Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

air combat typhoon v f15e

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

air combat typhoon v f15e

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Aug 2005, 07:32
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
air combat typhoon v f15e

well guys i read all the threads with intrest and enjoyed the banter but maybe in just a pilot to pilot thing out come maybe different on another day , as i recall f4 phantoms(raf) engageing vulcan in mock combat in playful times and in many cases the vulcan winning so was it playful training with the lads from lakenheath or maybe something else i wonder . draglie1 ( dab )
dragline1 is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2005, 08:29
  #2 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
The F4 would only lose if it played bomber rules. The first F4 engagement we had (F4E) the guy got in a turning/climbing fight - no contest. Then he bugged out, rolled in at 20 miles and splashed us F1 before we even knew it.

The F15s could probably have taken the Typhoon with different tactics, may be they did before the mixup.

Same as the Buccs taking an F15C. He got sucked in and they got a score draw 1-1 with 3 ac remaining.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2005, 19:25
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The Wonderful Midlands
Age: 53
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dragline1,

1; (Shift) Plus your letter of choice will produce a capital.
2; You might read with INTEREST.
3; Outcome is a single word
4; Engaging Dragline, ENGAGING.
5; Wing loading Dragline, wingloading.

The Vulcan had a low wing loading, which meant that at high altitudes, where the mighty V would have been keen to do most of it's evasive techniques, it would have had a damn sight more lift (and therefore smaller turning circle) than any Tornado, Lightning, F15, F16 etc...etc...

Simply, at altitude, in a close quarter fight, the Vulcan would have been able to out manouver any period fighter.

Trouble is, as Aircraft and weapons moved along into the BVR era, there wouldn't be an occasion where an F-15 might meet a Vulcan ambling along to drop a spot of sunshine. He would have been picked up and destroyed long since

As much as I hate to admit it, being a Die Hard Vulcan fan

Edited for spoolinmg
The Rocket is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2005, 03:26
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,083
Received 56 Likes on 34 Posts
Is pompous ass one word or two?

Last edited by West Coast; 4th Aug 2005 at 03:44.
West Coast is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2005, 05:30
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,838
Received 279 Likes on 113 Posts
It's two.....

Whereas the Vulcan might have used its (not "it's"...) agility at altitude against Lightnins and F4s, when the F-15 came along that was no longer the case. Turning at 45 deg AoB at FL400+, we were once rather miffed to see an F-15 sitting on the inside, tracking us nicely. It then overtook - on the inside - and disengaged.

Much of what we thought were correct tactics in the Vulcan were geared towards stern Atoll shots, or guns kills. We'd never heard of lag pursuit and didn't have any idea that much of our manouevring wouldn't have defeated a stern sector AIM 7......
BEagle is online now  
Old 4th Aug 2005, 07:01
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy

I once had an F3 (Tornado) in a 45 AOB turn at 45000Ft+ ! .......

Had to decend, obviously.

MW
MovinWings is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2005, 11:08
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the English lesson.
There is always one on a forum.
Do not worry unduly you are not too much of an arsehole if you only correct peoples grammar on forums, the real arseholes correct it also when speaking face to face.
boswell bear is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2005, 11:54
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Their Target for Tonight
Posts: 582
Received 28 Likes on 4 Posts
Ah, but then you'd be an arsehole with balls. (not a pretty picture, obviously...)

(edeted for atrosioucs spilleng)

Last edited by Red Line Entry; 8th Aug 2005 at 11:37.
Red Line Entry is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2005, 12:09
  #9 (permalink)  

Gentleman Aviator
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Teetering Towers - somewhere in the Shires
Age: 74
Posts: 3,700
Received 54 Likes on 26 Posts
peoples grammar on forums
... shouldn't that be people's grammar on fora ......
teeteringhead is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2005, 16:31
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Those errors have to be put in make the grammar correctors feel wanted
boswell bear is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2005, 17:31
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Glorious West Sussex
Age: 76
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I never would have dared to correct my grammar - she had a moustache and chest hair!

TP
TyroPicard is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2005, 18:09
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Just behind the back of beyond....
Posts: 4,187
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Joke 1 (obvious for the Army types, or journos): "Didn't stop you shagging her though."
Joke 2: "How do you know about the hairy chest?"
Jackonicko is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2005, 21:35
  #13 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
people being a collective noun should surely be peoples'
?
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 5th Aug 2005, 08:03
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The Wonderful Midlands
Age: 53
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Woo hoo...

And it starts......
The Rocket is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.