Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Would you ditch a Vulcan or a Victor?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Would you ditch a Vulcan or a Victor?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Apr 2005, 13:52
  #1 (permalink)  
Suspicion breeds confidence
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gibraltar
Posts: 2,406
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 4 Posts
Would you ditch a Vulcan or a Victor?

I hear the latter had very poor ditching characteristics (why?) but what about the Vulcan.? Is it preferable just to bang out first?
Navaleye is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2005, 14:43
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Land of the Rising Taxes
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Navaleye,

3 of the crew did not have a choice of "banging out". Although I believe an ejection system was designed by Martin Baker but rejected on cost (monetary)
Stan Bydike is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2005, 15:43
  #3 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
I can't remember the name of the film, I guess Beagle will, but the callsign of the aircraft was PEDRO ZEBRA a Vulcan on an Atlantic navex that ran out of fuel! As it was a ditching film they dismissed the bail out option.

Ditching was preferable as all crew would be together in the MS5. They could pool the rations from the single seat dinghies and they would have 5 sets of SARAH which meant they had a total battery life of about 40 hours or 5 days if they only switched on periodically.

The Vulcan was apparently supposed to be a good ditcher and indeed when one did a wheels up landing the ground effect when it was below undercarriage height minimised the damage.

The bomb bay doors were pretty substantial and would possibly have remained intact.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2005, 16:08
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Witney UK
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Victor, in short, no. Thank goodness nobody ever had to though a couple of crews got close to it in Corporate but I suspect the aircraft would have pitched in very quickly. The combination of a high wing and the underwings on the Mk2 would tend to tip the nose in I guess. A simular visual bomb aimers window in the nose of the Valiant collapsed on nosewheel failure so water ingestion into the cockpit could be rapid. All theory but I am not aware that any model tests were carried out. We carried a multi seat dingy though behind the cockpit released from inside.

Last edited by Art Field; 8th Apr 2005 at 16:22.
Art Field is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2005, 16:10
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: western europe
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
3 of the crew did not have a choice of "banging out".
I remember reading about the LHR Incident and the unfortunate fate of the guys in the back .....

Are there other RAF Aircraft (still in operation) that share this characteristic?
hobie is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2005, 18:34
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Age: 84
Posts: 897
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How could you hear they had bad ditching characteristics when it never happened?
Samuel is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2005, 18:44
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: As far from the sea as possible
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How would you get out of the cockpit of the vulcan in a ditching (or wheels up landing)? the door is in the bottom. Presumably the canopy would be jetisoned prior to the arrival?

Matty
MMEMatty is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2005, 18:59
  #8 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Matty, yes. The canopy could be jettisoned. Once the hood had gone the copilot, assumming he was capable, would stand on his seat and inflate the MS5 which was on top of the cabin and under the canopy.

He would then board the dinghy and the rear crew would squeeze passed the two bang seats, over the side, and into the dinghy. They would pass all three rear crew survival packs and the nav bags into the dinghy and also the copilot's seat pack. Finally the Captain would join them all and hold a roll call.


REALLY!


If one or two of the rear crew were injured, it was always the AEO in the drills, he would be manhandled to the bottom of the bang seats, his dinghy lanyard would then be passed under his arms or through his LSJ or pressure jerkin beckets and hauled up by two crew members above and pushed by two from below.

When a cockpit evacuation happened for real at Finningley, the staff Plotter, the last rear crewman who should have got out, was out first, through the live bang seats, over the copilot and down the nose.

Samuel:

"How could you hear they had bad ditching characteristics when it never happened?"

Easy. Models.

The Nimrod, on that basis, also had bad ditching characteristics. The pilots would cream the upswept tail along the sea surface until the nose dropped. The nose would then hammer down killing both pilots and the flt eng through the g-force. The rest of the rear crew, strapped in aft of the galley would survive but might drown as the bomb doors collapsed and the flat pressure hull floor gave way.

Only thing is it didn\'t at Art Stacey will confirm.

Models am one thing and real planes something else again.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2005, 19:05
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,847
Received 319 Likes on 115 Posts
No - we'd leg it over the side and take to our single seat dinghies, leaving the lower deck to bugger about with the multi-seat dinghy as best they could!














No - of course I'm not serious
BEagle is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2005, 19:45
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Age: 84
Posts: 897
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wasn't there a Bond film where a Vulcan , complete with a nuclear weapon the size of a car, ditched and ended up on the seabed in shallow water with its wheels down?

Yeah! Right!
Samuel is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2005, 19:58
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,847
Received 319 Likes on 115 Posts
Thunderball
BEagle is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2005, 20:07
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Age: 84
Posts: 897
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank you, I'll take two!
Samuel is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2005, 00:01
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,346
Received 22 Likes on 11 Posts
The rest of the rear crew, strapped in aft of the galley
Errr, I don't think so, unless they have moved the galley to just behind the flight deck......
reynoldsno1 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.