Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Pay 2005

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Feb 2005, 15:57
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Just down the road from ISK
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Out of interest, how much does a Flt LT aircrew earn all in, at the end of his first tour these days? £45, 50k?
Hmmm, I must have done something wrong then. not making 50K as PAS. Not far off though!!!!
Vage Rot is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2005, 18:27
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
End of first tour Flt lt would earn basic Flt Lt wage with a couple of years seniority and lower rate flying pay; so probably about 35-36K.
the_cyclone is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2005, 19:00
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Richard Burtonville, South Wales.
Posts: 2,341
Received 66 Likes on 47 Posts
Cyclone

Thanks for the post. £35-36k. The gap has remained about the same then, from what I can see.

CG
charliegolf is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2005, 19:26
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MOD web site lists Flt Lt pay (with 4 years service) as approx £35000 + £12500 flying pay (max) + other allowances. BSA for example up to 4000+ per term. Together with generous pension/gratuity terms does not seem unreasonable. However as I said earlier I believe there should be some major re-alignment with regard to rewards for high risk operations. Such operations and those actually at risk needs to be very much more clearly defined than at present. Award of medals should have the same scrutiny and defenitions. Please let us reward the "front line" people and stop the "jollies" to theatre to qualify for medals should they be granted.
WorkingHard is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2005, 20:23
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Far far away
Age: 53
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pay comparisons

I recently did a short survey of a Flt Lt RAF, a Flt Lt RAAF and a USAF Capt (all O-3),with 9 years commissioned service, qualified Pilot, 'Aircraft Commander', 3000 hours; deployed to Operational area 2 months of the year and visiting an Operational area on 2 other occasions, during different months.

Their ANNUAL TAKE-HOME PAY looked something like this:

RAF: £32453.00

USAF: $72046.00 (without retention pay)
AT £1.00 = $1.9: £37919.00

RAAF: AUS$76860.00
AT £1.00 = AUS$2.44 £31500.00

When you factor-in the cost of living, the deployment rates, the age of the aircraft, etc etc, I know where I'd rather be, and it's sunny there.
D-IFF_ident is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2005, 22:05
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Glowcesestershiiiire
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
WH

On the subject of medals. I watched a bunch of my mates come home in the back of a C-17 last week three years after some of them qualified for the AFGAN gong for operational flying. Most of them still hadn't been awarded it, yet there are hundreds of (no disrespect intended) blunties sporting thiers. What's that all about??????????
k1rb5 is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2005, 22:54
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Outbound
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
D-IFF, are your figures accurate? I'm sure that the gross annual basic salary for a Flt Lt with a couple of years in the rank is around £32 000, but with 9 years' service, plus being combat ready, he should at least have £4 500 initial rate flying pay to stick on top of that, plus another couple of increments. Must be closer to £38 000 in the situation you describe.

If you're referring to take-home pay as net post-tax etc pay (sorry, not terribly familiar with the terms) surely it must be less than that?

Unless another couple of increments plus middle/top rate flying pay are going to send my pay to the sort of levels where I take home £32kpa, in which case thanks for the pleasant surprise
5 Forward 6 Back is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2005, 23:27
  #28 (permalink)  

Champagne anyone...?
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: EGDL
Age: 54
Posts: 1,420
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

5F6B. Pleasant surprises all round then. I take home a bit more than 32kpa. Do I win a bun?
StopStart is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2005, 07:37
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
k1rb - exactly the point I was making. AND of those who have the medal already how many "earned" it?
WorkingHard is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2005, 07:54
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,842
Received 302 Likes on 114 Posts
Presumably the Akrotiri schoolies didn't get it this time.....
BEagle is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2005, 08:18
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Manila Philippines
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On the issue of medals the OP Telic medal was awarded to "aircrew" who flew in and out of Kuwait between certain dates.. But the Air stewards and Ground Engineers who were on the same aircraft did not qualify.. a special case had to be submitted, awhich I belive has now been resolved.

The reason I was told by the medal cell is the requirements for the medal is drawn up by the Army?

Plus while I am on my box ..Why do we have to apply for medals ourselves ?? why do the blunties not know who should be awarded them...AND why are they presented in the Sqn registry by a JNCO clerk???

I have 6 medals and none presented properley not even LSGCM ..

Rant over... lets hope for a good payrise. I will be happy with 20%.....in my dreams
L1011GE is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2005, 08:37
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: various bits of UK
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BEagle
Presumably the Akrotiri schoolies didn't get it this time.....
That is correct but they got one out in the UAE...How far?..and I hear that the was an admin cell inside insworth that also qualified...will someone pass me the rules of engagement please!
phutbang is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2005, 09:21
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is in your hand guys and gals to do something about the blatant injusticies. If the only weapon you have is to embarrass the senior staff then use it to it's full. those who have received something they have no "right" to hate publicity. In any event it really is incumbent upon you to ensure the value of medals is not destroyed by blatant abuse of the system. So post some examples. New thread if you like. Just for the record, I am ex mil, I dislike low flying and I have no time for the whingers (in any walk of life). I believe very strongly there should be proper reward and proper recognition for those who actually earn it.
WorkingHard is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2005, 14:02
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Much-Binding-in-the-Marsh
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We probably should have a new thread on medals but while the debate is raging on this thread my favourite medal anecdote (goes back some years) is:

Troopship on its way from Blighty to somewhere well to the East taking a battalion of the Welsh Guards to an exercise. Stops in Suez - some lads get laid and catch a dose. Dose only becomes apparent as ship nears Singapore so squaddies are off-loaded into the local British Medical Hospital for treatment. Rest of Battalion complete exercise and collect the now fully recovered squaddies on the return trip. Now at the time the Malayan insurgency campaign was in full flow and - you guessed it - the squaddies qualified for the GSM Malaya medal during their enforced lay-over. The rest of the battalion did not and were distinctly unimpressed!
Impiger is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2005, 14:51
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Isnt it lucky that commissions cannot be bought these days? Am I being naieve in that question? Windsors e.g.?
WorkingHard is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2005, 23:36
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Here,there,everywhere
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AonP

If you were with the comedy camping club, then u dont deserve one. You would think the amatuer camping clowns had won the war themselves the way they 'bleat' on.
Fire 'n' Forget is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2005, 00:43
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Several miles SSW of Watford Gap
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
L1011GE

'Plus while I am on my box ..Why do we have to apply for medals ourselves ?? why do the blunties not know who should be awarded them...AND why are they presented in the Sqn registry by a JNCO clerk??? '

You have to apply for them yourselves because no-one has funded a system that can accurately tell where everyone is or where they’ve been - funding priorities lie further towards the punchy end. As for being presented with your medals, that is a Command Issue so have I hope your not blaming that on the blunties. If there is a problem then (guessing from your log in) it lies with Engineering Officers (whom I assume you don't count as blunt as your either TG1or 2 and don't count yourself as blunt) and Aircrew Officers.

By the way anyone think that the medals offices that issue these (not manned by Service personnel) have been given any significant increase in resources to cope with Tony's love of medal earning opportunities for our gallant armed forces.
Climebear is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2005, 07:07
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,842
Received 302 Likes on 114 Posts
Have they stopped the nonsense of "Here is your medal, congratulations. And you're not allowed to wear it" which went on with the Kuwaiti and Saudi medals post-GW1?

Used to annoy me seeing spams wearing them when the UK military wasn't allowed to..... Nothing against the spams, I hasten to add, but everything against the faceless people who wouldn't allow us to wear medals legitimately presented by the rulers of Saudi Arabia and Kuwait.

Last edited by BEagle; 20th Feb 2005 at 07:30.
BEagle is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2005, 08:42
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Much-Binding-in-the-Marsh
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But BEags old chap disallowing the wearing of medals presented by foreign governments is part and parcel of the preservation of the quality of our medals. Can't have cake and eat it!

And yes it still happens - presented a NATO Medal the other day to a matelot who had driven a ship on Active Endeavour the NATO Article V operation that is on-going in the Med. It is a counter-terrorist operation but UK view is that it is not sufficiently arduous or dangerous to merit the wearing of the award - and they're right.
Impiger is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2005, 14:14
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lincs
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You have to apply for them yourselves because no-one has funded a system that can accurately tell where everyone is or where they’ve been - funding priorities lie further towards the punchy end
Doesn't Innsworth run a system called OMIS to carry out this very task?

SBG
Spotting Bad Guys is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.