Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Red Arrows to be renamed the Blue Bows

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Red Arrows to be renamed the Blue Bows

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Jan 2006, 10:25
  #41 (permalink)  

Gentleman Aviator
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Teetering Towers - somewhere in the Shires
Age: 74
Posts: 3,700
Received 55 Likes on 26 Posts
It was hardly her choice to wear the red suit - it's what she was told to do by "the system" aka some very senior, bewinged officers .....

... and as it happens, she was so good at the job that she was extended because no-one of suitable calibre could be found at her normal tourex..

.."I did wear one for 3 years and on the whole enjoyed it, but I am now on a very very long ground tour.....
"
....

.... ahhhh! chopped at the OCU then were we? that explains it......
teeteringhead is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2006, 10:43
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 1,077
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
Absolutely, yes I was chopped on the last trip of my OCF and subsequently thrown out of the branch. I won't deny it. And one day, my old deskie will get the favour returned in some way or another.....

However, I stand by what I said about certain ground pers longing to look like pilots. I can understand it: it's very comfortable bar-wear.

And no matter whose decision it was, Air-rank or Sqn boss, it still looks odd.

I would extend the same judgement to a certain F3 SqintO out there who wears a growbag - you know who you are!
Training Risky is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2006, 10:48
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 1,077
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
Actually to reattack this, the same can be said of certain Stn Cdrs, OC Ops, SLOps and AWC instructors who would all have to enter the CERN particle accelerator to be separated from their 'safety equipment' as they are obviously attached at the sub-nuclear level. It amuses the students no end...!
Training Risky is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2006, 10:50
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,447
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So let me get this right. You are slating someone you have never met over what she wears to work which is mandated by those in higher authority to herself? You need to get out more - you're starting to sound bitter.
Megaton is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2006, 10:56
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Near the coast
Posts: 2,373
Received 565 Likes on 158 Posts
Training Risky

People in glass houses and all that!
You seem to have a real bee in your bonnet about this and yet your profile clearly states a few mistruths. You say you are an RAF pilot who flies/flew Chinooks. Not strictly true if we're going to be honest!
Time to accept your new position in life and get on with it!
BV
Bob Viking is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2006, 10:59
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Lincs
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TR,
'fraid you've lost it old boy!
I was pretty much with you (almost) until that last post, and then you went 'round the corner, looking like a Richard Head

Lets face it, if you had NOT got chopped, then you too would have worn a grow bag at every opportune moment - just like the rest of us do (or did in my case)

I know the said young lady, and I think your comments are out of order - if here Boss says wear it, then wear it she will (and so should she!)

If you have a problem with that, I can only suggest you take yourself off the palace where her Boss lives and tell him. You can't miss it, its a big place in London with flags flying outside!

Now if you want to bring your argumant back into line, and start on about movers, stackers et al wearing flying suits then I'll be back with you, but don't pick on someone who is, frankly, only doing as she is told.

Kind regards
TSM
The Swinging Monkey is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2006, 11:09
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: wiltshire
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is spelling not on the menu at IOT any more?
Correct about training risky though - bitter bloke from the sound of it
Lara crofts pants is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2006, 11:10
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: At piece.
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TR -

"Absolutely, yes I was chopped on the last trip of my OCF and subsequently thrown out of the branch. I won't deny it. And one day, my old deskie will get the favour returned in some way or another....."

Definitely the one to blame - make sure you stick it to them good and proper .
OCCWMF is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2006, 11:13
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Here to Eternity
Age: 39
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is spelling not on the menu at IOT any more?
Neither is grammar, by the look of it, Lara Croft's [sic x2] pants.... </pedant>
Dimensional is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2006, 12:58
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: wiltshire
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A bite. Lovely
Lara crofts pants is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2006, 14:21
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 1,077
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
WOOO HOOO... cat, pigeons, GO!

Points to ponder for everyone (In order):

I was not the one who brought said Sqn Ldr into the original discussion, I was merely stating my opinion, in a humourous way, of ground pers who wear growbags (regardless of their choice in the matter). So in this case, not really slating the wearer, but the policy and the said apparel.

And yes I may sound a little bitter, but so are a few other chopped RW pilots who lost their cushy ME careers in the heady days of the post-911 chopfest. I will have to pay for my own doughnuts and ATPL now.

I haven't looked at my profile since 2002, sorry if its not 100% correct, I may get around to changing it one day. (In fact, I've just done it.) Am now heartily 'getting on' with my position as Untermensch.

I certainly would wear a growbag 24/7, if I was still flying. The fact that I don't means that I avoid looking like a aircrew groupie

On the subject of bitterness, if anyone else decides to use the Data Protection Act to read e-mails exchanged between deskies about YOU, then you might appreciate what I am talking about.

----------

I never intended to drag this thread into a slanging match, so feel free to talk about the Blue Bows, or alternatively (if you lack any sense of humour) continue to snipe at BEagle for his banter....
Training Risky is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2006, 09:29
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hemel Hempstead
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Back when I was a lad, and learning to fly, it was drummed in to us that wearing flying kit in the mess was not officer like. Very non u and so on. Officers were supposed to look like officers at all times. Now this was a long time ago, but I still hold to what I was taught then. Aircrew in the mess should look like the officers they claim to be, and not wear their work clothes. And that applies to all those slobs who wear scruffy jeans trainers and tee ****s around the mess. If they want to look like juniors, they should have joined in the ranks.
As for the wannabe's and the oncewas's; ground crew people wearing aircrew clothing just look silly and loose all their street cred. Their airmen laugh at them behind their backs, and that is not the way to lead.
RayDarr is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2006, 11:02
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: At piece.
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Snipe withdrawn!
OCCWMF is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.