Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

RAF aptitudes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Dec 2004, 15:58
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: LONDON
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RAF aptitudes

hi i was wondering if you could give me any input as i have untill friday to make a desision. I am at leeds university partaking in aviation with pilot studies. I recently applied to the RAF and was at OASC all weekend i was informed that i missed out by 3 marks for pilot but could join the University Air Squadron as any ground branch. I am now wondering if i join the UAS as a ground branch will this give me any advantage after university in joining the RAF as pilot/navigator. I can also resit the aptitude tests after Uni not sure what to do? any input would be most appreciated
Glenn
Glenn85 is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2004, 16:17
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Learn to write in English properly if you want to become an officer!
rivetjoint is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2004, 16:23
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Anywhere there's ships and aircraft available
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fish

Join the Navy!

RAF aptitude scores are presently artificially high due to low requirement.

RN needs lots of good people to fly.



Si Clik is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2004, 16:32
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Wherever I'm told
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rivetjoint,

The aim of these forums, as has been said many times, is to help those with honest questions. They would be a much nicer place to use for that purpose if people like you would stop making nasty, pointless comments. Remarks like that do nothing but discourage people from posting their own questions. I could understand exactly what Glenn was trying to say...even if he did seem slightly rushed. It certainly didn't warrent your response imho.

Pre3mhjt
pre3mhjt is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2004, 16:57
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: England
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
how can RAF aptitudes be artificially high if they're the same tests as RN??

You can take aptitude tests twice. If you pass neither time, thats game over. But if you pass first time, you normally do better second time!

I recently did the aptitudes at OASC and am anxiously waiting that envelope....
semisonic is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2004, 17:33
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Up there somewhere
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You can apply to join the UAS as a pilot having failed aptitudes. I have failed twice and am on a UAS as a pilot. (by 2 marks). It is up to the discretion of the UAS OC whether he takes you or not.

If you pass FHT at the end, that counts as an aptitude pass. I know a few people who have got in that way. I was told to join the UAS as a pilot by the officer who debriefed me on my aptitudes at Cranditz.
Flik Roll is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2004, 18:20
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Anywhere there's ships and aircraft available
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fish

Just to clarify,

To get through the aptitude tests at OASC the mark is artificially high.

Low recruit targets = high pass mark and vice versa

We all select from the top mark down.

Age is a filter too?

Si Clik is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2004, 18:26
  #8 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Pre3mhjt agree but there comes a point when txt spk Bcoms trying.

Certainly bad form to shoot at the first post. Does anyone remember that idjuit that called all of us idiots and called it the Raff?

I think RJs point was valid just a bit abrupt but then aren't we all from time to time.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2004, 18:30
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rivetjoint wind your neck in. Is that the only constructive bit of advice you can offer? Must be hard work being perfect.

Original poster,


You can resit them and people do sometimes pass aptitudes on their second sitting so I wouldn't worry too much. Joining the UAS would definitely be a good idea if you are interested in a career in the RAF. You might find you do better at OASC next time if you have had some exposure to what the service has to offer. Also there will be a lot of help available with your application and report from the Sqn staff.

You can also help yourself with aptitude tests by nailing things like speed/distance/time type equations as this will save up some capacity for other parts of the test. After saying that, there are parts you cant really improve like the hand/eye stuff as this measures innate ability.

Good luck

DS
PPRuNeUser0172 is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2004, 19:11
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: England
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
si clik...so do you have idea what sort of score is competitive now for the RAF??

I need to compare scores....
semisonic is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2004, 20:38
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 1,075
Received 17 Likes on 7 Posts
aviation with pilot studies
Is that a real degree course?
Training Risky is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2004, 12:25
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Anywhere there's ships and aircraft available
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fish

Semisonic,

All I know is that they are higher than ours.

OASC don't tend to give that info out.
Si Clik is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2004, 12:28
  #13 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
aviation with pilot studies
Is that a real degree course?
Far more use than meeja studies, IMHO

Last edited by airborne_artist; 2nd Dec 2004 at 15:49.
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2004, 15:31
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 115
Received 44 Likes on 22 Posts
RivetJoint

Not been involved with many Cranditz graduates recently then???

Can't say that I've noticed any skills in written/spoken English or, indeed, any ability to count without a calculator or the advertised number of digits!

Canary Boy is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2004, 16:05
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rather sweeping statement dont you think Canary Boy? Granted there are people who arent perfect at grammar/oral comms etc but to make a rash generalisation about all recent Cranwell Graduates being illiterate is a little difficult to believe.

At the risk of offending you, you sound like a condescending @rse
PPRuNeUser0172 is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2004, 22:13
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 115
Received 44 Likes on 22 Posts
Dirty S

Not offended at all, and not condescending either (purely factual)!

I deal with Cranditz graduates as part of my daily grind, and have for many years. The general standard is not what it was. To see some trying to wrestle with simple mental arithmetic using fingers is quite alarming. Especially when fundamental numerical skills are central to the flight safety we are trying to teach...

At the risk offending you, you sound like an out of touch @rse!

Canary Boy is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2004, 14:24
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can assure you I am not out of touch having probably graduated Cranwell a lot more recently than you old bean. Merely found your comment a little bit sweeping, when I look around at my contemporaries who graduated with me, I see some pretty articulate and numerate individuals, but then again we are aircrew so maybe the problem is exclusive to you ground types...................

Regards

DS
PPRuNeUser0172 is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2004, 18:03
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 115
Received 44 Likes on 22 Posts


Dirty S

Doh! Of course, you're absolutely right:

a. I don't remember when I graduated from Cranditz.
b. We ground types are immeasurably inferior to anyone of the 2-wing master race.
c. The Airforce would run much more smoothly if it were ruled by senior members of the aircrew fraternity.....

CB
Canary Boy is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2004, 18:14
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 64
Posts: 2,278
Received 36 Likes on 14 Posts
And these are Officers, Cranwell's Best, supposedly the Creme de la creme, more like Yoghourt.

Come on guys, grow up, we underlings are supposed to look up to people like yourselves, Stop making yourselves look like children.

No wonder the RAF is in such a mess, if the likes of you two become our leaders.
ZH875 is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2004, 15:35
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Referring back to the original question,

I agree with DS, mental arithmetic practice really helped me out. I initially failed the tests badly due to being a member of the calculator generation, a bit of graft with some mental sums and i became "competitive". Now aviating in one of Her Majesty's finest.
Carnage is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.