Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Merlin in Iraq

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Apr 2005, 17:50
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 608
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Saw a few CS95 outfits at Henlow following some burning/flash fire trials. I believe the trials were as a result of a Puma crash in the Gulf a year or so ago. It was quite clear that the CS95 was almost worthless compared to a proper flying suit, but also the lack of suitable underware (longjohns and rollneck, not just a teeshirt) also contributed to the severity of the burns.

Its hard to resist the temptation to dress for comfort, and I know accidents are few and far between, but I guess it comes down to dressing to survive (if the bloody kit is available in the first place!)

H Peacock
H Peacock is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2005, 18:02
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Grobelling through the murk to the sunshine above.
Age: 60
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In my experience the vast majority of RAF SH crews wear some kind of ground pattern equipment when in an operational theatre. The reasons are many and various, my own reasoning was normally based on practicality, in that it is easier to live in an operational environment (normally tented or very basic) in ground pattern clothing.

One or two people I know used to put a flying suit on on top of this clothing when flying - for the fire retardent properties - but I don't think they'd be doing that in Iraq temperatures.

CS95 is known to have poor fire resistance, and was (is?) banned aboard RN ships for that reason. Funny that is was good enough for the hardy souls manning the Green Goddesses a couple of years ago though!
Pub User is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2005, 18:05
  #23 (permalink)  
MG
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 593
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
As someone else who is involved in the trial of the non-FJ, flame-retardent AEA, yes it is a bit thicker in its temperate DPM guise. It does feel a little scratchier but that wears off after a couple of washes. Once the trial has been successful, it will be issued in a lighter weight desert version with the same flame-retardent qualities as the desert flying suit. There has been no DPM suit in a flame-retardent material so far because the technology simply hasn't been there, believe it or not.
The trial suits are, in style, exactly the same as CS95 and, therefore, there are the same problems with belt loops and snagging etc, that the SH force has always encountered on ops, only this time, you're not going to go up like a Roman Candle. Surely, a good thing?
Overall, apart from a few small niggles, we think that it's a positive step and think that it can't be issued soon enough. One drawback:- It's expensive and once your tankie on the ground sees it, they're all going to be putting in a bid for some! Why not? Your average tankie and Warrior rider is as at much risk from fire as us in the air!
MG is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2005, 19:19
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Shinnies and DS

For your info not that you are interested the stewards on on 10s & Trimotors have no choice but to wear dessert flying suits by order. Ask them what they think next time they pour you a gopping cupper and you will find that they would gladly give them up.
vicky10 is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2005, 21:09
  #25 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,556
Received 1,687 Likes on 777 Posts
To summarise, if I understand. Those that have have, don't want them. Those that need them don't have them. SOP.
ORAC is online now  
Old 21st Apr 2005, 09:45
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you have been warned!!!!!!

After May 5 The Airforce will be broken up. All Fast jet assets will be transfered to the navy and will thus be known as The Fleet Land Arm, All rotery [nearly there] And AT assetts are to be
handed over to yes the Army. Flying suits and blues are to be returned to clothing stores if they are open? Or is that wombat supply wing????????
It will solve the clothing issue you can all dress the same.
vicky10 is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2005, 10:18
  #27 (permalink)  

Yes, Him
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: West Sussex, UK
Posts: 2,689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
dessert flying suits
What else would a steward wear?
Gainesy is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2005, 10:51
  #28 (permalink)  
Just a numbered other
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Earth
Age: 72
Posts: 1,169
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fish

Were these the Merlins I saw landing at Nice (NCE) a few weeks back?
Arkroyal is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2005, 21:52
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Devil

Re: H Peacocks statement about wearing long johns and roll neck.

I agree that in the normal temperate environment there is really no excuse for not wearing the correct AEA but it is completely impractical for aircrew to wear that amount of clothing when working at +55deg C. The risk of becoming a heat stress casualty is far higher than suffering burns. Also given the fact that the risk of getting rounds into the cabin is higher than the aircraft catching fire and the fact that an extra layer of clothing provides zero additional ballistic protection I think I'll opt for the comfier option of DP's. And I'll say an extra prayer to the god of procurements asking for some better body armour!
WokkaCrewman is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2005, 08:02
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Somewhere in UK
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice to see SOME of you RAF boys can even get the correct kit for the area you are about to operate in.

Our thick Civie friend who issues (??) our AEA thinks we only fly in Cornwall and if you are not scaled for the clothing .......well. Basically no chance of the desert AEA's for us, apparently "they don't make them anymore"

How do our Army pals find getting the correct AEA?
Triple Matched TQ is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2005, 17:32
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But - does anyone know how the Merlins are doing in Iraq??
Compressorstall is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2005, 21:08
  #32 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
The Merlins are doing brilliantly in Iraq.




If you read the RAF News.





and, as Mandy Rice Davis, they would say that wouldn't they.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2005, 07:49
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So, does anyone actually know how the Merlins are doing in Iraq, despite creating a clothing debate?

Last edited by Compressorstall; 24th Apr 2005 at 17:46.
Compressorstall is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2005, 12:34
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: east of england
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They're doing very well. There's a pretty accurate report in the latest edition of JDW.
Weezer is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2005, 21:08
  #35 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Or to re-phrase the last answer, do you really expect closed stories from an operational theatre to appear here in real time?
Pontius Navigator is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.