Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Merlin

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Jan 2005, 07:41
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What exactly do we mean when we say "it's a great aircraft"?
Bag Man is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2005, 08:13
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well there's only 5 words in your question, so which do you not understand?



TOG
Toxteth O'Grady is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2005, 08:42
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Scotland
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just breaking now:

Lockheed Team Wins Presidential Chopper

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - In a surprise move, the U.S. Navy has chosen a
transatlantic team led by Lockheed Martin Corp. to build a new U.S.
presidential helicopter fleet in a deal valued at well over $1 billion,
several congressional sources said on Friday.

The decision was a stunning setback for Connecticut-based United
Technologies Corp.'s Sikorsky Aircraft unit -- which for nearly 50
years has
built and maintained the green and white "Marine One" helicopters that
fly
the president.

Sen. Charles Schumer, a New York Democrat, announced the decision in a
press
release, saying Lockheed's victory would bring hundreds of new jobs to
its
Owego, New York plant.

Lockheed, the Pentagon's No. 1 supplier, is pushing a spin-off of a
three-engined EH101 helicopter made by AgustaWestland Inc., an
Anglo-Italian
unit of Italy's Finmeccanica SpA . Fort Worth, Texas-based Textron
Inc.'s
Bell Helicopter is the other big partner.

The contract could also give Lockheed a boost when the Air Force next
year
orders 194 search and rescue helicopters that could be worth more than
$6
billion.

In addition, the winner would have bragging rights that could help sell
another 200 helicopters to the U.S. Coast Guard and Department of
Homeland
Security, plus any overseas bounce.
--
ranger703 is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2005, 09:50
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 5,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just breaking now?

It's been posted and discussed here and in the Rotorheads Forum for almost 12 hours.
Heliport is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2005, 10:12
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Now that the yanks have bought Merlin I suppose the Mk1 can kiss goodbye to it's long awaited spares as Agusta/Westlands will be bending over backwards to please it's new best friend !!!
toplad_22 is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2005, 16:12
  #66 (permalink)  
hyd3failure
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Really great news for WHL. Congratulations to the entire workforce.
 
Old 30th Jan 2005, 15:24
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: the Port Wait.....again
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I knew it, its the Pilot's fault. We should fire them all, then the Engineers can work on the cabs in the hangar to their hearts content without ever having the added pressure of making the aircraft serviceable to fly. And everyone will be happy, because we can wait as long as we like for the "spares to support the intial design " to be delivered, and the parts that were hugely over-estimated in their expected life won't wear out, 'cos we won't be using them.

Yes the drivers are the true villains for expecting too much of the machine they risk their lives in.

Selecting sarcasm off, resuming Sunday afternoon.

Last edited by Duncan Bucket; 30th Jan 2005 at 16:03.
Duncan Bucket is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2005, 17:16
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My God jungly, I thought I'd heard it all, but Merlins problems being the fault of pilots!!

What planet are you on???
sweep complete is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2005, 18:38
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It seems that the "c#*p" Merlin appears to have beaten off competition from one of the worlds biggest helicopter manufacturers. Can't be that bad if they are prepared to fly George Dubya round in it!
TheWizard is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2005, 19:24
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 3,225
Received 172 Likes on 65 Posts
"Don't blame the procurers or the loggies......."


Good post Jungly. Spot on. Too many requirements are articulated, and hence funding dictated, without support specialist input. As approx 70% of through life costs are in the In-Service Support phase, if you get it wrong up front, it's always wrong. The recent move in DPA to be more strict and trade out performance (not just time and cost) is a direct result of what you describe.
tucumseh is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2005, 20:39
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Anywhere there's ships and aircraft available
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fish

Trying to gauge the level of support required of a new aircraft is notoriously difficult as has been shown by C130J, Merlin and Apache. We haven't really even solved the problem with Sea Kings 30 years on. This is not somebodies FAULT but just a fact of the business were in.

Personally the VX1 decision is, I believe, a good piece of news for UK plc and if the Yanks build a better version I am sure (like the GR7) we may just buy it back.

Quantity of aircraft ordered WILL lead to a reduction in costs of unit spares and if the other orders for USAF and USCG go the same way will make the aircraft a truly global product.

Oh and for those of you who always slag this aircraft off - the US101 won this competition against the odds on MERIT.

I rest my case on all previous posts the US NAVY procurement system has proved it.



Si Clik is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2005, 20:48
  #72 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Am I just being cynical in thinking that political machinations may have had a hand in the US buying a brit Helo after our long and expensive support of US foreign adventures?

I suspect they, quite rightly, think they can solve bthe problems because they are not a cottage industry
Tourist is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2005, 08:24
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In A Galaxy Far, Far Away...
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SI-CLIK..............I heartily agree with everything you say in the defence of Merlin, and I also believe it is a cracking bit of kit. We just need the stores/logistic support to catch up, then it will prove itself in the Fleet, and all the naysayers can have a huge slice of humble pie..................

However, I must correct you on one small fact. HMX-1 is the US Marine Corps Sqn that flies Dubya around, and is the Test and Evaluation Sqn for the USMC. They are the one's who had a hand in the decision. VX-1 conducts similar testing and evaluation, but for the US Navy, and so are busy with other aircraft types. Unlike us poor relations, the USMC and USN are completly seperate forces, and never the twain shall meet.

You learn something new everyday.............
FORMER PIONEER is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2005, 08:54
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The Duchy
Posts: 87
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Si Clic.... get back to the real world!!

"Oh and for those of you who always slag this aircraft off - the US101 won this competition against the odds on MERIT."

The USA choice of 'US101' was not made on merit alone. It is a crum of thanks for UK's adventure in Dubya's Iraq war. Nothing more, nothing less.

Until the RN is provided with adequate stores and engineering resources, Merlin will remain an outrageously expensive solution to a pretty basic problem (embarked ASW/ASuW/HDS, etc, etc.)
fuel2noise is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2005, 08:57
  #75 (permalink)  
Suspicion breeds confidence
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gibraltar
Posts: 2,405
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
It looks like the UK workshare will be 20% or less, so its not that huge. It is arguably the most prestigeous project going, so well done. I hope they spend more time in the air than ours do.

junglyAEO, I applaud your optimism about getting our hands on a bunch of E2Cs, but I don\'t think there\'s a hope in hells chance of it ever happening. The SK 7 platform has turned out to be much better than we expected. It does have big limitations in covering deep strikes however. I also don\'t see any practical method of landing and E2 on CVF, unless we end up with a CTOL CVF.
Navaleye is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2005, 11:32
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Oxon
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hear, Hear Si Clik...........

And if there was more than a hint of truth that US101 won on the back of TB's support, who cares. But then that would overlook that US101 was arguably the better fit for the spec required............?

Logistic Support ...... OK, there have been some issues and these will continue. There is however an element of 'you get what you pay for' here and Merlin is no different to any other product or service, it costs what it costs - so if appropriate funding is missing or the scaling somehow deficient.......... ????

The future....... from economy of scale savings to some radical MLUs...... exciting prospects although these won't feed through until the next decade.....

Finally, when the government of the day says jump (or in this case, buy) the MOD is almost duty-bound to say how high (or in this case, how many) rather than why........ Still, in terms of capability, Merlin has something new to bring to the party - just got to think beyond the existing party scenario perhaps.... ??
foiled again is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2005, 14:23
  #77 (permalink)  
High Wing Drifter
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The USA choice of 'US101' was not made on merit alone. It is a crum of thanks for UK's adventure in Dubya's Iraq war. Nothing more, nothing less.
The general point of VXX (US101) is to sell a further 220 to the marines, that is the real prize that LM are looking at. I am sure that the US will throw some kind of lifeline to Sikorsky though.
 
Old 31st Jan 2005, 17:51
  #78 (permalink)  
High Wing Drifter
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The USAF are looking for a Personnel Recovery Vehicle (aka CSAR) platform, that the Merlin was always touted as a likely platform. Is this what you mean?
Yes, that is what I meant
 
Old 31st Jan 2005, 18:27
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Devon
Posts: 2,812
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
Perhaps the job losses have something to do with with delays to SCMR?

This is an interesting article.

See also: 829 NAS and 815 NAS

Last edited by WE Branch Fanatic; 31st Jan 2005 at 19:04.
WE Branch Fanatic is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2005, 14:34
  #80 (permalink)  
crossbow
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
WEBF - good post fella. I think that the majority of job losses at Wastelands are in the rotable section. i.e. Transmissions and drive shafts. Which makes sense as WHL won the contract to build the airframes and R.Blades.
I will be very interested to see how the companies fortunes pan out should they not win F Lynx and like youre link states, the NH90 wins the day.
 


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.