Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Slightly Low Level Phantom..

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Slightly Low Level Phantom..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Feb 2005, 22:42
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Slightly Low Level Phantom..

I saw this picture of a phantom at very low level, at, or close to the speed of sound.

I have some experience of very low level flight, Not in the fast stuff sadly.

My question is (with regard to the picture, low level and speed involved) what ticked boxes are required to fly this low at speed without becoming cat 1 in the process.

Naturally I assume that lack of wind, turbulence, and stable introvert character all play a major part of the decision making process.

Thanks in advance.

http://www.militaryaircraft.de/aviex...f4-phantom.jpg
Maczz is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2005, 07:46
  #2 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
That's low level?

That's medium level stuff compared with what the F105 did in trials. Years ago the USAF experimented with trying to kill people - on the ground - with ultra low level flight.

They concluded that an F105 at 6 feet would do the trick. I think the question remained was it the bang or the Thud that killed them?
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2005, 08:21
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hebra Outerdies
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thats not low!! You could fly a Jaguar underneath if you look at the Thummers video!!

Nice pikkie though!
Champagne Anyone? is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2005, 08:33
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Getting really low in an F-4 was difficult because of the rather bulbous nose and, in the UK versions, its extra sensitivity in pitch. The E-model was a lot easier because it had a narrower nose. I always maintained that we were going some if we found ourselves lower than a Buccaneer.
Zoom is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2005, 09:07
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Spain
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
In fact, it's the stable EXtrovert the recruiters go for. As for low level, I take my hat off to the Bucc mates, and I'm ex-F4 (and Tornado).
maxburner is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2005, 10:46
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 115
Received 44 Likes on 22 Posts
Laarbruch – early 70’s. ‘Sleepy’ Fred (if memory serves) was the Labour Def Min and had come with a party of VIPs to gaze in awe at the new Rapier in action. The batteries were sited by the taxiway adjacent to the tower, MEZCO was in Local and all awaited the airfield attack from the Buccs. I guess the only peeps who knew what would happen next were those directly involved with the attack planning! They appeared from everywhere (or so it seemed to me at the time). The tree line was pretty close to the manoeuvring area and the sneaky bu**ers used that to mask their approach. Needless to say, MEZCO and various execs had a purple fit as the Rapier guys got nowhere near achieving a lock! Only other almost comparable sights – ‘Fiery Cross’ and the last Lightning mass display at Wattisham with combined 111 and (Colts’) 65 in formation. Caused a bit of a rumpous when they flew at the crowd line (line abreast IIRC) and then pulled-up with burners lit.

Now that's what I call LL!

Ahhhhh happy days indeed!

Last edited by Canary Boy; 1st Mar 2005 at 11:57.
Canary Boy is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2005, 11:53
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Getting really low in an F-4 was difficult because of the rather bulbous nose and, in the UK versions, its extra sensitivity in pitch. The E-model was a lot easier because it had a narrower nose. I always maintained that we were going some if we found ourselves lower than a Buccaneer.
In a top gun voice.....

Not if you're inverted it aint!

CAC Runaway is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2005, 11:59
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Longton, Lancs, UK
Age: 80
Posts: 1,527
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Zoom

I always looked up to you Phantom chaps -----------
jindabyne is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2005, 15:59
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If you think that's low then see:

http://www.zeeb.at/oops/F14-flyby.jpg
Langball is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2005, 16:46
  #10 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Abingdon in the 60s I believe, Lightning departure at about .98 appeared stage left lower than the hangar roof. By the time I got my eyes caged and saw the hangar he'd gone. Then No 2 departed l o w e r
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2005, 17:55
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 458
Received 22 Likes on 12 Posts
Would still love to see the infamous F4 beatup of the grad at Cranwell, from mid-80's?

Somebody must have something somewhere!!
Jobza Guddun is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2005, 20:42
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Champagne,

Check the pic link. Seems to be the evidence required to show that the Jag mates could indeed underfly....

http://braden.buzzword.com/military/LowFlyingAircraft
Maczz is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2005, 01:54
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: OZ
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just remember you can only ever equal the World Record!
OBNO is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2005, 09:02
  #14 (permalink)  
Nixor ut Ledo
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: In a Beaut of a State
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Place - Honington - early 80s

Occasion - Buccs departing for the frozen north in deference to the (then) new Tornado

Situation - top of SHQ roof waiting for the 4 ship flypast.

They appeared behind the trees from the Ixworth direction, seemed to come around SHQ (two either side) and below the top storey and proceeded to thread themselves through the gaps between the hangars lower than the roof line. Then buggered off in the direction of Thetford.

Bloody marvellous

Anyone here in that formation?
allan907 is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2005, 09:16
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 115
Received 44 Likes on 22 Posts
Same place but in the 70's. Didn't see it myself (must have been off shift) but the story goes that a certain OCU mate took one of the Hunters through (between) the stadium lights on the ASP!
Canary Boy is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2005, 11:51
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Standing on the LSO platform on the USS Saratoga in 1977 or 78 and watched two Buccaneers from the Ark Royal come in below flight deck level (60ft). They rolled inverted over the ship and went back below flight deck level before rolling back upright!
Impressive!
Tomcat51 is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2005, 20:16
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 4,379
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
Arrow

Tomcat,

A few photos of Bucc low passes here. I foolishly "lent" the photo of one going under the angle to the pilot: 30 years later, still waiting to get it back
John Eacott is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2005, 00:45
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 518 Likes on 216 Posts
Who has the photograph of a B-52 passing by a US Aircraft carrier below deck height.....that probably is the cake taker! It was posted here some time in the past as I recall.
SASless is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2005, 06:34
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 139
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wasnt there a RNZAF Skyhawk that did a pass below the deck of a RN Carrier? I saw a photo of it with the deck hands looking down on it.
Lindstrim is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2005, 11:00
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oxfordshire
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here's a couple of my photos of the RAF's frontliners doing what they do best...



jonesy1275 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.