worth noting that we will still be expecting significant revenues from the JSF programme." Rolls-Royce is expected to comment further at its preliminary results on Thursday.

Britain is contributing $2 billion to the £150 billion JSF project, which also involves BAE Systems.

CBI director-general Sir Digby Jones attacked America's decision as "short-term cost-cutting" which sent out "all the wrong signals" about America's attitude to collaboration on aerospace and defence projects. He added: "That's not a great message to send to your most loyal international business partner and best friend in an uncertain world. I thought better of America's attitude to the UK.".................
ORAC is online now  
Old 14th Feb 2006, 18:30
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
890 views and only one reply?

That would definitely be a special relationship alright...

Reuters
WG774 is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2006, 22:02
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Devon
Posts: 2,812
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
Blair isn't very good at getting good deals for the UK, is he?
WE Branch Fanatic is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.