Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Glasses and Parades

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Glasses and Parades

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd April 2005 | 19:17
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: UK
Glasses and Parades

Whats the deal with this then lads? It may be different for you lot?

Here's a rough extract from I believe ACP 1919 on the Inspection/Formal Parades pages;

Glasses may only be worn by those with a valid medical reason to do so, and under no circumstances may these personel take part in formal parades/reviews.

What's that all about?? Nobody with glasses can be on a parade?!

Certainly on our Sqn, that would rule out about 20% of our cadets from taking part in parades. Any thoughts?

Last edited by PhilM; 22nd April 2005 at 19:32.
PhilM is offline  
Old 22nd April 2005 | 19:22
  #2 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Aviation Qualifications: Military (Retired)
Posts: 16,700
Likes: 54
From: Lincolnshire
I suspect that that could be a b*ll*cks order.

If those that wear glasses are excluded from an activity then the Disability Discrimination Act kicks in. Not to mention Equal Opportunities, Human Rights etc etc.

If I read your implication right we are talking cadets, ie civilians.

In other words, not a prayer.

Now sun glasses is another thing.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 22nd April 2005 | 19:23
  #3 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 71
From: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Plenty of folk with glasses do parades in the RAF and as I believe your dress regs are a direct extract from ours it'll probably be the same. ACP1919 is a little dated from what I can remember about the copy I've got gathering dust in Clothing Stores.

SWO's used to have a thing about folk who have to wear tinted glasses or only had 'defence specs'.

The new dress regs for the RAF are being sent out at the mo so that'd probably be your best port of call.

There is an electronic copy available via the MoD Intranet if you have access.
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 22nd April 2005 | 19:29
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: UK
Thanks lads, we are talking cadets (so civilian) yes, it did raise a few eyebrows when I pointed it out to the CO, in our minds in constitutes discrimination, and we cannot see a valid H&S reason for it being there.
PhilM is offline  
Old 22nd April 2005 | 19:37
  #5 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6,490
Likes: 2
From: Between the woods and the water
There were several service lads/lasses wearing specs in the contribution from Benson that led the Remembrance Day parade in Wallingford last November.

I'll ask the ATC Squadron in Wallingford (as I'm on their civ ctee) next week.
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 22nd April 2005 | 20:10
  #6 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
From: Cambridge
So do any ex apprentices (you can admit it on here) remember doing the route lining parades in London for visiting heads of state etc ?

I can well remember the ones left behind at Cosford, they were either speccy, spotty, short arsed or some combination of the three.

Discrimination ? Absolutely, in the 80's, of course i'm sure it's all changed now though.

Safety_Helmut
Safety_Helmut is offline  
Old 23rd April 2005 | 06:36
  #7 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 5
From: UK
Sounds like a perfect excuse for a bit of parade ground dodging.
Megaton is offline  
Old 23rd April 2005 | 07:42
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,776
Likes: 1
From: UK
Of course it's an illegal regulation - I wouldn't mind betting that it's an admin matter that it exists in the AP; it'll probably be changed when the next amendment is issued.

These APs are routinely reviewed and amended at varying intervals; the interval depends on many factors, including the rate at which the subject matter is likely to change. For example, computer security regs will be reviewed and changed much more frequently to keep abreast of the latest innovations in technology. By contrast, parade ground regs are usually set in tablets of stone and amended by clerks using quills - there is little need to change the way parades are conducted.

Besides, readership numbers are probably very low, and neither is it likely to be challenged in court [not worth the effort, unless you are a rabid anti-discrimination type].

A call to the appropriate office in MOD will probably bring a signal amendment out within a few days...
FJJP is offline  
Old 23rd April 2005 | 09:06
  #9 (permalink)  

TAC Int Bloke
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 974
Likes: 0
From: UK
Being a specky t*** never got me off parade
Maple 01 is offline  
Old 23rd April 2005 | 10:14
  #10 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: London
Route Lining

Safety_Helmut

I remember one particular DI (with large black rimmed specs) who would march out wearing them. Once he had done his bit checking that we were all equally spaced out he would perform a 'by numbers' routine that involved balancing his SLR between his legs whilst placing offending specs in top pocket.

Do the RAF (QCS excepted) still take part in state occasions in these lean days?
Bclass is offline  
Old 23rd April 2005 | 18:53
  #11 (permalink)  

I'matightbastard
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Maybe it's a misprint and it should read "Glasses may only be carried..."
Onan the Clumsy is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.