Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

100th British Fatality

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

100th British Fatality

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Jan 2006, 23:08
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: England
Posts: 964
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is tragic news but please remember all of those who do not make the news! During the first three months of Op Telic alone there were 1450 casualties brought back to the uk Some of them were severly injured and we never hear about them in the news. I guess by now it is several thousand wounded.
Tigs2 is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2006, 10:44
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Royal Berkshire
Posts: 1,746
Received 79 Likes on 41 Posts
Originally Posted by Tigs2
This is tragic news but please remember all of those who do not make the news! During the first three months of Op Telic alone there were 1450 casualties brought back to the uk Some of them were severly injured and we never hear about them in the news. I guess by now it is several thousand wounded.
Funny you should say that, there was something on the TV news the other day about the MOD being reluctant to issue offcial numbers of wounded (unlike the USA)
Reid/MOD was cornered about it and came up with an official number being 230 odd, with about 4,000 being the offical number of repariations back to UK for medical treatment.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4632394.stm
GeeRam is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2006, 17:04
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Wiltshire
Age: 59
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Reid/MOD was cornered about it and came up with an official number being 230 odd
That figure seems very low....

Using the US figures of 2,243 killed and 16,420 wounded or.... 1 killed for every 7 wounded the British figure would be in the region of 700 wounded.

I know that this is a very crude way of looking at the stats but I find it hard to believe that there is such a difference between the ratios of wounded to killed between the US and UK troops.
November4 is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2006, 15:11
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Trumpville; On the edge
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well said, Sir! (Read the last line in the link)

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article...020989,00.html
Trumpet_trousers is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.