Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Toothless Poodle

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Toothless Poodle

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Nov 2005, 06:44
  #101 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: London
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A Regiment of Royal Machines knocked over Persia in the last big one!
4Greens is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2005, 01:30
  #102 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Still all quiet on the "When are you going to do something about this?" front, as per the start of this thread. I know that Tony is currently very busy sorting out his place in the history books and covering up the true extent of Mrs Bliar's book/lecture tour earnings from revealing details of life at No 10 with the Dear Leader, but surely the following should get even a toothless poodle yapping again?

BBC News 16 November 2005

Iran 'resumes uranium processing'

Diplomats said the move would hamper efforts to restart talks


Iran has begun to process a new batch of uranium to convert it to a gas (uranium hexafluoride - UF6) that can be enriched into the material for nuclear bombs, diplomats say. "Conversion has resumed," a diplomat close to the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna said.

The move comes despite heavy pressure from the US and Europe for Iran to cease all nuclear activity.

Iran denies Western claims that it has a secret nuclear weapons programme, saying it just wants nuclear power.

Uranium enriched to a low level is used to produce nuclear fuel, while further enrichment (production of UF6) makes it suitable for use in atomic weapons. Diplomats told the BBC that IAEA inspectors had witnessed the new round of uranium conversion at Iran's facility in Isfahan.

Another said the move would hamper efforts to restart negotiations between Europe and Iran over its nuclear programme.

"It's not good news, no, not at all. Because people were trying to arrange for new talks and now it's more difficult," said a senior European diplomat quoted by the AFP news agency.

Diplomats told AFP that after this round of conversion Iran might have enough UF6 to make 10 bombs.
highcirrus is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2005, 19:26
  #103 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hove
Age: 72
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Diplomats told the BBC that IAEA inspectors had witnessed the new round of uranium conversion at Iran's facility in Isfahan."

"Diplomats told AFP that after this round of conversion Iran might have enough UF6 to make 10 bombs."

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Normally these idiots will only let you know whats good for them, rather than whats good for us.
clicker is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2005, 04:29
  #104 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A great Rational for War!

Peter Oborne – Observer/Spectator/Express etc

New and shocking (as revealed in the memoirs of former UK ambassador in Washington, Sir Christopher Meyer) is the sheer genuflection (of PM Blair) before President Bush. The thought never seems to cross Tony Blair’s mind that the United Kingdom is an independent state, with discrete interests and values of our own. The British Prime Minister’s parting instruction to (Ambassador) Meyer, issued through Chief of Staff Jonathon Powell, was wretched: “Get up the arse of the White House and stay there”.

Further:

One major reason for the fiasco of the Iraq invasion (writes Meyer) was the failure to plan for the aftermath of victory. Britain was the only ally of the United States which could have remedied this omission. Thanks to what can only be regarded as negligence by the Prime Minister, we failed to do so. “Had Britain so insisted”, says Meyer in a deadly comment, “Iraq after Saddam might have avoided the violence that may yet prove fatal to the entire enterprise”.

Reassuring to be under such reliable and competent leadership!
Anotherpost75 is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2005, 08:02
  #105 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Lindum
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And the alternative is?.....
DuaneDibley is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2005, 14:59
  #106 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: berlin
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey Duane, you been living under a rock for the past couple of months?
jstars2 is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2005, 15:33
  #107 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Lindum
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

J2

More like a bridge actually......
DuaneDibley is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2005, 19:03
  #108 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London/Oxford/New York
Posts: 2,926
Received 139 Likes on 64 Posts
"Britain was the only ally of the United States which could have
remedied this omission"


???????????????????????????????????

Why? How?

What magic powers does the UK possess that could have stopped the nonsense going on over there, surely the problem exists BECAUSE we invaded them in the first place?
pr00ne is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.