Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Reds moving to Leeming?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Reds moving to Leeming?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Dec 2005, 18:52
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tim - the suggestion of an operating museum came from my notion of moving the BBMF to Scampton and the Reds moving to Conningsby. There are a number of historic buildings that could be put to good use in telling some of the history of Bomber Command and Guy Gibson. Scampton in itself is possibly the most historic bomber airfield in the world and the BBMF Lancaster could quite easily be the best known bomber in the world.
The BBMF is always going to be a unit that is scrutinised by the bean counters and if there was a way it could operate from an airfield like Scampton it would be far easier to introduce commercial elements to help fund the Flight without using involving the public purse.
A move to Conningsby by the Reds would also allow the public access that is currently required for the BBMF to be reduced a what seems increasingly to be the U.K's main air defence base.
The Reds would then still be within sensible commuting distance of most U.K air displays.
The notion of moving to Leeming doesn't fit within the sensible distances required to attend to display appearances.
Far more sensible to do the above and then move 100 Squadron
into Scampton to utilise some of Scampton's space - provide a source of aircrew for the BBMF and also bring the target facilities
aircraft closer to the Typhoons.
None of this is in the media and entirely hypothetical Tim .
RileyDove is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2005, 19:01
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: England
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Coningsby Coningsby Coningsby
Brain Potter is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2005, 20:03
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Reds need a clearly defined practice area that is clear of homes, roads, etc - there are only a handful of bases that fulfill that criteria, and Coningsby isn't one of them. Neither is Leeming - the only base other than Scampers is Marham, I believe. Sadly Coltishall didn't meet the criteria, either.
f4aviation is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2005, 22:38
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What Leeming right beside the North York Moors, the Yorkshire Dales, the Durham Dales, the Lake District etc etc

Too many houses around there

You could stick them at St Athan, plenty of facilities there and they have the whole of Wales to train over.
Styron is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2005, 07:19
  #65 (permalink)  

Gentleman Aviator
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Teetering Towers - somewhere in the Shires
Age: 74
Posts: 3,698
Received 51 Likes on 24 Posts
You could stick them at St Athan
...mmmm ... on an airfield that lies entirely within the Class D airspace of an international airport which is less than 3 nm away at its closest - oh and with runways very much not parallel (40 degrees apart) ....

.... Ok maybe not ......
teeteringhead is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2005, 12:17
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And Leemings not, it's only five miles from Teesside Airport.

I didn't realise the RAF were so picky about airports as there are constant near misses documented around Newcastle Airport.

Time for the RAF to stop it's low flying over the north, now that Boulmer is going and followed by Leeming, yes.

They can go and practice over there new home in Scotland.
Styron is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2005, 12:58
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Near the coast
Posts: 2,371
Received 553 Likes on 151 Posts
Styron

I could be wrong, but you appear to be a very small and bitter man. With a rather well developed inferiority complex.
Or perhaps your comments are just a very poor attempt at fishing for a few bites.
BV
Bob Viking is online now  
Old 2nd Dec 2005, 14:49
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@ Bob,

you are what you drink Bob and I am from the north and a bitter man

The RAF only ever drink halves of shandy, so there not welcome in the north.

In fact the only time the RAF come up north now is to attend Manchesters Gay Pride Festival.

Last edited by Styron; 2nd Dec 2005 at 15:00.
Styron is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2005, 14:58
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Royal Berkshire
Posts: 1,738
Received 77 Likes on 39 Posts
Further fuelling the Scampton flying museum thingy....weren't there rumours that the Vulcan would be operated out of Scampton rather than Brunters?
If they ever succeed in getting the money together to get it in the air of course
GeeRam is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2005, 15:38
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,821
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
And have you given any financial donation to help put the Vulcan up where it belongs, GeeRam?

558 will fly from Bruntingthorpe. Not Sunny Scampton.
BEagle is online now  
Old 2nd Dec 2005, 16:51
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Down the field!
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BEagle - what makes you so sure that 558 will fly from Bruntingthorpe rather than Scampton? GeeRam is right... there are a lot of rumours at Scampton that 558 will be spending her flying days here... I thought it was something to do with Bruntingthorpe not being able to provide the fire cover required by the CAA? - Or have you heard something to the contrary?
Grob Driver is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2005, 21:18
  #72 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is always Kemble
BOAC is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2005, 07:21
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Royal Berkshire
Posts: 1,738
Received 77 Likes on 39 Posts
And have you given any financial donation to help put the Vulcan up where it belongs, GeeRam?
Nope.

What little I can spare goes to the LPG at Brunters to aid the reconstruction of the old Wattisham QRA shed.
They are desperate to raise just a mere fraction of '558's funding to get the two F.6's under cover and create a 'working' Lightning museum.
GeeRam is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2005, 08:00
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Used to be God's own County
Posts: 1,719
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Am I assuming that the Reds would still require to practice over their home base (assuming beancounters would not tolerate any transit)
.....just to re-iterate, as it's probably been mentioned before....
9500'msl avoid adjacent to an estblished and 'growing' civvy airport - no problems there then

To forward the debate of Southern Shandy Drinkers (SSD)
I concur with the aforementioned comments of our Northern compatriot.
EESDL is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2005, 21:37
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not heard any concrete news about 558 being based anywhere other than Bruntingthorpe, but I suppose it could be true. The Vulcan's designated driver lives over just past Metheringham so I guess he'd rather drive back up to Scampton (where he used to be based too)!

If any of you fellas have any unusual Vulcan photos floating around, do let me know - I've just started work on my second Vulcan book and this one is going to be a seriously large volume!
Tim McLelland is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.