Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Fighter jets and Hurricane Katrina

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Fighter jets and Hurricane Katrina

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Sep 2005, 22:21
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 33,000'
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fighter jets and Hurricane Katrina

Hi All,

Caught the last part of a CNN report the other day about the US sending fighter jets to fly through (above?) the hurricane to try and dissipate the force, how does this work? Or did I misinterpret?

worst-class is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2005, 22:52
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Victoria
Age: 62
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Riiiiiiiiight!!
Captain Sand Dune is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2005, 23:06
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: EGPF
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The US have some specially adapted Herc's that are used as Hurricane hunters - it is their job to fly into and through the eye of the storm, in an effort to gather as much scientific data as they can on Hurricanes. This might have been what you saw - when I was in Florida last year, there was a lot of coverage of the Hurricane hunters on TV and the missions they flew.
Mark McG is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2005, 03:35
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 1,393
Received 20 Likes on 6 Posts
NOAA HURRICANE HUNTER PILOT CAPTURES KATRINA AT HER MEANEST

Sept. 1, 2005 - NOAA hurricane hunter WP-3D Orion and Gulfstream IV aircraft conducted ten long flights into and around the eye of Hurricane Katrina. Lt. Mike Silah, a P-3 pilot, got to see Hurricane Katrina up close and personal, especially when she was an extremely dangerous Category Five storm in the Gulf of Mexico. The day before the powerful and destructive storm made landfall on the USA Gulf Coast, Silah snapped a series of images capturing the eyewall of Katrina.

Silah is a NOAA Corps officer based at the NOAA Aircraft Operations Center in Tampa, Fla.

View the pics at http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2005/s2496.htm
Fris B. Fairing is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2005, 04:54
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: At work
Posts: 293
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does anyone know what the tops of the associated cloud are? ie the altitude/flight level.
belowMDA is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2005, 07:08
  #6 (permalink)  
Dr Dave
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
For info, the amount of energy released through cloud/rain formation in an average hurricane (which is much smaller than Katrina) is estimated to be 5.2 x 10^19 Joules/day or 6.0 x 10^14 Watts.

This is equivalent to 200 times the world-wide electrical generating capacity. There is no way that flying a fighter jet through would have much effect.
 
Old 5th Sep 2005, 07:11
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Europe-the sunshine side
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hats off for those pilots,you have to be a bit crazy to do that ,I guess.There should be some CB's and heavy turbulance ,there ,IMHO
Great pictures,viewed from home
any first hand experience of flying through this kind of storm?
alexban is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2005, 09:31
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: singapore
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it's gonna take a whole more guts than a typical airline pilot has...
babyboeing400 is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2005, 05:17
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are those aircraft reinforced in any way? I just can't comprehend how they don't get smashed up into tiny little bits and strewn all over the country side...
Whiskey226 is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2005, 07:39
  #10 (permalink)  
The Cooler King
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: In the Desert
Posts: 1,703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'll bet you that "Airwolf" could have stopped it, cos it's got like special rotor blades and stuff.
Farrell is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2005, 12:39
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Migratory bird
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Blue Thunder" was always more of a man's helo than "Airwolf"...

As for airline pilots, most of the ones I know have a lot of gut...
DeBurcs is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2005, 18:56
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Wales
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No way, Airwolf is much Harder!!!!


I suggest a poll!!!
Turn It Off is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2005, 20:01
  #13 (permalink)  

Short Blunt Shock
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The NOAA's Herc(s) are not structurally modified in any way. The only mods are associated with the fitted sensor equipment.

If you think about it, why would flying through a hurricane be any different to any other weather phenomenon? The windspeeds you will encounter are no more fierce than in the average jetstream, and updraughts are considerably less intense than an average CB. What makes hurricanes so destructive is that these windspeeds reach ground level.

16B
16 blades is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2005, 04:59
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Down south, USA.
Posts: 1,594
Received 9 Likes on 1 Post
True, 16-blades.
One of their pilots was on a two-day trip this summer as my First Officer. The hurricane season began very early this summer.

In the guy's Hurricane Hunter, Air Force Reserve squadron at Keesler AFB, Biloxi (the town was one of several which were destroyed by Katrina), MS, they fly the older three-man c0ckp1t and also the newer J model, with the automated systems and EFIS. The guy also flew the B-52 and the Special Operations MC-130 (they sometimes must destroy navigational charts after a mission-you should hear about the squadron which was based in Taiwan many years ago...).

The RAF flies the J model, doesn't it?
Ignition Override is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2005, 08:38
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: 'Merica
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Looks absolutely breathtaking. Where do I apply...

:-)
Bear 555 is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2005, 10:09
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Behind the wire.
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post poll

Sorry to shatter anyone dreams. Alas, it is not the all-powerful helicopter we once thought


http://www.googlefight.com/index.php...ricane+Katrina

RIP Airwolf

High_Expect is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2005, 11:20
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Howe O' the Mearns
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Caught the last part of a CNN report the other day about the US sending fighter jets to fly through (above?) the hurricane to try and dissipate the force, how does this work? Or did I misinterpret?
During a recent trip to jolly Texas, I saw a news article featuring a mad boffin type who was proposing to use a series of jet engines pointing skywards, mounted on a raft, to in theory create mini-hurricanes in order to dissipate the latent atmospheric energy that would have the potential to allow stronger hurricanes to develop a la Ivan, Katrina etc.
In practical terms it seems to be akin to playing Russian Roulette with Mother Nature. What's to stop one of the mini-hurricanes developing into a Cat-5 state-buster?

As ever the sheer impracticality of the scheme will no doubt be seen as a challenge to the prowess of the US, making it all the more likely that such a hare-brained scheme be adopted.
bodach is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2005, 16:52
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: norn iron
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
16 Blades, as a hurricane is essentially made up of a huge spinning mass of CB cloud, in the case of Katarina with tops to FL520 (yep, 51000 FT deep CBs), then you can imagine that flying through one would be very unlike flying through a jetstream which is more often than not constant (though rapid) flow of air; only in some cases do jetstreams produce CAT. Nor would it be anything like the CBs we get in the UK (or even over Europe) where tops rarely get above FL400. The comparison is just slightly off.
cuthere is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.