St Athan and the £100m White Elephant
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Pianosa
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
St Athan and the £100m White Elephant
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/wales/4621566.stm
Have already made my views clear on other threads about the f
wits at DARA, the WDA etc. who thought that this enterprise could compete with the private sector and/or deliver a service that could meet even the most rudimentary of requirements.
As prophesised by my good self some weeks ago, it would appear that 1 PARA and the Welsh Guards will soon have a cracking MT shed.
Have already made my views clear on other threads about the f
wits at DARA, the WDA etc. who thought that this enterprise could compete with the private sector and/or deliver a service that could meet even the most rudimentary of requirements.As prophesised by my good self some weeks ago, it would appear that 1 PARA and the Welsh Guards will soon have a cracking MT shed.
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Under a Log
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Full report should be here:
http://www.publications.parliament.u.../557/55702.htm
But from the Summary.
"The future of DARA is uncertain: some of its businesses are to be closed down; others are to be market tested. The prospects for the DARA St Athan site, including its recently completed Superhangar facility costing over £100m, are in particular doubt. Seen with the benefit of hindsight, MoD's decision to go ahead with building the Superhangar at DARA St Athan at a time when it was reviewing its logistic support provision was incomprehensible and we recommend an investigation by the National Audit Office and the Wales Audit Office. It was also a clear example of a lack of joined-up Government. But now that the Superhangar with its impressive state-of-the-art facilities has been built, it is vital that MoD works with other government bodies to attract commercial investment there."
http://www.publications.parliament.u.../557/55702.htm
But from the Summary.
"The future of DARA is uncertain: some of its businesses are to be closed down; others are to be market tested. The prospects for the DARA St Athan site, including its recently completed Superhangar facility costing over £100m, are in particular doubt. Seen with the benefit of hindsight, MoD's decision to go ahead with building the Superhangar at DARA St Athan at a time when it was reviewing its logistic support provision was incomprehensible and we recommend an investigation by the National Audit Office and the Wales Audit Office. It was also a clear example of a lack of joined-up Government. But now that the Superhangar with its impressive state-of-the-art facilities has been built, it is vital that MoD works with other government bodies to attract commercial investment there."
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Pianosa
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This might have been better suited for the spanner-monkey's forum, but as many who worked there said at the time that DARA was established- and the head shed started all the pie-in-the-sky talk of attracting commercial customers like it was the easiest thing in the world- where is the surplus of demand in the UK or European aerospace industry for another such facility?
All the current companies and organisations in the marketplace seem to be doing rather well as is, without the need to buy a super-duper, nearly-new building. Or will the involvment of "other government bodies" be a euphamism for even more tax payers money being thrown at the problem?
All the current companies and organisations in the marketplace seem to be doing rather well as is, without the need to buy a super-duper, nearly-new building. Or will the involvment of "other government bodies" be a euphamism for even more tax payers money being thrown at the problem?
Last edited by Washington_Irving; 18th Jan 2006 at 10:12.
The WDA (I think they're gone now) have a spectacular record for giving foreign companies huge wads of cash 'for bringing the jobs in'; and not quite being able to notice that the factories shut down when the grants end.
The (usually Jap) company then buggers off to Malaysia or some such place.
Quite how they even thought that giving the dosh to DARA was going to pay off, I'll never know.
CG
The (usually Jap) company then buggers off to Malaysia or some such place.
Quite how they even thought that giving the dosh to DARA was going to pay off, I'll never know.
CG
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Pianosa
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by charliegolf
The WDA (I think they're gone now) have a spectacular record for giving foreign companies huge wads of cash 'for bringing the jobs in'; and not quite being able to notice that the factories shut down when the grants end.
The (usually Jap) company then buggers off to Malaysia or some such place.
Quite how they even thought that giving the dosh to DARA was going to pay off, I'll never know.
CG
The (usually Jap) company then buggers off to Malaysia or some such place.
Quite how they even thought that giving the dosh to DARA was going to pay off, I'll never know.
CG
Everything will be alright now, I'm sure, since the WDA has been abolished and its duties have been assumed by the ever-capable Welsh Assembly.
As of December last, the future of DARA is not uncertain. They know what will happen to St Athan, what work Fleetlands will be left with, which MoD agency will take back Sealand and who will buy Almondbank. The last lot are chuffed to bits, but then they always were the crown jewels of DARA/NARO in terms of efficiency and already having a huge percentage of work from the commercial sector. They learned to cope decades ago with what is happening now to the other three.
Washington,
You get the prize for world's best euphemism.
You used
"the ever-capable Welsh Assembly"
for
"pointless, money grabbing waste of skins", the usual view around where I live.
Spot on mate.
CG
You get the prize for world's best euphemism.
You used
"the ever-capable Welsh Assembly"
for
"pointless, money grabbing waste of skins", the usual view around where I live.
Spot on mate.
CG
Gentleman Aviator
Tell me Washington, are these fwits at DARA the same ones that, according to Hansard (if I can be @rsed I'll find a reference), used to turn round Harrier servicings in almost exactly half the time that Cottesmore currently manages???
Quite simply IMHO someone had it in for DARA; just think:
Build mega-million squid hangar then "roll forward" takes all work away from it - therefore no work so close DARA fixed wing and flog off the VC 10 work.
"Roll back" helicopter work to DARA Fleetlands - therefore "bloody 'ell, they've got lotsa work - best close 'em and flog off the rotary work..."
Do I detect a scintilla of less-than-consistent policy here??
ISTM that in MoD the right hand doesn't know what the right hand's doing......
wits at DARA the same ones that, according to Hansard (if I can be @rsed I'll find a reference), used to turn round Harrier servicings in almost exactly half the time that Cottesmore currently manages???Quite simply IMHO someone had it in for DARA; just think:
Build mega-million squid hangar then "roll forward" takes all work away from it - therefore no work so close DARA fixed wing and flog off the VC 10 work.
"Roll back" helicopter work to DARA Fleetlands - therefore "bloody 'ell, they've got lotsa work - best close 'em and flog off the rotary work..."
Do I detect a scintilla of less-than-consistent policy here??
ISTM that in MoD the right hand doesn't know what the right hand's doing......
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Pianosa
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not knocking work of the chaps and chappesses on the factory floor. Everyone I know saw this coming from a mile away when DARA was first established.
It was everyone's sense from the get-go that the DARA head shed never wanted to be at St Athan, didn't want St Athan as part of the system despite it being the (biggest aircraft engineering facility in the MoD) and, perhaps more importantly, the gaggle of retired Wg Cdrs and Gp Capts they put in charge didn't have a Scooby Doo about how to run the place as a business.
It was everyone's sense from the get-go that the DARA head shed never wanted to be at St Athan, didn't want St Athan as part of the system despite it being the (biggest aircraft engineering facility in the MoD) and, perhaps more importantly, the gaggle of retired Wg Cdrs and Gp Capts they put in charge didn't have a Scooby Doo about how to run the place as a business.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Under The Sea
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
teeteringhead
I think there are two issues with your arguement about turning aircraft around.
1. Why pay a civilian workforce when you already have a military workforce that can do the job (and you need to keep that military workforce occupied in case of crisis)?
2. Turnaround time is not everything if the flow is constant and the aircraft are come out of servicing in the correct mod state and to an agreed standard?
However, I do agree that the treatment of the workforce is appauling.
I think there are two issues with your arguement about turning aircraft around.
1. Why pay a civilian workforce when you already have a military workforce that can do the job (and you need to keep that military workforce occupied in case of crisis)?
2. Turnaround time is not everything if the flow is constant and the aircraft are come out of servicing in the correct mod state and to an agreed standard?
However, I do agree that the treatment of the workforce is appauling.
1. Why pay a civilian workforce when you already have a military workforce that can do the job (and you need to keep that military workforce occupied in case of crisis)?
Knowing the skills required at Depths C and D, I can assure you that rolling forward to 2nd line where the work will be carried out by technicians more used to Depths A and B will, at the very least, create a void. Many are the tales of boxes of bits from attempted / botched repairs appearing at DARA workshops.
2. Turnaround time is not everything if the flow is constant and the aircraft are come out of servicing in the correct mod state and to an agreed standard?
If the MoD provided funding to keep documentation at the correct mod state (correct up-to-date documentation being part of the audit trail to ensure serviceability and safety – and we have seen from the Mull thread that neither are high on the MoD’s list of priorities) and had any interest at all in agreeing and adhering to standards, then I’d agree with you. As they don’t, I’m afraid the argument doesn’t stand up. I wish it did.
However, I do agree that the treatment of the workforce is appalling. Agreed!
Buy shares in whoever buys DARA. Given a modicum of commercial acumen together with detailed knowledge of the above, they’ll take MoD to the cleaners.
Knowing the skills required at Depths C and D, I can assure you that rolling forward to 2nd line where the work will be carried out by technicians more used to Depths A and B will, at the very least, create a void. Many are the tales of boxes of bits from attempted / botched repairs appearing at DARA workshops.
2. Turnaround time is not everything if the flow is constant and the aircraft are come out of servicing in the correct mod state and to an agreed standard?
If the MoD provided funding to keep documentation at the correct mod state (correct up-to-date documentation being part of the audit trail to ensure serviceability and safety – and we have seen from the Mull thread that neither are high on the MoD’s list of priorities) and had any interest at all in agreeing and adhering to standards, then I’d agree with you. As they don’t, I’m afraid the argument doesn’t stand up. I wish it did.
However, I do agree that the treatment of the workforce is appalling. Agreed!
Buy shares in whoever buys DARA. Given a modicum of commercial acumen together with detailed knowledge of the above, they’ll take MoD to the cleaners.
Registered User **
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
DM
10 or 15 years ago this might have been the case, but not anymore.
The world of lean is seeing to that !
Safety_helmut
1. Why pay a civilian workforce when you already have a military workforce that can do the job (and you need to keep that military workforce occupied in case of crisis)?
The world of lean is seeing to that !
Safety_helmut
Gentleman Aviator
I'm pleased that all seem to agree that:
a. The spanner-turners were never the problem.
b. They've been treated very badly.
Washington Irving
you may well be right about management errors, but (as I've mentioned before on these fora) you can't blame "retired wg cdrs and gp capts" as the last of these aged engineers (and the odd air commode!) left DARA more than 2 years ago, before the "End-to-End" study was finished. Perhaps you have emulated your most famous literary creation and have been asleep for a few years??
I still believe there was an element of "situating the appreciation" when you consider the disparity of treatment as between St Athan and Fleetlands... maybe votes at Gosport are more valuable than votes in Wales!
My engineer mates tell me the "Super Hangar" is an engineer's dream .... significantly, I know of a very senior RAF engineer who was invited by an old mate to view the facilities (informally - as an old mate). He was put under pressure by men with more stars than he NOT to visit ........
Cynical? Moi?
a. The spanner-turners were never the problem.
b. They've been treated very badly.
Washington Irving
you may well be right about management errors, but (as I've mentioned before on these fora) you can't blame "retired wg cdrs and gp capts" as the last of these aged engineers (and the odd air commode!) left DARA more than 2 years ago, before the "End-to-End" study was finished. Perhaps you have emulated your most famous literary creation and have been asleep for a few years??
I still believe there was an element of "situating the appreciation" when you consider the disparity of treatment as between St Athan and Fleetlands... maybe votes at Gosport are more valuable than votes in Wales!
My engineer mates tell me the "Super Hangar" is an engineer's dream .... significantly, I know of a very senior RAF engineer who was invited by an old mate to view the facilities (informally - as an old mate). He was put under pressure by men with more stars than he NOT to visit ........
Cynical? Moi?
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Pianosa
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Grew up near there, but only make it back a couple of times a year- all v. hard to keep up with the inside scoop. The last of my service mates left the RAFSU about 18 months ago but an ex-DARA PR bod is a mate of mine from school days and he decided to Foxtrot Oscar a couple of weeks before they had to announce that the Tornado work was going to Marham. When the spin-meisters are jumping ship, you know that the writing's on the wall.
Having said all that, and I accept your point fully, the old SEngO club that got the ball rolling helped to set the standards and the precedents for everything that followed.
All v. sad. In April my hometown will be over-run by 1PARA.
Edited to add that the Vale of Glamorgan is a very marginal seat. It's currently held by John Smith (Lab)- an ex SNCO of all things and a complete oxygen thief who is as much use as tits on a fish.
Having said all that, and I accept your point fully, the old SEngO club that got the ball rolling helped to set the standards and the precedents for everything that followed.
All v. sad. In April my hometown will be over-run by 1PARA.
Edited to add that the Vale of Glamorgan is a very marginal seat. It's currently held by John Smith (Lab)- an ex SNCO of all things and a complete oxygen thief who is as much use as tits on a fish.
Probably like the excellent hangars with built in centralised services, ample heating and lighting which were the answers to a SEngO's dream at a certain RAF aerodrome. No houchins clattering away, leaking hydraulic rigs, cold and draft - the lads thought all their Christmasses had come at once.
A fine station indeed; many would say the best in the RAF of the 1980s.
That was RAF Chivenor, aka 'Heaven in Devon'. So they closed it and gave it to the Royal Machines...
A fine station indeed; many would say the best in the RAF of the 1980s.
That was RAF Chivenor, aka 'Heaven in Devon'. So they closed it and gave it to the Royal Machines...
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Here and there
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Now, there's a very good reason for all of this. And for those of you who don't have the pleasure of dining with DCinC STC very often, let me explain:
The RAF has a Strategic Vision right? This is a forecast of what's to come in 20 years time and so that's what we have to start being like now, OK?
The Strategic Vision takes about 5 years to instigate. Comprendez?
But they invent a new Strategic Vision every 4 years. So that's why the old one is no good. Simple.
When DCinC told me this story, he used a few longer, more complicated words. But that's roughly it.
The RAF has a Strategic Vision right? This is a forecast of what's to come in 20 years time and so that's what we have to start being like now, OK?
The Strategic Vision takes about 5 years to instigate. Comprendez?
But they invent a new Strategic Vision every 4 years. So that's why the old one is no good. Simple.
When DCinC told me this story, he used a few longer, more complicated words. But that's roughly it.
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Britain
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by tucumseh
Many are the tales of boxes of bits from attempted / botched repairs appearing at DARA workshops.
Apologies if that sounds like mud-slinging, but let's not put on our rose tinted specs here. That said, I feel for the poor guys whose jobs are on the line / gone, especially when there's precious little aircraft work about, and a whole load of ex-mob redundees looking for it too!
Tonka
Attempting to, and failing, to conduct a level of repair that you are not cleared to do – thereby compromising safety and risking loss of the asset - is not quite the same as finding faults on acceptance from an authorised repairer; but your point is taken.
I agree with your sentiments about the workforce, many of whom will in the past have uprooted and moved to, for example, St Athan. I do indeed think fondly of these workshops, but then in blacker moments remember more recent times when they were run by some real non-entities. I’ve said this before – I’ll never forget the idiot at Fleetlands who declined a huge amount of work, declaring “We do not regard MoD(PE) as a customer”. Perhaps with better leadership they wouldn’t be in this situation, although the politics would probably win out in the end either way.
Attempting to, and failing, to conduct a level of repair that you are not cleared to do – thereby compromising safety and risking loss of the asset - is not quite the same as finding faults on acceptance from an authorised repairer; but your point is taken.
I agree with your sentiments about the workforce, many of whom will in the past have uprooted and moved to, for example, St Athan. I do indeed think fondly of these workshops, but then in blacker moments remember more recent times when they were run by some real non-entities. I’ve said this before – I’ll never forget the idiot at Fleetlands who declined a huge amount of work, declaring “We do not regard MoD(PE) as a customer”. Perhaps with better leadership they wouldn’t be in this situation, although the politics would probably win out in the end either way.