Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Nimrod to get bomber role

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Nimrod to get bomber role

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Jun 2005, 17:55
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There's very few UK airfields the B-52 can land at now due to the airfield lighting layouts.
rivetjoint is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2005, 17:56
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 64
Posts: 2,278
Received 36 Likes on 14 Posts
Above all, would this modification involve removing the pie oven?
Quite the opposite, another oven will be fitted and another two WSO's, the empty pie trays will be used as Chaff.
ZH875 is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2005, 18:16
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The Roman Empire
Posts: 2,452
Received 72 Likes on 33 Posts
Bluetail

I thought the Nimrod was trialled with 'dumb' bombs in 1982 with a view to giving it the capability to attack any naval shipping (principally the Argentine carrier) it might come across while carrying out its normal maritime role - rather than as a fall back option if the Vulcans had problems as you seem to imply. This was before the Nimrod had any SSM capability.

A bit of a suicidal option for Nimrod crews I would have thought, but there were lots of wacky ideas floating around then!!
Biggus is online now  
Old 12th Jun 2005, 18:31
  #24 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Why stick a few bombs on a Nimbomber? Stick lots more on a K or a J.

The Argosy was kitted to carry 8 x 1 000 lb.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2005, 18:33
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The front end and about 50ft up
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DinD,

Err... Just a thought. What about the 6 Anglo-French, very fast Olympus-engined jets decommissioned very recently.
I believe an military variant Concorde (they may have had to think of a different name, Discord perhaps) was proposed, which would have carried three Blue Steel underslung. IIRC, the Concorde airframe incorporated suitable hard points. I have an artist's impression from the time, which I'll stick up if I can find it. As you say, a number of such airframes became available recently. These had benefited from being well looked after and recently upgraded.

I wonder if the problems that prevented civils ops (ie CoA and BAe cooperation) would have been surmountable in military service? It's an interesting thought.
Fg Off Max Stout is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2005, 18:34
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 64
Posts: 2,278
Received 36 Likes on 14 Posts
The Argentinians tried bombing from a Herc, it dropped bombs, but the accuracy was somewhat doubtful.
ZH875 is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2005, 19:35
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: NEAR TO ISK
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Biggus

You may well be correct about the Mk2 using dumb bombs, me not being a "plumber" wouldn.t have known the difference,.

I allways thought Nimrod had a perfectly adequate anti ship weapon in the form of Harpoon at the time, and was trialled to bail out other platforms if it was required.

The only weapon fitted that I can recall that was for its own defence was AIM-9, which we fitted quite a while after Corporate.



BT
bluetail is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2005, 21:48
  #28 (permalink)  
Green Flash
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Surely, wth GPS or laser guided ordnance, the Mighty Kipper bomber will not need a bombsight? Just get it into the right area and let the satellites or FAC's get the stuff on target.
 
Old 12th Jun 2005, 21:49
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The Roman Empire
Posts: 2,452
Received 72 Likes on 33 Posts
Bluetail

I think you will find the Harpoon was introduced to the Nimrod after 1982. It only made it onto US aircraft for the first time in 1979!
Biggus is online now  
Old 12th Jun 2005, 22:28
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sunny Lincs
Age: 55
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ZH875, two more WSOs equals more work for WSOps when the poor darlings need feeding. Thanks for nothing.......
Stupid Boy is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2005, 01:48
  #31 (permalink)  

Rebel PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (formerly EICK)
Age: 51
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ZH875

aren't the Yanks tossing daisy cutters out of Hercs? Accuracy of those is less important I imagine!
MarkD is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2005, 02:12
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 516 Likes on 215 Posts
15,000 pound HE bombs do not require pinpoint precision....Knock...Knock!
SASless is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2005, 07:04
  #33 (permalink)  

Yes, Him
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: West Sussex, UK
Posts: 2,689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How many of them there Doodlebug thingies could you get into the Lanc?
Gainesy is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2005, 07:33
  #34 (permalink)  
Suspicion breeds confidence
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gibraltar
Posts: 2,405
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
400 miles in 24 hours for those little grey boats - unless there's an inconvenient piece of land in the way, of course!
Only very slow ones! I have vague memories of covering well over 700 (nautical) miles in one day and that beyond the range of most FJs.
Navaleye is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2005, 07:42
  #35 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,439
Received 1,599 Likes on 733 Posts
Letīs see a GFL get to Afghanistan then.....
ORAC is online now  
Old 13th Jun 2005, 07:47
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,819
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
700 miles a day with a few helicopters and a handful of single-engined SHARs? Or was that in proper carriers with credible Air Wings?

Whereas the Vulcan would cruise at around 480 knots TAS at 40000+; in other words 700 nautical miles in less than an hour and a half........

Discuss.

And yes, you can't really hold cockers Ps on a Vulcan, I suppose.
BEagle is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2005, 08:54
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The Roman Empire
Posts: 2,452
Received 72 Likes on 33 Posts
700nm+ in 24 hrs, an average of 29kts+ then.

Fine, what was the sea state at the time, try averaging 30kts when the sea state is up, what operations (i.e use of aircraft!) could you conduct while transitting at 30kts, and what is the speed of your escort ships (yes I know they should be able to do 30kts!!) and more importantly the ships in your supply chain. The average RFA would usually make about 20kts on a good day I would guess! The US might, but we don't build 30kt resupply vessels!!
Biggus is online now  
Old 13th Jun 2005, 10:59
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 516 Likes on 215 Posts
The US Navy and the US Air Force had this battle in the past.....you will notice that we have both now. It was a very rude fuss when it was going on.

The beauty of a carrier is it can show up off the coast of a trouble spot much easier than can the Air Force move into the area.

Naval Air was used in Afghanistan operating from carriers at sea. They used Air Force refuellers to do the job as I recall.
SASless is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2005, 12:25
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Scotland
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dear all,

What about all the B1s the Yanks have sitting at Davis-Monthan?

How about buying a couple of dozen of them?

I am sure they would be welcomed and Ice Station Kilo and perhaps reactivate somewhere on the west coast like Macrahanish or St Mawgan.

Cheers

BHR
BillHicksRules is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2005, 12:32
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Devon, England
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Naval Air was used in Afghanistan operating from carriers at sea. They used Air Force refuellers to do the job as I recall.
Didn't the RAF VC-10's and Tristars refuel a lot of USN sorties over Afghanistan flying out of Oman?
Think i've seen a few pics of F/A-18s refuelling from our hoses over there.
Razor61 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.