Improving flight safety in the future
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: On the outside looking in
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
tuc,
Unfortunately, no. Said person was an engineer who just felt it 'career limiting' to be seen as the one who's system wasn't going to be 'ready' in time if the safety issues raised were to be effectively addressed.
As for IPT's having to justify why the haven't nb'd the advice from BD, the safety case presented up the line should cover areas where the IPT is taking responsibility for the risk in not implementing recommendations.
But therein lies more cans.
sw
And I know quite a few non-engineer IPTLs and project managers who resent the fact that their junior staffs actually have more responsibility and authority than they do. These, I suspect, are the people Safeware was referring to.
As for IPT's having to justify why the haven't nb'd the advice from BD, the safety case presented up the line should cover areas where the IPT is taking responsibility for the risk in not implementing recommendations.
But therein lies more cans.
sw
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Half Way Up The Stairs
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
tucumseh,
But given that IPTs are to be deciders, not providers, surel the rationale for ignoring each piece of advice would be as detailed as the advice itself, thereby perpetuating the paperwork mountain?
5206
a PM who ignores the recommendations MUST give written reasons
5206
