Joint Force Harrier
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Berks UK
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Joint Force Harrier
Just read an interesting article in "Aircraft Illustrated" (I think!!) about the disbandment of 800 Sqn NAS, at the end it mentioned that 800 would be reformed on Harrier GR7/9 and one of the RAF Harrier Squadrons at RAF Cottesmore would be disbanded (or 'losing its number plate' as the article phrased it'). Is this correct and does anyone have any idea of which squadron it will be?
Thanks in advance
Rgds
Bluejay
Thanks in advance
Rgds
Bluejay
To save you wading through the thread (although, if I may, I'd suggest you read it, since it is an interesting one!):
Yes, it's true.
There will be four GR 7A/GR 9 units, each (last time I saw it published) 9 aircraft each.
Under present plans (or at least those that have made it into the public domain), 3 Squadron, as the most junior of the Harrier number plates will disband, but, since it is one of the most senior RAF number plates, will almost certainly reform on the Typhoon.
1 and 4 will have a preponderance of RAF pilots, while 800 and 801 are to have a preponderance of RN pilots - but all four will have an RAF/RN mix.
Yes, it's true.
There will be four GR 7A/GR 9 units, each (last time I saw it published) 9 aircraft each.
Under present plans (or at least those that have made it into the public domain), 3 Squadron, as the most junior of the Harrier number plates will disband, but, since it is one of the most senior RAF number plates, will almost certainly reform on the Typhoon.
1 and 4 will have a preponderance of RAF pilots, while 800 and 801 are to have a preponderance of RN pilots - but all four will have an RAF/RN mix.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Berks UK
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks Archimedes
and thanks WE Branch Fanatic
Personally I think its a shame that any of the Harrier units should loose their number plates, but if that is what has to be done then it has to be done.
I will read that thread in the near future with interest.
Unfortunatly I am not Aircrew (due to an unfortunate event earlier in life) but I am a huge fan of Harrier as my Dad used to fly it (GR1, GR1A, AV8A (with USMC) and GR3), luckily I still get to get up close as I am with the ATC and I will always try to go to camp at either Cottesmore or Wittering, sadly though I doubt I will ever get a ride in one.
Many thanks again guys
Regards
Bluejay
and thanks WE Branch Fanatic
Personally I think its a shame that any of the Harrier units should loose their number plates, but if that is what has to be done then it has to be done.
I will read that thread in the near future with interest.
Unfortunatly I am not Aircrew (due to an unfortunate event earlier in life) but I am a huge fan of Harrier as my Dad used to fly it (GR1, GR1A, AV8A (with USMC) and GR3), luckily I still get to get up close as I am with the ATC and I will always try to go to camp at either Cottesmore or Wittering, sadly though I doubt I will ever get a ride in one.
Many thanks again guys
Regards
Bluejay
This whole 'reorganisation' looks like 'bending over backwards' in order to accomodate RN sensibilities.
Four nine aircraft squadrons? Why, when numerous studies have shown that the optimum sized unit is 16 aircraft, and that 12 or 13 is a good compromise.
Why should half of those units have RN numberplates (and presumably RN COs, etc.) when the RN will be providing fewer than a quarter of the aircrew? This will artificially constrain the careers and career opportunities of RAF Harrier aircrew, and will give the RN a disproportionate influence and 'apparent' presence within JFH.
If the RN numberplates are so vital, then retain three properly sized squadrons (12 aircraft each) and divide the dark blue one into two flights with two RN numberplates for those flights, as they do in the French Armée de l'Air (you could even save a third RN numberplate for the full sized squadron).
Four nine aircraft squadrons? Why, when numerous studies have shown that the optimum sized unit is 16 aircraft, and that 12 or 13 is a good compromise.
Why should half of those units have RN numberplates (and presumably RN COs, etc.) when the RN will be providing fewer than a quarter of the aircrew? This will artificially constrain the careers and career opportunities of RAF Harrier aircrew, and will give the RN a disproportionate influence and 'apparent' presence within JFH.
If the RN numberplates are so vital, then retain three properly sized squadrons (12 aircraft each) and divide the dark blue one into two flights with two RN numberplates for those flights, as they do in the French Armée de l'Air (you could even save a third RN numberplate for the full sized squadron).
I'm not absolutely certain about this, althenick, but IIRC, while this is meant to be the state of affairs, there are simply not enough FAA FJ pilots to meet this figure.
The RAF mans three 13 aircraft Harrier GR7 squadrons (and a big OCU and an OEU) with ease, and with lots of youngsters in the pipeline. Manning two eight aircraft SHar units was already causing the RN severe problems. Unless the manning level per 'frame is very different, expecting a 50:50 mix is a tad optimistic. 25% is regarded by many as a best case expectation of RN manning within JFH.
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The 24th & a Half Century
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
7 Posts
Given that the aircraft will be pooled, ie a 'wing concept', it is rather a semantical notion to talk about number of aircraft per Sqn. Fact is that there will be 2 Naval Air Squadrons operating GR7a/9a, dark blue heavy, who will be the prinicipal carrier Sqns, however, if conflict loomed then you would embark those with the necessitated qualifications, ie 'x' pilots who are CofC, 'x' who are INQ and 'x' who are FNQ off the boat for example.
And the issue of constraining careers, what nonsense, an RN Sqn could have a QFI or QWI who is light blue and vice versa, just because 1 Wg Cdr post goes the world does not end. The nitty gritty will be do the 2 Naval Air Squadrons keep there traditional structure, ie SP/QWI/Ops etc.... or adopt the light blue Flight structure??
And as for:
"will give the RN a disproportionate influence and 'apparent' presence within JFH."
Hence the word Joint. Plus the 'dark blue' presence on the JCA Team is in parity with that of the light blue community.......
And the issue of constraining careers, what nonsense, an RN Sqn could have a QFI or QWI who is light blue and vice versa, just because 1 Wg Cdr post goes the world does not end. The nitty gritty will be do the 2 Naval Air Squadrons keep there traditional structure, ie SP/QWI/Ops etc.... or adopt the light blue Flight structure??
And as for:
"will give the RN a disproportionate influence and 'apparent' presence within JFH."
Hence the word Joint. Plus the 'dark blue' presence on the JCA Team is in parity with that of the light blue community.......
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The 24th & a Half Century
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
7 Posts
Well Grim, you should not read too much into what's published in the Telegraph it is somewhat off the mark i am afraid......India do not need Harriers for much longer now they've signed the deal for the Gorshkov and the MiG-29s.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Berks UK
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pontius Navigator
Over 150 posts! About time I clicked here and ordered a Personal Title.
posted 15th April 2004 07:50
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bluejay, are you female?
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posts: 173 | From: Lincolnshire | Registered: Dec 2002 | Status: Offline | IP: Logged
Negative!!
Over 150 posts! About time I clicked here and ordered a Personal Title.
posted 15th April 2004 07:50
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bluejay, are you female?
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posts: 173 | From: Lincolnshire | Registered: Dec 2002 | Status: Offline | IP: Logged
Negative!!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: troon
Age: 61
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Jacko,
Bear in mind that -
a/ there are more SHAR pilots than on the SHAR squadrons currently but most are in the system elsewhere (fish heading and the like)
b/ FAA squadrons have always worked with less men than the RAF. I'm told by my father (Ex FAA Bucc Maintainer) that it's due to the RAF having 5 tech trades to the WAFU's 3 and different maintainence routines. Currently 801 Squadron is manned by 13 Officers, 34 Senior Rates and 78 Junior Rates. The majority of personnel are directly involved with flying or aircraft maintenance: however, the Squadron is a self-contained unit with its own administrators, cooks and stewards. (Taken from the RN website)
... I suspect that there is Gapping in here but I would hazard a guess that the Aircraft - Manning ratio is significatly smaller than the GR7 Squadrons at present.
Bear in mind that -
a/ there are more SHAR pilots than on the SHAR squadrons currently but most are in the system elsewhere (fish heading and the like)
b/ FAA squadrons have always worked with less men than the RAF. I'm told by my father (Ex FAA Bucc Maintainer) that it's due to the RAF having 5 tech trades to the WAFU's 3 and different maintainence routines. Currently 801 Squadron is manned by 13 Officers, 34 Senior Rates and 78 Junior Rates. The majority of personnel are directly involved with flying or aircraft maintenance: however, the Squadron is a self-contained unit with its own administrators, cooks and stewards. (Taken from the RN website)
... I suspect that there is Gapping in here but I would hazard a guess that the Aircraft - Manning ratio is significatly smaller than the GR7 Squadrons at present.
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The 24th & a Half Century
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
7 Posts
Alt, you only have to look at the RED FLAG detachments last year, 1(F) Sqn bought more people and equipment than would have been needed for a permanant detachment! They even sea freighted nearly a dozen ISO containers for a 2 week det plus the usual Hercs, VC10s and, nearly forgot, a Tri* as well.
Althenick, you are right about manning ratios, best example is the Safety Equipment section on a squadron, your Naval Air Squadron has ONE SE rating, whilst at Cottesmore i counted at least 8.
Althenick, you are right about manning ratios, best example is the Safety Equipment section on a squadron, your Naval Air Squadron has ONE SE rating, whilst at Cottesmore i counted at least 8.
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
Bluejay sorry, just that I knew a 'famous' Harrier pilot with an ATCer in the RAF. nuff said.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Berks UK
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No problem Pontius
Funnily enough my Mum was an Air Trafficer (RAF)!!
The closest I will ever come to being in the RAF is as a part time ATC Warrant Officer.
I would also like to say a huge thanks to everyone that has helped us and looked after us at various stations around the country, especially Wittering and Cottesmore (my two favourites) Kinloss, Lossie and Odiham. Can't wait for our camp at Lyneham later in the year should be a good one.
Who knows I may see some fellow prooners some time
Take care all
Bluejay
Funnily enough my Mum was an Air Trafficer (RAF)!!
The closest I will ever come to being in the RAF is as a part time ATC Warrant Officer.
I would also like to say a huge thanks to everyone that has helped us and looked after us at various stations around the country, especially Wittering and Cottesmore (my two favourites) Kinloss, Lossie and Odiham. Can't wait for our camp at Lyneham later in the year should be a good one.
Who knows I may see some fellow prooners some time
Take care all
Bluejay
DuckDodgers, re: your SE manning levels, there were five of us on 3 (F) squadron, Two airmen, Two Nco's and a Snco. I belive the level had to do with leave, the possibility of deploying to two locations and the fact we also carried out something called 'after flights' on the pilots AEA, which is something that the navy boys don't do.
Pontius Navigator, your 'famous' pilot is a top person !
The best thing I remeber about working with the Navy? The boat course- firefighting during the day and zooms and joannas at night:
and meeting up with an old F.3 mate who's gone to the dark(blue) side on Shars.
ben
Pontius Navigator, your 'famous' pilot is a top person !
The best thing I remeber about working with the Navy? The boat course- firefighting during the day and zooms and joannas at night:
and meeting up with an old F.3 mate who's gone to the dark(blue) side on Shars.ben